Originally Posted by sn_22:
“The Corrie storyline is much better designed for a continued viewer boost than EE was, thats for sure. As someone who started watching on Monday, I'm sure I'll drift off at some point over the next week - but I might just watch again tonight to see off the whole 'night' of the disaster.”
Exactly. I watched the one episode of EastEnders and was reminded how awful it is and haven't watched since.
With Corrie I've watched all this weeks episodes and it looks like it's done enough to keep me watching in the short term at least.
Originally Posted by rzt:
“Corrie Live- 14m... Enders Live- 15.6m. I think Corrie will timeshift more and close the gap in the officials to about a million behind.”
And already did when you add in the 10.35pm screening.
Originally Posted by Jaycee Dove:
“But like I said this all assumes it was about the live episode.
It was not.
East Enders was a single one off live episode.
Corrie is having a week long storyline of which the live episode was just a part.
Being just a part of a several episode event was bound to dilute its status as a single episode, live or not. Surely?”
Taking into account the week of episodes, who averages higher?
Quote:
“And I honestly think few people even in TV will really care which one 'won' over the other just because it was live, whichever way it goes.
Given what the cast of Corrie seem to be saying live episodes might even become more common. Which is great as it adds an edge to the show.”
With the move towards drama series stripped across the week surely it's only a matter of time before a "live" drama is commissioned - or perhaps a live week of soap episodes - perhaps for Emmerdales 40th in 2012.