• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • Strictly Come Dancing
Strictly Come Farce- Another overmarking for pamela
<<
<
3 of 8
>>
>
SCDchick
11-12-2010
Originally Posted by shefair:
“I agree with the OP, not once have I thought Pamela's dancing has deserved a 40 , for me each time there was something wrong or missing in the dance and I have never been moved by her dancing.

I will admit that technically she is very good but she really does not have that special oomph that makes a dance memorable and joyous”

Thanks, i wanted people to respond who have a similar view to me, not to have the thread crashed by Pamela fans
lach doch mal
11-12-2010
Originally Posted by SCDchick:
“I just think its strange that you and a few others have crashed into this thread i posted as i havent noticed you doing that elsewhere. I think my post was well said, but whatever lets just enjoy the dances ”

I haven't crashed into your thread. I gave you my opinon and then we had a jolly interaction about wine etc. It was supposed to be fun, nothing else. If I had been the OP I would have been pleased. Or were you expecting everyone to agree with you? I don't have any problems with you, you can have your opinion and none of the three of us attacked you. So please stop being so sensitive. I still know that you cannot register within an hour, though, so I was surprised about your opening post. Normally DS needs to have 24 hours ot verify your email address etc. Nothing wrong with that! And nothing wrong with your criticims of Pamela, but if you take DS that serious you are on the wrong forum. Threads sometimes just degenerate into somethin funny, and it's much better than if they degenerate into something nasty. If you have a problem with that, you should not be posting on a forum, because you will get much more hassle from other corners of this forum. The three of us were harmless and just a bit jolly.
lach doch mal
11-12-2010
Originally Posted by SCDchick:
“Thanks, i wanted people to respond who have a similar view to me, not to have the thread crashed by Pamela fans”

Well the world is an unfair place, how come that people who disagree with you, post on this thread. I would put a proviso into the thread title next time.
brendan's girl
11-12-2010
We've actually been quite tame darling.

I've seen other threads similar to this about other competiors ripped apart by fans of the person it is against.

I'd say we've been pretty jovial
slappers r us
11-12-2010
Originally Posted by TylerTango:
“http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lQLODYQBVJg&feature=sub - Kara

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SvMXX..._order&list=UL - Pamela

No contest, whatsoever. Disgrace.”

agreed
lach doch mal
11-12-2010
Originally Posted by brendan's girl:
“We've actually been quite tame darling.

I've seen other threads similar to this about other competiors ripped apart by fans of the person it is against.

I'd say we've been pretty jovial ”

Well, I'm probably cliquey darling, but don't waste your breath
Aeryn
11-12-2010
Originally Posted by SCDchick:
“Thanks, i wanted people to respond who have a similar view to me, not to have the thread crashed by Pamela fans”

When you post a thread on this forum like that, you can expect so called Pamela fans to comment on it. If you can't handle that, then maybe posting on a forum isn't for you.
SCDchick
11-12-2010
Originally Posted by lach doch mal:
“I haven't crashed into your thread. I gave you my opinon and then we had a jolly interaction about wine etc. It was supposed to be fun, nothing else. If I had been the OP I would have been pleased. Or were you expecting everyone to agree with you? I don't have any problems with you, you can have your opinion and none of the three of us attacked you. So please stop being so sensitive. I still know that you cannot register within an hour, though, so I was surprised about your opening post. Normally DS needs to have 24 hours ot verify your email address etc. Nothing wrong with that! And nothing wrong with your criticims of Pamela, but if you take DS that serious you are on the wrong forum. Threads sometimes just degenerate into somethin funny, and it's much better than if they degenerate into something nasty. If you have a problem with that, you should not be posting on a forum, because you will get much more hassle from other corners of this forum. The three of us were harmless and just a bit jolly.”

ok, enjoy your night
brendan's girl
11-12-2010
Originally Posted by lach doch mal:
“Well, I'm probably cliquey darling, but don't waste your breath”

As if we're cliquey

How is your guinea pig by the way?
fiffy35
11-12-2010
Not sure if I've been here yet but this is what I though a QS was:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e9a_omDQkjE

Bearing in mind that Kara & Artem got marked down by Len for not dancing 60/40 hold/out of hold for their AS, why wasn't Pam & James marked down for their QS???

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SvMXXj3Te-c

Watch both without sound & then you see the difference & the quality.............

Not to mention Brendan & Lisa's QS

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xrHUQ_oioFY

And then Ian & Denise.....

