• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • TV Shows: Reality
  • The Apprentice
Praise for Stuart's German efforts
<<
<
3 of 4
>>
>
aussie_dave_g
25-11-2010
Originally Posted by munta:
“There is never any excuse for racial abuse. EVER!”


Isn't Joanna black? Just saying ......... kind of makes her exempt (well according to societys rules)

(god, I cant believe Im getting involved in this. It will all end in tears this thread!)
munta
25-11-2010
Originally Posted by aussie_dave_g:
“Isn't Joanna black? Just saying ......... kind of makes her exempt (well according to societys rules)

(god, I cant believe Im getting involved in this. It will all end in tears this thread!)”

of course it doesn't make her exempt.
Jepson
25-11-2010
Originally Posted by munta:
“There is never any excuse for racial abuse. EVER!”

Well, not in an absolute sense, no, but if you call a white person a 'white prick', it would probably count as racist even though the 'white' part is a simple statement of fact.

According to the report "The driver made an extremely provocative, sexist and insulting comment" so if she called him a <xxx> arsehole, that could be interpreted as racial abuse even though the <xxx> is factually correct but irrelevant.

What she got into trouble for, though, was kicking the taxi.

She was not convicted of doing anything racially aggravated and the only evidence we have that she did are the words of a couple of elements of the gutter press. Which is certainly not enough for me to form any sensible judgement.
munta
25-11-2010
Originally Posted by Jepson:
“Well, not in an absolute sense, no, but if you call a white person a 'white prick', it would probably count as racist even though the 'white' part is a simple statement of fact.

According to the report "The driver made an extremely provocative, sexist and insulting comment" so if she called him a <xxx> arsehole, that could be interpreted as racial abuse even though the <xxx> is factually correct but irrelevant.

What she got into trouble for, though, was kicking the taxi.

She was not convicted of doing anything racially aggravated and the only evidence we have that she did are the words of a couple of elements of the gutter press. Which is certainly not enough for me to form any sensible judgement.”

She called him a "f**king dirty p*ki",

F**king - fair enough, we all swear at people when angry
dirty - an absolute reference to him and his race being unclean, filthy, scummy etc
p*ki - entirely derogitory and much like n*gger which ever way you look at it. Only acceptable if used by pakistanis when describing themselves in an ironic way.
whedon247
25-11-2010
jepson has shown her true colours here,i have nothing left to say on the matter now

broken britian indeed.
Jepson
25-11-2010
Originally Posted by munta:
“She called him a "f**king dirty p*ki",

F**king - fair enough, we all swear at people when angry”

Agreed.

Quote:
“dirty - an absolute reference to him and his race being unclean, filthy, scummy etc”

Certainly not.

If anyone made a sexually offensive comment to someone they are likely to be called dirty.

I wonder why you associate Pakistanis and being dirty?

It would not have occurred to me.

Quote:
“Only acceptable if used by pakistanis when describing themselves in an ironic way.”

You are actually saying something is acceptable for one race but not another?

That sounds very racist to me.

And racism is never acceptable.
whedon247
25-11-2010
saying it in ironic way is not on either

but its funny that you find that VERY racist but joannas foul mouthed tirade is ok by you LMAO

are you joanna?
ave83it
25-11-2010
Originally Posted by aussie_dave_g:
“Isn't Joanna black? Just saying ......... kind of makes her exempt (well according to societys rules)”

What an absolutely ridiculous thing to say.

I also can't believe how much support and love seems to be flowing in the direction of Stuart. The guy is obviously a prick, one episode where he was slightly less annoying certainly doesn't make him a nicer person!!!

I also found this little beauty...... how nice!!!

Click

and this....

Click
Sherlock_Holmes
25-11-2010
Originally Posted by whedon247:
“better than joannas "WE ....ARE....FROM.....ENGLAND, YOU....ARE...NOT...CLEVER....LIKE...ME, SO....LISTEN...CAREFULLY".”

Yeah, that was a bit cringeworthy

Luckily she and Stella were able to charm the hotel manager
Jepson
25-11-2010
Originally Posted by whedon247:
“jepson has shown her true colours here”

Pointing out that your continual obsessing about one incident that has not been reliably reported and happened five years ago in the heat of the moment to repeatedly bash a candidate (the only black candidate, BTW) is hardly 'showing true colours'.

It's just asking for a little sense of proportion.
Jepson
25-11-2010
Originally Posted by whedon247:
“but its funny that you find that VERY racist but joannas foul mouthed tirade is ok by you LMAO”

If it happened (we know she kicked the taxi because she was found guilty of that but for the racial abuse we only have the word of a couple of members of the gutter press), it wasn't OK.

