• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • Strictly Come Dancing
Is Ann homophobic?
<<
<
6 of 13
>>
>
Vivacious Lady
01-12-2010
Originally Posted by Glowbot:
“ voting against equal rights when you are a politician is actually more damaging to society than beating gays up imo. In the long term at least.”

Really? I think more damaging are the pernicious prejudices (sometimes quite subtle and unspoken) that pervade our society. I wouldn't imagine anyone has hesitated about declaring their sexuality because of Ann's views. They're more likely to hesitate because of worries about what their friends and family might think. You can legislate to provide more choices in lifestyle, but you can't legislate to make those choices easy.
DavidJames
01-12-2010
Originally Posted by bobajot:
“Like I said I don't know what the word means”

Um, don't you think it might be worth finding out what it means, before commenting on whether you think she is or not?

But, OK, here's a definition from Wikipedia:

Quote:
“Homophobia is a range of negative attitudes and feelings towards lesbian, gay, bisexual, queer, and in some cases transgender and intersex people. Definitions refer variably to antipathy, contempt, prejudice, aversion, and irrational fear.

Homophobia is observable in critical and hostile behavior such as discrimination and violence on the basis of a perceived non-heterosexual orientation. In a 1998 address, author, activist, and civil rights leader Coretta Scott King stated that "Homophobia is like racism and anti-Semitism and other forms of bigotry in that it seeks to dehumanize a large group of people, to deny their humanity, their dignity and personhood."”

(My bold, for obvious reasons)
j4Rose
01-12-2010
Originally Posted by bobajot:
“Like I said I don't know what the word means roughly translated it would be a fear of homosexuals. I don't think AW fears anyone.”

It contains the word "phobia" but it isn't necessarily a fear of anything. It has a wider meaning than that.
Glowbot
01-12-2010
Originally Posted by bobajot:
“You are way past an acceptable discussion phase where is your evidence.”

Sorry, thought it was common knowledge
http://www.theyworkforyou.com/mp/ann..._and_the_weald

Voted very strongly against equal gay rights.


break down
http://www.publicwhip.org.uk/mp.php?mpid=1701&dmp=826

Originally Posted by j4Rose:
“What are you basing that on? The fact that she's never had sex could mean that she has huge issues with sex or men. It could also just have been her choice. OK, I do think she is repressed, but the fact that she has never had sex with men doesn't mean that she's a lesbian.”

It's just my opinion and I am basing it on the Louis Theroux documentary and her close female friend she didn't want to talk about.
Glowbot
01-12-2010
Originally Posted by Three Left Feet:
“Really?

Would you prefer a society where the homosexual age of consent is 16 and homosexuals can marry but where widespread violence against homosexuals is the norm, or one where violence is minimised by means of education of the masses and robust policing, but where the age of consent is 18 etc?”

that's a false dichotomy...
Not sure what you mean because she voted against promoting homosexuality in schools and special protection for LGBT bullying.
http://www.publicwhip.org.uk/divisio...&house=commons

These are some AW quotes;

I think it wrong that there should be overt discrimination. Where I differ is that I do not think that it can be promoted as an equally valid lifestyle to marriage, but I would say the same about irregular heterosexual arrangements.

Section 28 : No I don't think it should be repealed at all. I think it is wrong to promote those sort of lifestyles and the accent is on promote. I think you have to have a preferred model.
drbolognaise
01-12-2010
Originally Posted by Glowbot:
“


It's just my opinion and I am basing it on the Louis Theroux documentary and her close female friend she didn't want to talk about.”

I must admit, I did think she was a lesbian but that isnt based on any evidence...rather based on my (mostly accurate) gaydar!
Tangerine_82
01-12-2010
Originally Posted by bobajot:
“I've no idea how Ann's fans feel and neither have you. I wouldn't have thought a detailed check on her past was necessary for most. Being labelled does not concern me one jot. I don't care about things gay why should I be concerned about 6% of the population or whatever it is. I don't care about Moslem's either. What we have constantly is the tail wagging the dog. They are no more special than anyone else. Your last point it has no relevance. People enjoy watching a former upper echelon politician sliding about on her butt. That's the relevant bit”

Well eventually you answered my question - you don't care, you just want to see her make a fool of herself. Thank you for answering.
Three Left Feet
01-12-2010
Originally Posted by Glowbot:
“that's a false dichotomy...
Not sure what you mean because she voted...”

I was commenting on your post 116 where you appeared to classify suppression of rights for homosexuals as worse than violence against homosexuals and thus the comment had nothing to do with Ann.
jinx2
01-12-2010
Originally Posted by Tangerine_82:
“Well eventually you answered my question - you don't care, you just want to see her make a fool of herself. Thank you for answering.”

Please do not take that one post and hold it up as the typical.
Some people who vote for AW agree with her views whole heartily. Others agree with some but not all, others still don't care and some don't know anything about her. And some do not think politics have anything to do with a light entertainment television program.
Tangerine_82
01-12-2010
Originally Posted by jinx2:
“Please do not take that one post and hold it up as the typical.
Some people who vote for AW agree with her views whole heartily. Others agree with some but not all, others still don't care and some don't know anything about her. And some do not think politics have anything to do with a light entertainment television program.”

I won't and wouldn't I appreciate that in amongst her voters are all kinds of different people with different considerations, I do. I just wanted to know what the ones defending her on this thread thought in particular.
Gill P
01-12-2010
Originally Posted by millie3:
“Yes she is homophobic based on her history in politics. She's anti a lot of things though isn't she i.e. female bishops. She's also phobic about being thought 'suggestive' as if that could ever happen!”

