|
||||||||
Do 'Past Performances' Count In The Final? |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 9,757
|
Do 'Past Performances' Count In The Final?
Is the series winner decided by who wins the final task, ie like who makes the most money for selling something - or does the final task tend to be one where no actual definitive result is possible and it's down to Sugar's interpretation who did the best?
If it's the latter, does he also bring past performances into play or is purely who he thinks did best in the final? Cheers |
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 10,820
|
Quote:
Is the series winner decided by who wins the final task, ie like who makes the most money for selling something - or does the final task tend to be one where no actual definitive result is possible and it's down to Sugar's interpretation who did the best?
If it's the latter, does he also bring past performances into play or is purely who he thinks did best in the final? Cheers |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Nottingham
Posts: 11,478
|
On the face of it the final alone decides who wins.
In reality the final is always structured such that a winner isn't decided by any measurable means - ie no sales quantities, no items to collect. Every final has been a presentation with industry worthies feeding back to Lordalun, who then puts his spin on it and picks the winner based on that. Except he doesnt as historically two endings to the final boardroom are shot each with one candidate as the "winner" and then the two candidates work for Lord Sid for a few months. Lordalun decides close to transmission date which of the two is his winner and the relevant boardroom scene is shown. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 921
|
Quote:
On the face of it the final alone decides who wins.
In reality the final is always structured such that a winner isn't decided by any measurable means - ie no sales quantities, no items to collect. Every final has been a presentation with industry worthies feeding back to Lordalun, who then puts his spin on it and picks the winner based on that. Except he doesnt as historically two endings to the final boardroom are shot each with one candidate as the "winner" and then the two candidates work for Lord Sid for a few months. Lordalun decides close to transmission date which of the two is his winner and the relevant boardroom scene is shown. )
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 28,896
|
Past performances seem to count for nothing.
Joanna had the best record on tasks (as did Lucinda a couple of years ago), but both were eliminated at the interview stage. Chris's record is weak, but he's landed himself a place in the final. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Nottingham, UK
Posts: 11,878
|
Quote:
Is the series winner decided by who wins the final task, ie like who makes the most money for selling something - or does the final task tend to be one where no actual definitive result is possible and it's down to Sugar's interpretation who did the best?
Quote:
If it's the latter, does he also bring past performances into play or is purely who he thinks did best in the final?
He can include everything. The decision isn't made until a few days before broadcast. I suspect he takes into account public reaction to the episodes already broadcast, and the legal issues about some candidates that only came to light after principle filming. Everything.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 9,757
|
Quote:
Chris's record is weak, but he's landed himself a place in the final.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 28,896
|
Quote:
You would have to say Stella is clearly ahead on points and should she also outshine Chris in the final task but not get the job for 'other reasons', the programme would surely lose much credibilty?
She has proved herself to be a far stronger candidate to Chris (whom I like also). The final should just be a formality. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Titan Uranus
Posts: 31,966
|
Lord Sugar does seem to take past performances into account, or maybe he chooses his winner and picks out the relevant facts needed to defend his decision.
![]() On the You're Hired show following the final, after Lee won he pointed to the fact that he had never been in the bottom three in the boardroom, and he did have the second best win/loss record of the series (just 1 more loss than Lucinda) Plus, after Yasmina won, he acknowledged that she won all 3 times as project manager and that when leading the team in week 2 she immediately concentrated on the very thing that caused the girls to lose the previous week - the costs. Let's just casually leave out the Sandalwood/Cedarwood fiasco, afterall I think that was more of a mix-up in ingredients rather than just going about it in the wrong way like in the cleaning task.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: London - Gerbilophobe!
Posts: 9,091
|
You've got to remember - they have both been working for Siralun for a year already by now - because of the scheduling delay of this series on account of the election.
Who he picks very much depends on how he finds them over that time. Even then, its not just sales. Apparently Kate sold 4 times as many Amscreens as Yasmina last year - but he still picked Yasmina. I understand that this year the prize is not just a 100k job for a year - but something more management oriented with a larger budget. JJ |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 3,089
|
Quote:
You would have to say Stella is clearly ahead on points and should she also outshine Chris in the final task but not get the job for 'other reasons', the programme would surely lose much credibilty?