But

It happened once and it happened five years ago.

Your continually resurrecting that to bash the only black candidate in the process is what's really suspicious.
Damanda
25-11-2010
delete
Damanda
25-11-2010
Originally Posted by aussie_dave_g:
“Isn't Joanna black? Just saying ......... kind of makes her exempt (well according to societys rules)

(god, I cant believe Im getting involved in this. It will all end in tears this thread!)”

Come and sit on the comfy chairs with me, I've got popcorn
whedon247
25-11-2010
Originally Posted by Jepson:
“If it happened (we know she kicked the taxi because she was found guilty of that but for the racial abuse we only have the word of a couple of members of the gutter press), it wasn't OK.

But

It happened once and it happened five years ago.

Your continually resurrecting that to bash the only black candidate in the process is what's really suspicious.”

oh ok so because shes black any criticism must be racist?

you have lost it love, take a timeout and come back later
aussie_dave_g
25-11-2010
Originally Posted by Damanda:
“Come and sit on the comfy chairs with me, I've got popcorn ”

Actually I cant afford to get involved, Ive already got two bans on here and I believe the third one is permanent.

And trust me, the mods ban you for the slightest indescretion around here. Still never got an explanation as to why I got done the first two times.
munta
25-11-2010
Originally Posted by Jepson:
“If it happened (we know she kicked the taxi because she was found guilty of that but for the racial abuse we only have the word of a couple of members of the gutter press), it wasn't OK.

But

It happened once and it happened five years ago.

Your continually resurrecting that to bash the only black candidate in the process is what's really suspicious.”

This is what she was found guilty of

Quote:
“The 25-year-old pleaded guilty to 'causing racially aggravated fear or provocation of violence' and was given a two-year conditional discharge.”

We know it was racial abuse because she admitted it and was found guilty
ave83it
25-11-2010
Originally Posted by aussie_dave_g:
“Actually I cant afford to get involved, Ive already got two bans on here and I believe the third one is permanent.
.”

2 bans already and only 172 posts??? Hahahahaha! That's some amazing going that is!
Jepson
25-11-2010
Originally Posted by whedon247:
“oh ok so because shes black any criticism must be racist?”

Nope.

It's the fact that you are carrying on a virtual hate campaign against the only black candidate in the process that raises suspicion.

Quote:
“you have lost it love”

There's also something inherently creepy about someone who repeatedly refers to someone they don't know as 'love' or 'dear'.

I know it's a rather childish ploy (and water off a duck's back) but it does make you come across as a wee bit sleazy.
aussie_dave_g
25-11-2010
Originally Posted by ave83it:
“2 bans already and only 172 posts??? Hahahahaha! That's some amazing going that is!”

I think sometimes my abrupt style of comments doesn't transalate well for the middle class mums who moderate these forums.
Jepson
25-11-2010
Originally Posted by munta:
“We know it was racial abuse because she admitted it and was found guilty”

It was the wording that I was referring to when I said we didn't know for sure.

And nothing alters the fact that it was a one off incident half a decade ago and yet it is being brought up on a regular basis which makes one wonder about the motives of those who find the need to obsess about something so remote.
whedon247
25-11-2010
i hate laura aswell rest assured
munta
25-11-2010
Originally Posted by Jepson:
“It was the wording that I was referring to when I said we didn't know for sure.

And nothing alters the fact that it was a one off incident half a decade ago and yet it is being brought up on a regular basis which makes one wonder about the motives of those who find the need to obsess about something so remote.”

And I worry about the motives of someone who makes light of a racist attack.
Jepson
25-11-2010
Originally Posted by munta:
“And I worry about the motives of someone who makes light of a racist attack.”

Who might that be?

There are many things people do that are reprehensible and for which they must shoulder their share of opprobrium.

However, continually obsessing about one off, heat of the moment, incidents from half a decade ago sometimes tells us more about the people doing the obsessing that it does about the person against whom they are obsessing.

I've already agreed that racist abuse is unacceptable at any time. (And I've been banned from a couple forums on more than one occasion for overstepping the mark with racist posters - it's not something I take lightly).

Just wondering why a couple of posters are continually using such an old incident to bash the only black candidate.
whedon247
25-11-2010
you cant for one second think theres any valid reason not to like joanna can you???????????????????????

look at the other threads, ive cited plenty of reasons i dont like joanna,none of them to do with racism
nanscombe
25-11-2010
That's the funny thing about insults ... They are meant be insulting.

She should probably have called him "A f*cin' dirty Pakinstani"

That would have been a more acceptable insult .




And yes, well done to Stuart for open the conversation in German. A nice touch, I thought.
<<
<
3 of 4
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map