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nw7dNWp0wVI

Tonight's QS was not a 40 performance.
slappers r us
11-12-2010
Originally Posted by SCDchick:
“I just think its strange that you and a few others have crashed into this thread i posted as i havent noticed you doing that elsewhere. I think my post was well said, but whatever lets just enjoy the dances ”

Dont worry yourself

maybe they are just trying to kill the thread as it has negative comments about their favorite

it was a trick well used on the BB forum
shefair
11-12-2010
Originally Posted by SCDchick:
“ok, enjoy your night ”

whilst I realise that the pamela fans wanted to appreciate her, I foulnd their responses overbearing and irritating ,( somewhat like Pamela herself)

people are allowed to have differening opions without being mocked or lectures or being made to feel they have done anything wrong

However you did get hold of the wrong meaning about the b of a hangover
lach doch mal
11-12-2010
Originally Posted by slappers r us:
“Dont worry yourself

maybe they are just trying to kill the thread as it has negative comments about their favorite

it was a trick well used on the BB forum”

Come off it and read back through it. Sorry if you only expect negative comments on a thread you are on loser street. Anyway, even if I don't like a couple, I don't expect everyone to post negative stuff about them. That would be seriously deluded.

We weren't deranging the thread, but you guys have seriously lost the plot if our talk about cracking open a champagen bottle disturbs you. I suggest a reality check is inorder.
SCDchick
11-12-2010
Originally Posted by slappers r us:
“Dont worry yourself

maybe they are just trying to kill the thread as it has negative comments about their favorite

it was a trick well used on the BB forum”

I can understand that
Satnavvy
11-12-2010
I cannot say how SICK TO BLOODY DEATH I am of reading bitter, sad anti Pamela threads
lach doch mal
11-12-2010
Originally Posted by Satnavvy:
“I cannot say how SICK TO BLOODY DEATH I am of reading bitter, sad anti Pamela threads”

... now, now, now you are derangin this thread. According to the OP you are only allowed to post negative stuff on here. Oh it is negative, but not in the right direction.
Aeryn
11-12-2010
Originally Posted by lach doch mal:
“... now, now, now you are derangin this thread. According to the OP you are only allowed to post negative stuff on here. Oh it is negative, but not in the right direction.”

That comment had me laughing out loud!! hahahaha I really don't understand all the negativity, it just takes so much energy to be so negative. Be happy, it takes less energy I'd say.
slappers r us
11-12-2010
Originally Posted by Satnavvy:
“I cannot say how SICK TO BLOODY DEATH I am of reading bitter, sad anti Pamela threads”

I quite like them
Satnavvy
11-12-2010
Originally Posted by lach doch mal:
“... now, now, now you are derangin this thread. According to the OP you are only allowed to post negative stuff on here. Oh it is negative, but not in the right direction.”

Well spotted
shefair
11-12-2010
Originally Posted by Satnavvy:
“I cannot say how SICK TO BLOODY DEATH I am of reading bitter, sad anti Pamela threads”

well dont do it then
brendan's girl
11-12-2010
Originally Posted by lach doch mal:
“... now, now, now you are derangin this thread. According to the OP you are only allowed to post negative stuff on here. Oh it is negative, but not in the right direction.”

Now now darlling, be nice
lustin
11-12-2010
Completely agree with the fact that Pamela was overmarked tonight, to be honest I think she's been overmarked a few times. I also genuinely believe that Matt and Kara are better dancers, however I think Pamela comes accross as a lovely lady and she has done herself proud so I would never bash her on a personal level at all. The judges on the other hand??? Beyond ridiculous!!!
lach doch mal
11-12-2010
Originally Posted by shefair:
“well dont do it then”

Well to be fair, shefair, sometimes you read a thread about another couple and you still get negativity about Pamela. At this stage of the competition it's inevitable, and can't be avoided. Tonight there are quite a few threads knocking about. Nothing wrong with that, but nothing wrong with being sick of them either.
millie3
11-12-2010
Originally Posted by brendan's girl:
“Darling, if you think this is cliquey I'd advise you not to venure into other threads on this board.

I get that you dont like Pamela but it wont stop us from liking her I'm afraid ”

And you should understand that many people don't
brendan's girl
11-12-2010
Originally Posted by millie3:
“And you should understand that many people don't”

Oh that I do I'm not under any false illusions about her popularity on this board.
<<
<
3 of 8
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map