The point about my wife thinking Kara has already had dance practice is only to point out that the mass of voters probably/possibly have similar views. I had never heard of Kara before this competition, but my wife knew her, probably from watching Eastenders occasionally, and somehow knew about her previous dance experience. If my wife thinks that, how many others do?
As for Len, my understanding was that he was there to maintain the technical integrity of the marking, whereas the others were there as people more general dance experience. Now I am no dance expert, but his marking and justifications this year have been all over the place, and his facial contortions have been ludicrously hammy. His face like thunder when marking Kara down for lifts, then the casual ignoring of other errors that everyone can see. Ditto with Matt. Complaining that he doesn't like faffing around, then not saying a word in the semis. He has become a joke. Which is all well and good if everyone accepts this is an entertainment (which it is), but to act as some sort of strict technical judge, then throw all that out of the window to keep his position with the BBC (and get a radio programme) - now That's What I Call Whoring.
And that is why I love Aliona - she doesn't give a toss what he thinks, and makes that clear. Good for you, girl. I hope she goes for the jugular in the final (and takes poor innocent Matt with her!).
BTW one thing I really like about the Matt and Aliona partnership is that in the past the celebrity favourite has played the part of the happy innocent, dutifully following their pro to perform absolutely conventional dances. This time the favourite has used their position to take the(ir) audience on a rollercoaster of broken SCD conventions, and the audience has gone with them. It has raised big questions about what the judges are really there for and I love that. If nothing changed SCD would go the way of the old Come Dancing - the audience would desert the programme from boredom because it was no longer relevant.
As for Len, my understanding was that he was there to maintain the technical integrity of the marking, whereas the others were there as people more general dance experience. Now I am no dance expert, but his marking and justifications this year have been all over the place, and his facial contortions have been ludicrously hammy. His face like thunder when marking Kara down for lifts, then the casual ignoring of other errors that everyone can see. Ditto with Matt. Complaining that he doesn't like faffing around, then not saying a word in the semis. He has become a joke. Which is all well and good if everyone accepts this is an entertainment (which it is), but to act as some sort of strict technical judge, then throw all that out of the window to keep his position with the BBC (and get a radio programme) - now That's What I Call Whoring.
And that is why I love Aliona - she doesn't give a toss what he thinks, and makes that clear. Good for you, girl. I hope she goes for the jugular in the final (and takes poor innocent Matt with her!).
BTW one thing I really like about the Matt and Aliona partnership is that in the past the celebrity favourite has played the part of the happy innocent, dutifully following their pro to perform absolutely conventional dances. This time the favourite has used their position to take the(ir) audience on a rollercoaster of broken SCD conventions, and the audience has gone with them. It has raised big questions about what the judges are really there for and I love that. If nothing changed SCD would go the way of the old Come Dancing - the audience would desert the programme from boredom because it was no longer relevant.





