• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • TV Shows: Reality
  • The Apprentice
Is Stella a bitch?
<<
<
3 of 6
>>
>
parthy
01-12-2010
Originally Posted by Sherlock_Holmes:
“She is given the same treatment as Adam and Kristina in Series 3 (everyone ignoring her in the house) ”

I mean to the general public she's not considered an underdog, performance-wise.
DuaneBenzie
01-12-2010
Originally Posted by evil dipsy:
“damn. if I'd waited a minute I could have just let Duane speak for me ”

Sorry. I missed your post in this thread which mirrors mine I don't get why Joanna is being used as support for Stella either, especially where Liz is concerned because of that hug.

Furthermore, to test this Liz and Chris are intimidated and threatened by Stella farce even further, why are both Liz and Chris not equally intimidated and threatened by Joanna, who is on balance a stronger contestant than Stella and also very much her own person?
-Sid-
01-12-2010
Stella a bitch? No.

Slightly over-rated? Possibly.

But then apart from Jonna, none of the others are especially talented so a Stella win would be ok by me and quite satisfying given how the others are treating her.
parthy
01-12-2010
Originally Posted by DuaneBenzie:
“Sorry. I missed your post in this thread which mirrors mine I don't get why Joanna is being used as support for Stella either, especially where Liz is concerned because of that hug.

Furthermore, to test this Liz and Chris are intimidated and threatened by Stella farce even further, why are both Liz and Chris not equally intimidated and threatened by Joanna, who is on balance a stronger contestant than Stella and also very much her own person?”

Who knows why they've decided to pick on Stella? Maybe they think Joanna would defend herself more vigourously? Maybe Stella keeps to herself in the house and it irks them?
Sherlock_Holmes
01-12-2010
Originally Posted by parthy:
“I mean to the general public she's not considered an underdog, performance-wise.”

Yeah, cause both these bitch threads are about their performances
evil dipsy
01-12-2010
If only we could see the entire footage from the house we'd have much more insight into the housemates and their relationships. Someone could behave like Genghis Khan in the house and we wouldn't know it.
mary patricia
01-12-2010
Originally Posted by Sherlock_Holmes:
“Yeah, it is obvious that Stella is not liked at all in the house. Unlike Laura, she canīt even relax in the house (as noted at the opening segment of the episode).”

Laura might have been liked in the house but I wonder how people will feel about her when they come out and see all the footage of Laura bitching about them behind their backs? Laura comes across as a lovely person to the other contestants but it's clear that she's a passive aggressive whinger, who shirks responsibility and will point the finger at whoever she deems the weakest link.

Quote:
“Strangely enough, when Stella was being bitchy towards Stuart the other week people were applauding ”

There's a big difference though. Stuart and Stella had being taking pops at each other all day and winding each other up. On the You're Fired show, it showd a clip where the two were working in the office and Stuart called her "Mum" and then he kept making a big deal out of her being 31 in the boardroom (she's 30). Stuart well deserved that comment and he knew it. Liz had her chance to talk to Stella in private about any issues she had with what was said in the boardroom. Instead she did it in the most unprofessional and immature manner - she did it infront of everyone else
LaurieMarlow
01-12-2010
Originally Posted by brangdon:
“Stella's performance hasn't been intimidating. She's almost always been paired with Joanna, who is impressive; it's tempting to say she's been riding Joanna's coattails. I think Chris had a point. Stella has had a good record, avoiding the boardroom, without doing much to earn it. She had two wins as PMs basically through luck and the other team going wrong. It's hard to point to anything she's done that justifies her place. It's good that she's finally been brought into the boardroom.

If you are the sort to undermine those who threaten you, surely they should undermine Liz or Joanna?”

If luck is part of their skillset then you want them on your team.

Stella's two pm wins are the strongest ammunition she's got. It's difficult to argue with two wins and actually her own personal contribution in both those tasks was very good. I think you're undermining her here.
cath99
01-12-2010
I don't really know where Liz has the reputation that she's one of the strongest candidates, twice now she's made big errors that have contributed to her team failing. I'm also starting to think Stella might not be as excellent as some first thought.

Joanna stands head and shoulders above them both I think.
evil dipsy
01-12-2010
Mary - the most unproffessional manner would be behind her back in front of everyone else. Whilst I'd like to think I'd have taken Stella aside if I'd been in Liz's position, I think it more likely I'd have bitched behind her back. I'm honest enough to admit that and I think the majority of other folks would to. Still it;s just a show and their bitch fight will make for entertaining viewing
evil dipsy
01-12-2010
You're right Cath. Joanne's stock hasd been rising for a few tasks now. Laura only stayed in the last couple of weeks because of Joanne's sale skills.
brangdon
01-12-2010
Originally Posted by LaurieMarlow:
“If luck is part of their skillset then you want them on your team.”

The thing about luck is that it's not reliable. Being lucky in the past doesn't mean she'll be lucky in the future. That's how luck differs from talent.

Quote:
“Stella's two pm wins are the strongest ammunition she's got.”

Sad but true. Her first win was in the second task, where Laura did everything wrong and yet would still have won had she only had the sense to accept the Boots deal. Her second win was in German, when she had the power-houses of Joanna and Stuart working for her. They got her 9 appointments to the other team's 6, and the crucial 9am appointment - a huge advantage.

