• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • Strictly Come Dancing
Kara vs Pamela
<<
<
4 of 5
>>
>
lach doch mal
09-12-2010
Originally Posted by millie3:
“Not obese of course but quite solid”

... so do you seriously think he cannot lift her because in your opinion she is solid. Again it's technique, and she isn't fat and he has already lifted her, so what is your point.
millie3
09-12-2010
Originally Posted by lach doch mal:
“... so do you seriously think he cannot lift her because in your opinion she is solid. Again it's technique, and she isn't fat and he has already lifted her, so what is your point.”

My point is that generally the show dance contains many very big lifts which they may find difficult. Of course some is technique but not all. I seem to remember Vincent not including many lifts with Natalie for the same reason in at least 1 of their dances?
lach doch mal
09-12-2010
Originally Posted by millie3:
“My point is that generally the show dance contains many very big lifts which they may find difficult. Of course some is technique but not all. I seem to remember Vincent not including many lifts with Natalie for the same reason in at least 1 of their dances?”

Natalie didn't lose as much weight as Pamela (who I think has now quite a lovely figure, not painfully thin but a bit curvy), secondly James has already lifted Pamela (and she him), so comparing them to Vincent and Natalie (who didn't include many or even any lifts) is (excuse me I don't mean this offensively) pointless.

Thirdly, I don't want a routine with stupid lifts just for the sake of it (I loved Mark Ramprakash, but the lifts were over the top), last year Natalie had Ricky lift her over the head (which looked like weightlifting), Gavin's lift went wrong etc.

James is quite strong, he will be able to lift her, but maybe he will think in terms of choreography and won't include silly lifts just for the sake of it.
millie3
09-12-2010
Originally Posted by lach doch mal:
“Natalie didn't lose as much weight as Pamela (who I think has now quite a lovely figure, not painfully thin but a bit curvy), secondly James has already lifted Pamela (and she him), so comparing them to Vincent and Natalie (who didn't include many or even any lifts) is (excuse me I don't mean this offensively) pointless.

Thirdly, I don't want a routine with stupid lifts just for the sake of it (I loved Mark Ramprakash, but the lifts were over the top), last year Natalie had Ricky lift her over the head (which looked like weightlifting), Gavin's lift went wrong etc.

James is quite strong, he will be able to lift her, but maybe he will think in terms of choreography and won't include silly lifts just for the sake of it.”

James has already lifted Pamela but not the type of lifts usually seen in the showdance. I'm sure if they get to the final he will make sure to only include lifts such as already been included in their dances. The worse scenario would be to try anything too daring and end up looking like Brendan's.
lach doch mal
09-12-2010
Originally Posted by millie3:
“James has already lifted Pamela but not the type of lifts usually seen in the showdance. I'm sure if they get to the final he will make sure to only include lifts such as already been included in their dances. The worse scenario would be to try anything too daring and end up looking like Brendan's.”

We agree there, this is always a possibility and all the other couples are in danger of doing this (e.g. Ricky and Natalie last year). I hope they won't. About the other point, I think we have to agree to disagree here. There is no evidence that James cannot lift Pamela, and I have already said what I think about this so called spectacular lifts. Additionally I believe that some of the lower lifts may be more difficult than some of the higher ones (speak to a weight lifter, if you can get the target high enough, you can lock your arms). Holding a weight on a lower level can be more difficult. I think I wait for one of the dance experts to cast doubt on James/Pamela's lift abilities.
The Swampster
09-12-2010
Are big lifts essential for a successful show dance anyway? I don't remember any big ones in Camilla and Tom's: certainly any lifts weren't the focus of the dance - it was more about the storytelling – and Pamela and James have shown themselves to be rather good at that.
Starpuss
09-12-2010
Originally Posted by The Swampster:
“Are big lifts essential for a successful show dance anyway? I don't remember any big ones in Camilla and Tom's: certainly any lifts weren't the focus of the dance - it was more about the storytelling – and Pamela and James have shown themselves to be rather good at that.”

I agree that lifts are not the be all and end of of ashowdance. I think we all remember Lisa and Brendan Less lifts there would have been a blessing.

Lifts are over rated. If they fit in with the dance then they can be lovely but just flinging someone randomly into the air every once in a while is pointless and actually often spoils the flow of a routine. Of course as the audience clap like performing seals everytime someone so much as lifts their feet off the floor then I suspect we will have many lifts to 'look forward' to
nagel84
09-12-2010
Kara by a country mile.
Monaogg
09-12-2010
The show dance especially should flow from one thing to the next and compliment the talent of the celebrity.

