I'm not brilliant at maths so may have misunderstood this, but looking back at the swingathon result couldn't it have had a big bearing on the result?
Pamela came above Scott in the swingathon (which I must say i didnt understand from what i could see Scott and Natalie were much stronger than Pamela and James). Then Matt and Scott tied on the leaderboard both getting the same number of marks over the two semi final nights (was it 70 marks each?). If scott had got an extra mark in the swingathon he'd have got one point more than Matt.
It could have made all the difference couldn't it?? In terms of Matt getting through.
Now I actually think in terms of performance over the series that the final 3 is the right result but i was just wondering how much of an impact the swingathon might have had on the overall result in the semis
Pamela came above Scott in the swingathon (which I must say i didnt understand from what i could see Scott and Natalie were much stronger than Pamela and James). Then Matt and Scott tied on the leaderboard both getting the same number of marks over the two semi final nights (was it 70 marks each?). If scott had got an extra mark in the swingathon he'd have got one point more than Matt.
It could have made all the difference couldn't it?? In terms of Matt getting through.
Now I actually think in terms of performance over the series that the final 3 is the right result but i was just wondering how much of an impact the swingathon might have had on the overall result in the semis
