• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • Strictly Come Dancing
Is Ann homophobic?
<<
<
2 of 13
>>
>
mossy2103
01-12-2010
Originally Posted by DavidJames:
“Looking here, she has a clear record of opposition to equality legislation.

Combined with the fact that she opposed the repeal of Section 28 - introducing a wrecking amendment - in 2003, it seems clear that Ann believes that equal rights for gays are a bad thing.

So, do we think she's a homophobe, or does she simply have a set of opinions which outwardly appear homophobic?

Discuss ”

And this question is relevant to SCD how?
dome
01-12-2010
Originally Posted by Noone:
“She's religious and moral, that's her foundation. She can basically disapprove of the homosexual act but I don't see why that should also make her a hater.

I don't think this a question we can answer. I'm not defending her because I have any love for her, I don't.”

Exactly.

This personal attack is as bad as the one who questioned her grief for her brother's death imo.
kperdnusse
01-12-2010
Originally Posted by dome:
“So every practising Catholic is a homophobe, as are Muslims and various others who don't believe in gay marriage.

Interesting, there are probably many viewers that fall into that camp, but would object to that tag.”

In a similar way to people who start sentences "I'm not a racist/homophobic/sexist etc but..." then go on to prove that they are exactly that, you mean?
DavidJames
01-12-2010
Originally Posted by Tommo781:
“Not ANOTHER AW thread!”

Ah, but this isn't any old AW thread.

This is a DavidJames AW thread.
Mistress
01-12-2010
Originally Posted by Noone:
“She's religious and moral, that's her foundation. She can basically disapprove of the homosexual act but I don't see why that should also make her a hater.”

Which homosexual act? Graham Norton? Sue Perkins?
dome
01-12-2010
Originally Posted by DavidJames:
“You're taking things to extremes, I think. And you're expanding the topic. My topic is not "Is the Catholic Church homophobic?" - that;s not really relevant to this forum - but "Is Ann homophobic?".

If someone acts in a discrimatory way - and Ann clearly has done so, look at the record - are they bigotted, or not?

If they actively promote and support discriminatory measures, what would you describe them as?”

She was a practising Anglican and converted to Catholicism, so it is relevant.
Dorabella14
01-12-2010
Originally Posted by DavidJames:
“I dunno.

If a set of beliefs includes discrimination against a particular minority, then what would you call it?

Personally, I'd call those beliefs discriminatory.”

Sorry, but anybody who converts from being Anglican to Roman Catholic purely on the issue of Y/N to women priests is neither a true Anglican nor a true Catholic, just someone with very pronounced views. Her voting history has nothing to do with religion and everything to do with personal opinion.
DavidJames
01-12-2010
Originally Posted by mossy2103:
“And this question is relevant to SCD how?”

Ah, I'm glad you asked that.

Firstly, I'd answer that there are many threads about contestant's personal lives - e.g. the Kara / Artem one recently. So this is along the lines of those.

Secondly, I'd answer is that the reason Ann is in, is all because of her "entertainment" value. So as this entertainment is all about her personality, it's completely valid to ask questions about that personality.
DavidJames
01-12-2010
Originally Posted by dome:
“This personal attack”

It's not a personal attack.

It's a question about a contestant's personality.

There's a difference.
Noone
01-12-2010
Originally Posted by Mistress:
“Which homosexual act? Graham Norton? Sue Perkins?”

Both.
-Sid-
01-12-2010
Ann has actively campaigned against gay rights in parliament so she isn't really in the same boat as those religious people who think homosexuality is wrong but who hold those views privately and don't attempt to meddle in the lives of gay people.

If Ann wants to be a practicing Christian, then that's up to her. No one should stop her doing so. Why then, does she think she has a right to stop gay couples marrying and adopting children? It's none of her damn business. No one is asking her to marry a rug muncher and adopt a couple of sprogs.

She's an interfering old bigot.

But she has given me a few laughs on Strictly.
evil dipsy
01-12-2010
Originally Posted by Mistress:
“Don't know about "morally acceptable", but I wouldn't vote for her in a political election because she is homophobic, misogynist and has bonkers views on what constitutes an ideal family (which run completely counter to anthropological evidence). She therefore doesn't represent my views.

I don't vote for her in Strictly because she's shite at dancing, doesn't try and is altogether belligerent and unappealing.”

This is my favourite post of the entire year.
Philly1234
01-12-2010
She's not homophobic, I don't think. That term is used too frequently. It really connotes someone (usually a man) who objects to homosexuality because they secretly fear/know that they themselves are a homosexual.

I would say her beliefs are prejudiced. She spouts particular religious party-line type anti-gay sentiments. It's sad, but it doesn't make her homophobic.
dottigirl
01-12-2010
Originally Posted by Mistress:
“Don't know about "morally acceptable", but I wouldn't vote for her in a political election because she is homophobic, misogynist and has bonkers views on what constitutes an ideal family (which run completely counter to anthropological evidence). She therefore doesn't represent my views.