It is not just female bishops she is against, but also female priests. That is one of the reason why she joined the Catholic Church - not a good enough reason in my mind.
Glowbot
01-12-2010
Originally Posted by Three Left Feet:
“I was commenting on your post 116 where you appeared to classify suppression of rights for homosexuals as worse than violence against homosexuals and thus the comment had nothing to do with Ann.”

oh right I see what you mean... I just think that actively taking away equality from everyone actually promotes discrimination from more people, as well as harms society.

You make legislation to ensure a gay can never be equal to a straight person, that does more harm than just punching him/her.
In fact, telling everyone "this person is not equal" makes other people inclined to harm them.

Again, just my opinion.
Mistress
01-12-2010
Imagine if, in an alternative universe, Ann Widdecombe had voted strongly against equal rights for black people, whenever she had the chance.

Imagine if she had also written several articles and made speeches declaring that her "preferred model" for society was white only.

It's the exact same kind of bigotry (arbitrarily deciding that a section of society is inferior to another and discriminating against them), but I'd bet she wouldn't have been asked to be on Strictly in that universe.

Fact is, homophobia is brushed under the carpet way more than racism. Look at the way Brucie is never hauled over the coals for frequently expressing his distaste of homosexuals. Imagine if he made snide comments about Alesha's race in the same way he does about Craig and Bruno's sexuality.
Tangerine_82
01-12-2010
Originally Posted by Glowbot:
“oh right I see what you mean... I just think that actively taking away equality from everyone actually promotes discrimination from more people, as well as harms society.

You make legislation to ensure a gay can never be equal to a straight person, that does more harm than just punching him/her.
In fact, telling everyone "this person is not equal" makes other people inclined to harm them.
Again, just my opinion.”

I totally agree. It's institutionalised bigotry and it's sad that in this day and age there are still people who don't see a problem with it.
Glowbot
01-12-2010
Originally Posted by Tangerine_82:
“I totally agree. It's institutionalised bigotry and it's sad that in this day and age there are still people who don't see a problem with it.”

Yes, exactly. It's because she was in a position of power that makes it so reprehensible.

To think the current equalities minister also used to be the same (but now claims she changed her mind) is worrying too.
bobajot
01-12-2010
Originally Posted by Tangerine_82:
“I think the word you were looking for is abortion. It's not butchering and I would appreciate it if you wouldn't spew that kind of bile here.”

Why that's how a lot of people see it. There are 600,000 hits on google linking the words.
Tangerine_82
01-12-2010
Originally Posted by bobajot:
“Why that's how a lot of people see it. There are 600,000 hits on google linking the words.”

Well in Germany in the 1930s there were hundreds of thousands of people who thought Jews were evil. Doesn't make it true though.
Mistress
01-12-2010
Originally Posted by bobajot:
“Why that's how a lot of people see it. There are 600,000 hits on google linking the words.”

Heh, the lazy journo's fail safe first paragraph.
Three Left Feet
01-12-2010
Originally Posted by Tangerine_82:
“I totally agree. It's institutionalised bigotry and it's sad that in this day and age there are still people who don't see a problem with it.”

Just to emphasise, I see a problem; I just don't think it's as big a problem as violence against homosexuals.

I don't think anyone has died from not being able to legally partake of homosexual sex until the age of 18, whereas plenty of people have died after having the sh*t kicked out of them on a Friday night for not conforming.

I doubt the perpetrators of such violence against homsexuals would have been less likely to carry out their actions had the age of consent been 16.
HeidiB
01-12-2010
Ann only became a catholic because she did not want women ministers in the Church of England.

So as well as not liking gays she doesn't want women to have equality with men.
Mistress
01-12-2010
Originally Posted by Three Left Feet:
“Just to emphasise, I see a problem; I just don't think it's as big a problem as violence against homosexuals.

I don't think anyone has died from not being able to legally partake of homosexual sex until the age of 18, whereas plenty of people have died after having the sh*t kicked out of them on a Friday night for not conforming.

I doubt the perpetrators of such violence against homsexuals would have been less likely to carry out their actions had the age of consent been 16.”

Yes but this is a bit of a false equivalence. The vast majority of gay people will never be beaten up, but almost all of them will experience not having the same rights under the law as straight people.
Glowbot
01-12-2010
Originally Posted by bobajot:
“Why that's how a lot of people see it. There are 600,000 hits on google linking the words.”

Argument from numbers now? you love the logical fallacies, are you a christian or something?

Why not let the person with the uterus decide if it's butchery, instead of letting them decide it isn't and getting a backstreet abortion.

btw, things linking "animal & porn" 2,510,000 results.
Tangerine_82
01-12-2010
Originally Posted by Three Left Feet:
“Just to emphasise, I see a problem; I just don't think it's as big a problem as violence against homosexuals.

I don't think anyone has died from not being able to legally partake of homosexual sex until the age of 18, whereas plenty of people have died after having the sh*t kicked out of them on a Friday night for not conforming.

I doubt the perpetrators of such violence against homsexuals would have been less likely to carry out their actions had the age of consent been 16.”

I think both are problems in different ways. Violence is the immediate problem, institutionalised bigotry is the mechanism through which the immediate problems arise.
Tangerine_82
01-12-2010
Originally Posted by Glowbot:
“btw, things linking "animal & porn" 2,510,000 results.”

LOL!
drbolognaise
01-12-2010
Originally Posted by bobajot:
“Why that's how a lot of people see it. There are 600,000 hits on google linking the words.”

This isnt the first time I find myself forced to press the Alert Mods button on a post related to this subject made by yourself.
<<
<
6 of 13
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map