The STUPID people who keep voting for Gillian to do a trial...

3 of 3

daisydee

20-11-2010

Originally Posted by Shedhedd:
“I totally agree, last year it briefly became the Katie Price show, who was nominated for trial after trial till she walked. The fake phobias, the fake shaking of the legs?? The public soon cottoned on to her though eventually..
So the producers should have an addendum where the person nominated for the last trial are exempt from the next one, and if they are found faking it they should be banned from all trials. Doesn't make good telly for ITV though. ”

The producers (and everyone else involved in the show) know that she is faking her 'fears' lol

but they think that it makes 'good TV'. I would just like McKeith to be ignored from now on, that would really p**s her off. She knew exactly what she was doing from the start, the only thing she is afraid of is not having the cameras on her.
I hope she is given a hard time by the media when she comes out and shown up for the fraud she is.

lingerlonger

20-11-2010

Originally Posted by Charlie123xxx:
“Exactly ,so why " lingerlonger" would that make the voters stupid and idiots?
Isn't that all part of the show to see them suffer.
The food issues are always a big thing.
People no if Gillian gets a trial they are most likely not going to get much to eat.”

Because the celebs will ALWAYS suffer on the food front, even when there is plenty to go round. The producers make sure of that. I mean, alligator feet for dinner tonight, anyone? Or how about kangaroo tongue? Or perhaps kangaroo testicles? The votes don't determine what food is doled out.

I'm now starting to question YOUR intelligence, dear Charlie123xxx.

ABCZYX

20-11-2010

The people who keep voting for her to do the trials are turning a great show into a boring show.

There's really no point in getting the public to vote for who does the trial. They may as well just say, "We know that Gillian is going to get the most votes, so she's doing the trial".

Please let someone else do the trials, so they can get a chance and so we can see how well they do.

Charlie123xxx

20-11-2010

Originally Posted by lingerlonger:
“Because the celebs will ALWAYS suffer on the food front, even when there is plenty to go round. The producers make sure of that. I mean, alligator feet for dinner tonight, anyone? Or how about kangaroo tongue? Or perhaps kangaroo testicles? The votes don't determine what food is doled out.

I'm now starting to question YOUR intelligence, dear Charlie123xxx. ”

LOL
Question away.
There are more than me on this forum question yours.

Charlie123xxx

20-11-2010

Originally Posted by ABCZYX:
“The people who keep voting for her to do the trials are turning a great show into a boring show.

There's really no point in getting the public to vote for who does the trial. They may as well just say, "We know that Gillian is going to get the most votes, so she's doing the trial".

Please let someone else do the trials, so they can get a chance and so we can see how well they do.”

The only way they can do that is to change the rules so everyone gets a turn.
It happens every time
Katie Price Janice Dickinson.
You can't dictate to the public it just makes them vote that way even more.
Like it or not thats the way it will happen.

glendaveny

20-11-2010

All they need is a very simple rule that the person who did the last trial is excluded from the next vote. Then we would only be bored rigid by the pathetic woman every second night!!!!!!!!!

3 of 3