DS Forums

 
 

Is Ann homophobic?


Closed Thread
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 01-12-2010, 16:55
mossy2103
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 68,698
Looking here, she has a clear record of opposition to equality legislation.

Combined with the fact that she opposed the repeal of Section 28 - introducing a wrecking amendment - in 2003, it seems clear that Ann believes that equal rights for gays are a bad thing.

So, do we think she's a homophobe, or does she simply have a set of opinions which outwardly appear homophobic?

Discuss
And this question is relevant to SCD how?
mossy2103 is offline  
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
Old 01-12-2010, 16:55
dome
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 52,176
She's religious and moral, that's her foundation. She can basically disapprove of the homosexual act but I don't see why that should also make her a hater.

I don't think this a question we can answer. I'm not defending her because I have any love for her, I don't.
Exactly.

This personal attack is as bad as the one who questioned her grief for her brother's death imo.
dome is offline  
Old 01-12-2010, 16:55
kperdnusse
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: God's own country
Posts: 263
So every practising Catholic is a homophobe, as are Muslims and various others who don't believe in gay marriage.

Interesting, there are probably many viewers that fall into that camp, but would object to that tag.
In a similar way to people who start sentences "I'm not a racist/homophobic/sexist etc but..." then go on to prove that they are exactly that, you mean?
kperdnusse is offline  
Old 01-12-2010, 16:56
DavidJames
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 5,469
Not ANOTHER AW thread!
Ah, but this isn't any old AW thread.

This is a DavidJames AW thread.
DavidJames is offline  
Old 01-12-2010, 16:56
Mistress
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 268
She's religious and moral, that's her foundation. She can basically disapprove of the homosexual act but I don't see why that should also make her a hater.
Which homosexual act? Graham Norton? Sue Perkins?
Mistress is offline  
Old 01-12-2010, 16:56
dome
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 52,176
You're taking things to extremes, I think. And you're expanding the topic. My topic is not "Is the Catholic Church homophobic?" - that;s not really relevant to this forum - but "Is Ann homophobic?".

If someone acts in a discrimatory way - and Ann clearly has done so, look at the record - are they bigotted, or not?

If they actively promote and support discriminatory measures, what would you describe them as?
She was a practising Anglican and converted to Catholicism, so it is relevant.
dome is offline  
Old 01-12-2010, 16:56
Dorabella14
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: 2 cm from Brussels
Posts: 1,477
I dunno.

If a set of beliefs includes discrimination against a particular minority, then what would you call it?

Personally, I'd call those beliefs discriminatory.
Sorry, but anybody who converts from being Anglican to Roman Catholic purely on the issue of Y/N to women priests is neither a true Anglican nor a true Catholic, just someone with very pronounced views. Her voting history has nothing to do with religion and everything to do with personal opinion.
Dorabella14 is offline  
Old 01-12-2010, 16:58
DavidJames
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 5,469
And this question is relevant to SCD how?
Ah, I'm glad you asked that.

Firstly, I'd answer that there are many threads about contestant's personal lives - e.g. the Kara / Artem one recently. So this is along the lines of those.

Secondly, I'd answer is that the reason Ann is in, is all because of her "entertainment" value. So as this entertainment is all about her personality, it's completely valid to ask questions about that personality.
DavidJames is offline  
Old 01-12-2010, 17:01
DavidJames
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 5,469
This personal attack
It's not a personal attack.

It's a question about a contestant's personality.

There's a difference.
DavidJames is offline  
Old 01-12-2010, 17:02
Noone
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 6,038
Which homosexual act? Graham Norton? Sue Perkins?
Both.
Noone is offline  
Old 01-12-2010, 17:02
-Sid-
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 28,896
Ann has actively campaigned against gay rights in parliament so she isn't really in the same boat as those religious people who think homosexuality is wrong but who hold those views privately and don't attempt to meddle in the lives of gay people.

If Ann wants to be a practicing Christian, then that's up to her. No one should stop her doing so. Why then, does she think she has a right to stop gay couples marrying and adopting children? It's none of her damn business. No one is asking her to marry a rug muncher and adopt a couple of sprogs.

She's an interfering old bigot.

But she has given me a few laughs on Strictly.
-Sid- is offline  
Old 01-12-2010, 17:02
evil dipsy
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 158
Don't know about "morally acceptable", but I wouldn't vote for her in a political election because she is homophobic, misogynist and has bonkers views on what constitutes an ideal family (which run completely counter to anthropological evidence). She therefore doesn't represent my views.

I don't vote for her in Strictly because she's shite at dancing, doesn't try and is altogether belligerent and unappealing.
This is my favourite post of the entire year.
evil dipsy is offline  
Old 01-12-2010, 17:06
Philly1234
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Not where you are
Posts: 1,263
She's not homophobic, I don't think. That term is used too frequently. It really connotes someone (usually a man) who objects to homosexuality because they secretly fear/know that they themselves are a homosexual.

I would say her beliefs are prejudiced. She spouts particular religious party-line type anti-gay sentiments. It's sad, but it doesn't make her homophobic.
Philly1234 is offline  
Old 01-12-2010, 17:10
dottigirl
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: A posher part of SW London.
Posts: 640
Don't know about "morally acceptable", but I wouldn't vote for her in a political election because she is homophobic, misogynist and has bonkers views on what constitutes an ideal family (which run completely counter to anthropological evidence). She therefore doesn't represent my views.

