Originally Posted by
-Sid-:
“Brave or daft? 
I thought tonight's ITT merely served to highlight what a poor judge Alesha is.
I'm surprised the producers exposed her bizarre marking so openly given how hard they've tried in the past to convince us that she's worthy of her judge status.”
Originally Posted by -Sid-:
“Hi Jinx,
Is that not a crucial aspect of judging though? Inter-rater reliability?
If the panel can't agree, how on earth are we supposed to take them seriously? To trust them? Who are we to believe?”
Originally Posted by tinselgirl:
“Except in my opinion she didn't explain herself - just made it worse by admitting that she wasn't marking the dance she saw she was marking to compemsate for what she thought was harsh marking from Craig!!
Totally hopeless. She is being paid to judge the dancing not arrange the leaderboard as SHE thinks it should look. She has totally discredited the judging system. What a stupid woman.”
Originally Posted by
-Sid-:
“That's because the judges (especially Alesha), often don't have very credible arguments to back up their dodgy scores!
Hence threads like this....
I couldn't believe they sat there criticising Kara's timing and Matt's tense face, and then ooohed and ahhhed as we saw Pamela's manic face and heavy footing during the replay of her Charleston. It's those sorts of inconsistencies that make us question the judges (and reading back the ITT thread, it seems I'm not alone!).”
Emm...mmm! - this thread sounds like an excuse to bash Alesha to me. Her comments will never please because she's not a trained dancer or judge and she has suspect grammer. Would it have mattered how she'd explained herself today, she would still have been slated and this thread would probably have been titled the same.
It has been noted that all the judges except craig have been a little erratic with their marks yet it always seems to be Alesha who is singled out. I admit her marks are sometimes a little generous though that can also be said of Bruno and Len depending on their bias tendencies.
Len likes tradition so he marks accordingly - if he sees something too modern he will mark it down though he too has admitted that he can be generous because he wants to be supportive. Bruno likes drama as well as technique but bottom line is it has to 'float his boat'.
I don't agree that all the judges need to agree as they are individuals coming from different perspectives. What should be more impressive is when they all agree with their marks as that should tell how good or how bad the dance was. Also quite frankly if they agreed all the time what would we on this board have to talk about! It's obvious we all like to moan!