Aside from this thin soup, she really hasn't done anything to justify her place.
parthy
01-12-2010
Originally Posted by brangdon:
“The thing about luck is that it's not reliable. Being lucky in the past doesn't mean she'll be lucky in the future. That's how luck differs from talent.

Sad but true. Her first win was in the second task, where Laura did everything wrong and yet would still have won had she only had the sense to accept the Boots deal. Her second win was in German, when she had the power-houses of Joanna and Stuart working for her. They got her 9 appointments to the other team's 6, and the crucial 9am appointment - a huge advantage.

Aside from this thin soup, she really hasn't done anything to justify her place.”

The German task was a good win.
James Martin 2
02-12-2010
I can't say I like her. I don't find her that attractive either whereas Laura and Liz, I'd destroy. At the same time.
Sherlock_Holmes
02-12-2010
Originally Posted by mary patricia:
“There's a big difference though. Stuart and Stella had being taking pops at each other all day and winding each other up. On the You're Fired show, it showd a clip where the two were working in the office and Stuart called her "Mum" and then he kept making a big deal out of her being 31 in the boardroom (she's 30). Stuart well deserved that comment and he knew it.”

Yeah, that sexist swine

I believed that people would at least agree that double standards are used, but not even that
parthy
02-12-2010
Originally Posted by Sherlock_Holmes:
“Yeah, that sexist swine

I believed that people would at least agree that double standards are used, but not even that ”

Did you choose to ignore the rest of Mary Patricia's post?
mary patricia
02-12-2010
Originally Posted by brangdon:
“The thing about luck is that it's not reliable. Being lucky in the past doesn't mean she'll be lucky in the future. That's how luck differs from talent.

Sad but true. Her first win was in the second task, where Laura did everything wrong and yet would still have won had she only had the sense to accept the Boots deal. Her second win was in German, when she had the power-houses of Joanna and Stuart working for her. They got her 9 appointments to the other team's 6, and the crucial 9am appointment - a huge advantage.

Aside from this thin soup, she really hasn't done anything to justify her place.”

I don't think it was luck or just the appointments that won them that task. When the two research teams went to Germany, they both said curry/sausage/pakrika crisps. I remember Joanna repeating it about 4 or 5 times. Joanna still went with the British themed crisps and this is why they went down well. Lord Alan commented in the boardroom that the German's weren't best blessed with the other team's poor effort, simply because they already had massive established brands in those flavours and it almost felt patronising being sold German crisps by a British company. The British crisps sold because they were original. Stella made that call and it was a risk. I remember at the time when Joanna was telling her on the phone I was thinking "if she doesn't listen to Joanna, she will deserve to be fired when they loose". How wrong was I?
Sherlock_Holmes
02-12-2010
Originally Posted by parthy:
“Did you choose to ignore the rest of Mary Patricia's post?”

Sorry, but I donīt have a choice as to which part of the post I wish to reply on

If you must really know, those kind of comments are always made when the group is together in the living room (unlike the US version, perhaps it is staged that way?). Remember that verbal attack that James made towards Ben last year (also got a round of applause, go figure!)?
parthy
02-12-2010
Originally Posted by Sherlock_Holmes:
“Sorry, but I donīt have a choice as to which part of the post I wish to reply on
”

When it gives some explanation as to why the Stuart/Stella situation was different, it's daft to ignore it. But who said you didn't have a choice? Put away that confused emote.
Sherlock_Holmes
02-12-2010
Originally Posted by parthy:
“When it gives some explanation as to why the Stuart/Stella situation was different, it's daft to ignore it.”

But it didnīt explain it???



Originally Posted by parthy:
“Put away that confused emote.”

Yes, mother.
parthy
02-12-2010
Originally Posted by Sherlock_Holmes:
“But it didnīt explain it???
”

Yes, it did. Stuart and Stella were needling each other all day.
notary
02-12-2010
It didnt look like LS liked Stella at all. The girls didnt seem to bargain at all. Considering they phoned in advance why didnt they ask the prices or isnt that allowed. They spent 2 hours phoning round, they should have managed to find more than one stockists of the items. How is it they didnt look for truffles on the phone.
Sherlock_Holmes
02-12-2010
Originally Posted by parthy:
“Yes, it did. Stuart and Stella were needling each other all day.”

So, then you can still work it out in private or does that justify a public humiliation. A spade is a spade.

Also, people are saying that Liz is turning the others against Stella, but it is obvious from comments (Laura, Stubags, Chris) that they already didnīt like her at all.

Actually, I hope that both Stella and Liz will go out at the interview stage, but for different reasons (Liz would probably be lynched if she made it to the final, Katie Hopkins is a kitten compared to some of the reactions tonight).
parthy
02-12-2010
Originally Posted by Sherlock_Holmes:
“Actually, I hope that both Stella and Liz will go out at the interview stage, but for different reasons (Liz would probably be lynched if she made it to the final, Katie Hopkins is a kitten compared to some of the reactions tonight).”

OK, now you're really being silly.
Dollystanford
02-12-2010
Originally Posted by Sherlock_Holmes:
“Also, people are saying that Liz is turning the others against Stella, but it is obvious from comments (Laura, Stubags, Chris) that they already didnīt like her at all.
”

that's what made it more unpleasant for me - she knew she was safe making those comments because she knew Stella wouldn't get any back up

would be interested if she'd do the same with a more popular candidate - my guess is no
<<
<
3 of 6
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map