Most winners have managed this really well.
ElectraPalatine
09-12-2010
Kara. The prospect of Pamela Stephenson in any way representing my gender is horrifying.
StrictlyRed
09-12-2010
Kara, definitely
Muggsy
09-12-2010
Originally Posted by ElectraPalatine:
“Kara. The prospect of Pamela Stephenson in any way representing my gender is horrifying.”

Oh yes, I don't want to be represented in any way by Pamela.
astropoet
09-12-2010
Originally Posted by petertard:
“The two females left. Who would be better representing women in the final, as a dancer ?”

Both. Both are awesome and I love them!
reclinewithme
09-12-2010
Kara. I can't understand why the judges don't rave about her the way they do Pamela. Yes, Pamela is brilliant in her spins and shapings, amazingly strong and supple for 61, and the joy she obviously feels when she dances is wonderful to see. But Kara is just in another league again - she just looks perfect, to me.
JStevie28
09-12-2010
Kara all the way
SCD-Observer
09-12-2010
Kara yay, Pamela nay!
lamblinmerc
09-12-2010
Originally Posted by reclinewithme:
“Kara. I can't understand why the judges don't rave about her the way they do Pamela. Yes, Pamela is brilliant in her spins and shapings, amazingly strong and supple for 61, and the joy she obviously feels when she dances is wonderful to see. But Kara is just in another league again - she just looks perfect, to me.”

I think you'll find she's not married to an 'icon'....not exactly my cup of tea, and i'm scottish!

its all people politics...plain and very seemples....
fiffy35
09-12-2010
Originally Posted by nagel84:
“Kara by a country mile.”

Totally agree!
Emz1
09-12-2010
agree with ya reclinewithme

but you know what us british are like we like the under dog and the one that has the JOURNEY!:yawn: lol not me though why cant the best dancer win isnt that what the show is about call me naive?!
jill1812
09-12-2010
Originally Posted by -Sid-:
“Kara's a chameleon, Pamela lacks versatility.

Also, I prefer Kara's slightly more understated style of performing. She doesn't overdo it. By contrast, I think Pamela can be a bit over-dramatic.”

This.

Although I'd rather have them both in the final with Matt.
jill1812
09-12-2010
Originally Posted by lach doch mal:
“We agree there, this is always a possibility and all the other couples are in danger of doing this (e.g. Ricky and Natalie last year). I hope they won't. About the other point, I think we have to agree to disagree here. There is no evidence that James cannot lift Pamela, and I have already said what I think about this so called spectacular lifts. Additionally I believe that some of the lower lifts may be more difficult than some of the higher ones (speak to a weight lifter, if you can get the target high enough, you can lock your arms). Holding a weight on a lower level can be more difficult. I think I wait for one of the dance experts to cast doubt on James/Pamela's lift abilities.”

I love the lift's that Kara did in her salsa, they worked completely with the dance. So did Matt's in his AS.

I think the way James choreographs the lifts won't take over, if lifts are there then they fit in the dance not the other way round.
yenston
10-12-2010
Kara definitely. Don't rate Pamela much. I actually think she peaked at the beginning and I haven't seen much improvement. She's been overmarked way too much in the last few weeks.Kara has been undermarked from the start.
lach doch mal
10-12-2010
Originally Posted by jill1812:
“I love the lift's that Kara did in her salsa, they worked completely with the dance. So did Matt's in his AS.

I think the way James choreographs the lifts won't take over, if lifts are there then they fit in the dance not the other way round.”

I don't remember any of the lifts this year, apart from Gavin's mishap. Must look them up on youtube. Actually the fact that i don't remember them is a good thing IMO, because it means they must have fitted the dance.

I agree about the last bit as well.
Taz93
10-12-2010
Originally Posted by yenston:
“Kara definitely. Don't rate Pamela much. I actually think she peaked at the beginning and I haven't seen much improvement. She's been overmarked way too much in the last few weeks.Kara has been undermarked from the start.”

100% agree.
Rose-2010
10-12-2010
Kara, by far. I don't quite get what people see in Pamela, I have thought that she is has been overmarked many times.
<<
<
4 of 5
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map