DS Forums

 
 

I miss Paloma


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 18-11-2010, 01:13
ea91
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 2,275

I genuinely enjoyed her being fired and felt she deserved to go. But now there isn't anyone left that I feel strongly about. She should've been kept on a bit longer like Philip from series 5, that was the firing I enjoyed the most out of all the Apprentice firings. (except for Sophocles in series 4, but that was bittersweet because unlike Philip who was mostly blindsided by his obvious crush on Kate, Michael had absolutely zero integrity left and should've been fired weeks before he was actually fired) But Lord Sugar didn't think about building up drama this time and made the right decision and fired Paloma. Damn.
ea91 is offline   Reply With Quote
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
Old 18-11-2010, 01:26
pjw1985
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 4,750
Good riddance i say
pjw1985 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18-11-2010, 11:14
CXC3000
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Shire of York
Posts: 9,728
Echo the sentiments of the OP. Watching back one or two episodes of where Paloma was featured, you realise what we're missing.

And I think she posted on here too (well, until we all went nuts on her).
CXC3000 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18-11-2010, 20:43
Socha
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Laich Kintraes
Posts: 4,086
Agree with the OP. She certainly brought something to the series and I miss her too.
Socha is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18-11-2010, 22:13
Cake_Nibbler
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 6,463
I actually really liked Paloma. Thought she was very capable and I really didn't see her ''outburst'' as being that bad.

Plus she was hot and had a great accent.
Cake_Nibbler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19-11-2010, 01:24
DavetheScot
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 16,500
And I think she posted on here too (well, until we all went nuts on her).
Someone posted here that some posters thought was Paloma. There was no evidence for it though, and I didn't think they were.
DavetheScot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19-11-2010, 01:42
ea91
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 2,275
Someone posted here that some posters thought was Paloma. There was no evidence for it though, and I didn't think they were.
They said they worked with Paloma, they worked on set, and they're not Paloma. I don't wanna get anyone in trouble, but if you think about it it's possible all of it could be true.
ea91 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19-11-2010, 02:20
DavetheScot
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 16,500
They said they worked with Paloma, they worked on set, and they're not Paloma. I don't wanna get anyone in trouble, but if you think about it it's possible all of it could be true.
Their accounts were such they couldn't all have been true.
DavetheScot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19-11-2010, 02:52
ea91
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 2,275
Their accounts were such they couldn't all have been true.
Think about it. They could.
ea91 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19-11-2010, 13:05
kates89
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 1,926
As do I. I think the show's lacking something now but can't really put my finger on what. Think she is head and shoulders above some of the remaining candidates to be honest, just a shame she let her mouth run away with her.
kates89 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19-11-2010, 13:39
Shrike
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Nottingham
Posts: 11,474
Their accounts were such they couldn't all have been true.
Think about it. They could.
I think the implication was the poster was one of the other apprentices that had been with Paloma that task. Since the poster thought very highly of Paloma I doubt it would have been Sandeesh ("Princess Paloma never gets her hands dirty") which would leave Laura.
Frankly I doubt it would be a real apprentice posting before the series is finished so I still maintain it was a delusional Paloma fan...
Shrike is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 21-11-2010, 02:17
DavetheScot
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 16,500
Think about it. They could.
No. They contradicted themselves. Whatever the truth, some of what they were saying was plainly lies.
DavetheScot is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply




 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:27.