I don't vote for her in Strictly because she's shite at dancing, doesn't try and is altogether belligerent and unappealing.
I'd agree with that.

Sorry, but anybody who converts from being Anglican to Roman Catholic purely on the issue of Y/N to women priests is neither a true Anglican nor a true Catholic, just someone with very pronounced views. Her voting history has nothing to do with religion and everything to do with personal opinion.
Yup. Not very Christian-like at all to throw your toys out of the pram and take off either.
dottigirl is offline  
Old 01-12-2010, 17:12
DavidJames
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 5,469
Note to Dome:
She's an interfering old bigot.
Now that's a personal attack.

See the difference?
DavidJames is offline  
Old 01-12-2010, 17:15
DavidJames
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 5,469
Don't know about "morally acceptable", but I wouldn't vote for her in a political election.
Well, I guess my question is: should we apply "acceptability" criteria to candidates at some point, even for a light entertainment show?

I mean, Anton got a lot of flak for his reported comment about Laila last year - and clearly that issue had nothing to do with dancing.
DavidJames is offline  
Old 01-12-2010, 17:17
jill1812
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Tannadice
Posts: 11,736
She's not homophobic, I don't think. That term is used too frequently. It really connotes someone (usually a man) who objects to homosexuality because they secretly fear/know that they themselves are a homosexual.

I would say her beliefs are prejudiced. She spouts particular religious party-line type anti-gay sentiments. It's sad, but it doesn't make her homophobic.
She also tried to stop gay rights legislation by voting against. She is trying to force her view, that homosexuality is wrong on others, surely that equals prejudiced.
jill1812 is offline  
Old 01-12-2010, 17:18
-Sid-
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 28,896
Note to Dome:


Now that's a personal attack.

See the difference?
People attack with their views on here all the time. The stars of the show are fair game as far as I'm concerned (and being negative about them doesn't break house rules).

I never attack other forum users though.
-Sid- is offline  
Old 01-12-2010, 17:20
DavidJames
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 5,469
People attack with their views on here all the time. The stars of the show are fair game as far as I'm concerned (and being negative about them doesn't break house rules).
Sure - and FWIW I have no problems with your post itself.

I'm just trying to explain to Dome why this thread is not a personal attack.
DavidJames is offline  
Old 01-12-2010, 17:20
jill1812
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Tannadice
Posts: 11,736
Well, I guess my question is: should we apply "acceptability" criteria to candidates at some point, even for a light entertainment show?

I mean, Anton got a lot of flak for his reported comment about Laila last year - and clearly that issue had nothing to do with dancing.
I think everyone uses their own criteria to decide who to vote for.

Even if Ann could dance like Jill Halfpenny i wouldn't vote for her.
jill1812 is offline  
Old 01-12-2010, 17:21
Mistress
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 268
Well, I guess my question is: should we apply "acceptability" criteria to candidates at some point, even for a light entertainment show?
Well for some reason Ann's PR is quite good, so she's mainstream, even though her views on homosexuality are no different to e.g. Nick Griffin's. I doubt the same could be said if she'd consistently voted against equal rights for ethnic minorities.

But all that demonstrates is that homophobia is still to some extent entrenched in the system, since people can still get away with prejudice in this area without becoming massively unpopular with everyone who isn't a frothing, bigoted, BNP-style nutter.
Mistress is offline  
Old 01-12-2010, 17:21
kperdnusse
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: God's own country
Posts: 263
She's not homophobic, I don't think. That term is used too frequently. It really connotes someone (usually a man) who objects to homosexuality because they secretly fear/know that they themselves are a homosexual.

I would say her beliefs are prejudiced. She spouts particular religious party-line type anti-gay sentiments. It's sad, but it doesn't make her homophobic.
Homophobe
Noun
1. Fear of sameness or men
2. Opposition to homosexuals and/or homosexuality

I think they both apply to BoD.
kperdnusse is offline  
Old 01-12-2010, 17:22
millie3
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,106
Well, I guess my question is: should we apply "acceptability" criteria to candidates at some point, even for a light entertainment show?

I mean, Anton got a lot of flak for his reported comment about Laila last year - and clearly that issue had nothing to do with dancing.
I think we do privately don't we? Even if AW was the most accomplished dancer in the competition, I would not vote for her because of the sort of person she is. I don't think many people ignore personality and solely consider the dancing.
millie3 is offline  
Old 01-12-2010, 17:22
DavidJames
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 5,469
She also tried to stop gay rights legislation by voting against. She is trying to force her view, that homosexuality is wrong on others, surely that equals prejudiced.
Yes - there's some clear evidence that she has acted in ways which are consistent with homophobia. That doesn't mean she is, it just means her actions are consistent with such a view.

So I guess, to balance this, I wonder, is there any evidence that she is not homophobic?
DavidJames is offline  
Old 01-12-2010, 17:23
Tommo781
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,726
Ah, but this isn't any old AW thread.

This is a DavidJames AW thread.
As I said. Not ANOTHER AW thread! The stuff on this one has been said already on many others. It is getting rather boring. :yawn:
Tommo781 is offline  
 
Closed Thread




 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 06:46.