Originally Posted by lovecat86:
“No it isn't, but even if it were she can sing better than the lot of them and she can rap too, and she's diverse. Matt and Rebecca do the same kinda crap every week and when Matt tries to do something different a la Beatles week, it's a disaster! Mary has fluffed it more times than I care to remember and Wand Erection mime so badly during the choruses it's actually laughable people buy it. I'm aware Cher doesn't appeal to the masses, but she CAN sing. That is all.”
LMAO. Rebecca, Mary and Matt are far, far, far superior vocalists to Cher. And so what if she can rap? It's not the Rap Factor. Matt can do amazing falsetto and Rebecca is jazzy, but it's not the Falsetto Factor or the Jazz Factor either
Cher fluffed it at JH and should never have made it through in the first place. She's also been in the sing off and relied on the one thing that "isn't her" -
a ballad. Hardly twisting it up and "original" when she needs it, eh?
Matt is more versatile than the lot of them - as for doing the same old crap every week, you couldn't be more wrong. He's done the guitar, he's done big productions, he's done TWO dance tracks, ballads and songs by males and females. Cher was sh*te singing Imagine (and you can't use the ballad argument for the reason I explained above) and the Elton John massacre was just terrible. She's also got a terrible attitude that doesn't endear her to the public - she has her obsessed and her dedicated fans but you need to pick up floating votes to win this. She won't. The rest of her performances have been exactly the same. Rapping with a bit of singing thrown in, with huge productions and mad outfits/makeup to distract from her very weak vocals.
If we know what ANYONE is going to do from week to week, it's Cher