From what we saw, Joanna's interviews were, quite frankly, terrible. Yet when it came to the interviewers giving feedback to LS they were all pretty positive about her, even Claude. I think their remarks on her were more positive than they were for any of the men, including Chris who got a rather positive edit over all.

Did anyone else notice this? Is it likely that the edit was misleading. Or is it more that they liked Joanna as a person/ for what she achieved more than 'droning' Chris but he technically gave a better interview and she really was as clueless as was shown. But then I think if she was really that bad (other than in Borden's interview which is the only interview we saw all that much of, and one that we can say she definitely struggled with) then surely the likes of Margaret would have dismissed her in the same way they did Jamie?

Don't forget that the producers like to concentrate as far as possible on things that catch the candidates out or embarrass them.

They completely failed with Stella and to be quite honest, they were scraping the bottom of the barrel to come up with even what they did on Joanna.

I get the feeling they were impressed with what she'd done, both on the tasks and in her life, and felt she would be better off expanding on that than working for someone else.

According to today's Metro, Sugar has said he will keep in touch with her so I would hope she will get some good quality mentoring to guide her in building her own business.

If this is true...and AS DOES keep to his word and take her on board as a mentor...he would have shown himself in a positive light as far as I'm concerned!!

Rabbit in Headlights