|
||||||||
Lining up Pamela as judge? |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,176
|
Lining up Pamela as judge?
Pamela is being blatantly overmarked, and given overwhelmingly positive clips packages.
If she wins the series, are they planning to use her to replace Alesha with an older, more experienced, better spoken judge? I can imagine they'd love to use her "extra dimension" as a psychologist, and the other judges obviously already favour her. Personally, I couldn't bear to watch Pamela's smug face every week, and I'd rather have the WYSIWYG of Alesha. |
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: 16th Century England
Posts: 3,173
|
Please no.
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,106
|
Yes you could see them bringing her on to judge the 'sexiness' of each dance
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: DOTS are evil!
Posts: 32,338
|
They'll need to extend each show by about 45 minutes as I don't think Pamela is really a "well done" sort of woman, 15 minutes and she'll still be discussing first dancer.
God she'll be humping Bruno at the desk! ![]() And please Alesha was enough!
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 15,867
|
Viewers would switch off in droves.
I understand Pammie has her fans but she seems to rub people up the wrong way, generally. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: In the biscuit barrel
Posts: 24,669
|
If Dr. Pammie's gurning face appears on the panel next year, it will be the final nail in the coffin for me.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Guest
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 14,697
|
Quote:
If Dr. Pammie's gurning face appears on the panel next year, it will be the final nail in the coffin for me.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 23
|
Why not Pamela, even my budgie wuld be better than Aleysha.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,442
|
She can't be any worse than the dross they have already I suppose they could replace the precocious princess with one of the ugly sisters. Do the BBC feed them drugs or dosh to keep ranting on about sex just like that Arlene. Anybody that wants sexual performance images can find the real thing on the web why would they want a sixty something to fake it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: North-West England
Posts: 25,847
|
Given the number of changes made this year by the new producer, it's just as likely we'd see Billy Connolly as a judge next year.
I used to like him, as a couple of decades ago his act contained a lot of comedy with a bit of profanity. Now it's a lot of profanity with a bit of comedy, so I never bother. |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 10,715
|
Yuck... she'd be as bad as Arlene only she'd also be trying to impress us with her psychological interpretations of all the partnerships
![]() If there's one person who'd be worse than Alesha, it's Pamela. |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 84
|
Dixon is dreadful and Pam would be no better. Ugh please no.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: North-West England
Posts: 25,847
|
I've mentioned before, the judges were deliberately chosen to be as diverse as the characters in "The Village People."
Think along those lines when making suggestions. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 06:49.