I don't vote for her in Strictly because she's shite at dancing, doesn't try and is altogether belligerent and unappealing.”

I'd agree with that.

Originally Posted by Dorabella14:
“Sorry, but anybody who converts from being Anglican to Roman Catholic purely on the issue of Y/N to women priests is neither a true Anglican nor a true Catholic, just someone with very pronounced views. Her voting history has nothing to do with religion and everything to do with personal opinion.”

Yup. Not very Christian-like at all to throw your toys out of the pram and take off either.
DavidJames
01-12-2010
Note to Dome:
Originally Posted by -Sid-:
“She's an interfering old bigot.”

Now that's a personal attack.

See the difference?
DavidJames
01-12-2010
Originally Posted by Mistress:
“Don't know about "morally acceptable", but I wouldn't vote for her in a political election.”

Well, I guess my question is: should we apply "acceptability" criteria to candidates at some point, even for a light entertainment show?

I mean, Anton got a lot of flak for his reported comment about Laila last year - and clearly that issue had nothing to do with dancing.
jill1812
01-12-2010
Originally Posted by Philly1234:
“She's not homophobic, I don't think. That term is used too frequently. It really connotes someone (usually a man) who objects to homosexuality because they secretly fear/know that they themselves are a homosexual.

I would say her beliefs are prejudiced. She spouts particular religious party-line type anti-gay sentiments. It's sad, but it doesn't make her homophobic.”

She also tried to stop gay rights legislation by voting against. She is trying to force her view, that homosexuality is wrong on others, surely that equals prejudiced.
-Sid-
01-12-2010
Originally Posted by DavidJames:
“Note to Dome:


Now that's a personal attack.

See the difference? ”

People attack with their views on here all the time. The stars of the show are fair game as far as I'm concerned (and being negative about them doesn't break house rules).

I never attack other forum users though.
DavidJames
01-12-2010
Originally Posted by -Sid-:
“People attack with their views on here all the time. The stars of the show are fair game as far as I'm concerned (and being negative about them doesn't break house rules).”

Sure - and FWIW I have no problems with your post itself.

I'm just trying to explain to Dome why this thread is not a personal attack.
jill1812
01-12-2010
Originally Posted by DavidJames:
“Well, I guess my question is: should we apply "acceptability" criteria to candidates at some point, even for a light entertainment show?

I mean, Anton got a lot of flak for his reported comment about Laila last year - and clearly that issue had nothing to do with dancing.”

I think everyone uses their own criteria to decide who to vote for.

Even if Ann could dance like Jill Halfpenny i wouldn't vote for her.
Mistress
01-12-2010
Originally Posted by DavidJames:
“Well, I guess my question is: should we apply "acceptability" criteria to candidates at some point, even for a light entertainment show?”

Well for some reason Ann's PR is quite good, so she's mainstream, even though her views on homosexuality are no different to e.g. Nick Griffin's. I doubt the same could be said if she'd consistently voted against equal rights for ethnic minorities.

But all that demonstrates is that homophobia is still to some extent entrenched in the system, since people can still get away with prejudice in this area without becoming massively unpopular with everyone who isn't a frothing, bigoted, BNP-style nutter.
kperdnusse
01-12-2010
Originally Posted by Philly1234:
“She's not homophobic, I don't think. That term is used too frequently. It really connotes someone (usually a man) who objects to homosexuality because they secretly fear/know that they themselves are a homosexual.

I would say her beliefs are prejudiced. She spouts particular religious party-line type anti-gay sentiments. It's sad, but it doesn't make her homophobic.”

Homophobe
Noun
1. Fear of sameness or men
2. Opposition to homosexuals and/or homosexuality

I think they both apply to BoD.
millie3
01-12-2010
Originally Posted by DavidJames:
“Well, I guess my question is: should we apply "acceptability" criteria to candidates at some point, even for a light entertainment show?

I mean, Anton got a lot of flak for his reported comment about Laila last year - and clearly that issue had nothing to do with dancing.”

I think we do privately don't we? Even if AW was the most accomplished dancer in the competition, I would not vote for her because of the sort of person she is. I don't think many people ignore personality and solely consider the dancing.
DavidJames
01-12-2010
Originally Posted by jill1812:
“She also tried to stop gay rights legislation by voting against. She is trying to force her view, that homosexuality is wrong on others, surely that equals prejudiced.”

Yes - there's some clear evidence that she has acted in ways which are consistent with homophobia. That doesn't mean she is, it just means her actions are consistent with such a view.

So I guess, to balance this, I wonder, is there any evidence that she is not homophobic?
Tommo781
01-12-2010
Originally Posted by DavidJames:
“Ah, but this isn't any old AW thread.

This is a DavidJames AW thread. ”

As I said. Not ANOTHER AW thread! The stuff on this one has been said already on many others. It is getting rather boring. :yawn:
<<
<
2 of 13
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map