Originally Posted by eggshell:
“A lot of us thought that the decision last week was made in the full knowledge that Stuart was embellishing and that his firing would be more interesting this week...as indeed it was.
Think Sugar is being a bit disengenuous here...they've built up Stuart and his fibs up to be a big thing over three episodes just to get greater effect from tonights sacking and Liz was one of the unfortunate side effects of this plan.”
Its either that or he looked at the edit of what he had done and realised that he looked a complete sap. Not spotting the blindingly obvious is one thing - but he has particular problems with people who take him in and even more problems with those who second guess him and spin him a Sugaresque line. You would imagine at some point someone took him aside and explained to him unless he realised itself himself minutes later.. ......
Either way it looked like he just needed a small excuse this week to fire Baggs. The firing didn't fit with the interviewers discussion, which was bizarely favourable, or the indivdual interviews shown, or the sin shown - which was less than Lee had committed with his CV. It looked set up to do what needed doing from weeks before.
Not sure of the impact Sugar being Baggsed made on Liz's final chances. She's smarter than Stella and better at presentation, sales and basic business sense, but Stella has a Yasmina change story plus a selfmade woman one like Michelle's. Chris seems to be there for no good reason at all apart from being the sort of chap Nick likes. It may be down to the job - and, if that needs someone who would look OK in Nick's club, it will be Chris.
Not having Liz there, makes it easier for LS to pick either Chris or Stella as LS deems fit. He would find it difficult to argue that Stella was better than Liz at much, or to argue that Chris could do better than Liz in a Simon type job requiring better educational , personal or presentational skills. He can now argue Stella is too corporate and cold
or Chris is too inexperienced and unconvincing , or that either of them are very dull presenters, and take whoever he wants.