• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • Strictly Come Dancing
How would you have ranked them tonight?
<<
<
3 of 3
>>
>
marinamau
28-11-2010
Originally Posted by RichmondBlue:
“Matt.. 9 (Best dance of the night)
Pamela..8 (Fun, but something lacking..energy?)
Kara..8 (Not her best by any means)
Patsy..7 (OK, but played it safe)
Scott..6 (That's probably generous)
Gavin..5 (The choreography didn't do him any favours)
Ann..2 (What can you say?)

Overall, I thought it was a poor night..most of them took a step backwards.”

Completely agree.
Jan2555*GG*
28-11-2010
Pamela
Kara
Matt
Scott
Patsy
Gavin
Ann

Oh hold a minute thats the same order as those pesky judges that have had so much abuse tonight
poleanna
28-11-2010
Originally Posted by Jan2555*GG*:
“Pamela
Kara
Matt
Scott
Patsy
Gavin
Ann

Oh hold a minute thats the same order as those pesky judges that have had so much abuse tonight”

Ditto. I agree with the judges' leader board though don't agree with their individual marks.
SheShe
28-11-2010
Originally Posted by Saturn:
“Very very controversial marking tonight.

I'd have ranked them..

Matt
Kara
Pamela
Patsy
Scott
Gavin
Ann”

My ranking too.
CASPER1066
28-11-2010
Matt - most energetic and thoughtful
Kara - not her best
Pamela - lack of energy and stiff movement
Patsy - Lack lustre, looked confused.
Scott = lost the plot
Gavin - couldnt find the plot.
Ann - turned up
gorlagon
28-11-2010
Nobody blew me away.

Equal:

Matt: good but a bit weird
Kara: good but a bit flat
Pamela: good but a bit um... solid

Next:

Patsy: average

Next rung down but equal:

Scott: the good bits were good but the rest was a disaster
Gavin: generally bad (and I like Gavin!)

Bottom:

Ann

(PS: My favourite is Matt)
parthena
28-11-2010
I could have written that post myself, Gorlagon

None of seem to differ much.
<<
<
3 of 3
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map