And so Sugar can choose to emphasise any points he wants to in order to pick his candidate. So, for example, if one team comes up with the best flavour and the best advert and he wants the other candidate he'll concentrate on the presentation and the design of the label. |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 34,226
|
Quote:
You would have to say Stella is clearly ahead on points and should she also outshine Chris in the final task but not get the job for 'other reasons', the programme would surely lose much credibilty?
The definition of apprentice is never spelt out - arguably Joanna would be the best fit this series as someone young, inexperienced and who has shown real raw potential. The job determines who is best placed to fill it - both in who could and who wouldn't fit it. chris and Stella are very different they might not both fit the job. The period spent working for LS could be decisive and remove any quesions left on the show. History looks different when evaluated with time. He hasn't got his best candidates to the final.There's very often a silly firing and his choices are driven by things unrelated to the show like life stories, TV needs and people blagging (Bagging?) him. How he counts the last task is often random. How you count points so far depends on what LS believes he has seen from whats happened so far. If you follow the story put together by the editors so far, Chris has the major plus of his tour week negotiation on his side and is better at sales. Stella is usually steady, but has no really big highs and the truffles disaster keeps on turning up on the summary shows as a big, informative, error. I agree Chris hasn't got much in his record, but thats because I don't think he had whats been spun as the one brilliant moment in the series. You count what you see. |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 12,694
|
Quote:
Let's just casually leave out the Sandalwood/Cedarwood fiasco, afterall I think that was more of a mix-up in ingredients rather than just going about it in the wrong way like in the cleaning task.
![]() I did heart her. |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 25,385
|
Quote:
You would have to say Stella is clearly ahead on points and should she also outshine Chris in the final task but not get the job for 'other reasons', the programme would surely lose much credibilty?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Titan Uranus
Posts: 31,966
|
Quote:
It lost it in 2007 with the Simon/Kristina final if that's the case.
![]() I supported Simon back then, but this time I hope things are the other way round. |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 2,275
|
Quote:
Neither really - Sugar will just employ the one he wants regardless of anything else.
Or, at the very least, put a spin on it so it suits whatever he's decided.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 9,757
|
Quote:
But its inherently got a credibility problem anyway.
The definition of apprentice is never spelt out - arguably Joanna would be the best fit this series as someone young, inexperienced and who has shown real raw potential. The job determines who is best placed to fill it - both in who could and who wouldn't fit it. chris and Stella are very different they might not both fit the job. The period spent working for LS could be decisive and remove any quesions left on the show. History looks different when evaluated with time. He hasn't got his best candidates to the final.There's very often a silly firing and his choices are driven by things unrelated to the show like life stories, TV needs and people blagging (Bagging?) him. How he counts the last task is often random. How you count points so far depends on what LS believes he has seen from whats happened so far. If you follow the story put together by the editors so far, Chris has the major plus of his tour week negotiation on his side and is better at sales. Stella is usually steady, but has no really big highs and the truffles disaster keeps on turning up on the summary shows as a big, informative, error. I agree Chris hasn't got much in his record, but thats because I don't think he had whats been spun as the one brilliant moment in the series. You count what you see. I think the term 'apprentice' could be applied to anyone aspiring to do something at a higher level to which they had previously experienced, so think it is a fair title for the show, despite the bullshit some of the contestants come out with about how much money they make and how successful they already are I have to disagree with you re Chris and the tourism negotiation - I really believe he didn't know what he was letting himself in for there and that it was a mistake on his part that he agreed to such a deal - luckily it worked out well for him though - but absolutely no way was it an act of genius
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 3,089
|
Quote:
The job determines who is best placed to fill it - both in who could and who wouldn't fit it. chris and Stella are very different they might not both fit the job.
The period spent working for LS could be decisive and remove any quesions left on the show. It seems odd that someone like Sugar would effectively keep a job open for six months or more. It would be saying that for six series he knew of a £100k* job that needed doing and left it empty or that he knew of a £100k job that was going to open in some months time. * We know that the £100k is paid by the production company so the job may not actually be one that really pays that. |
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Earth dumbarse
Posts: 4,394
|
Quote:
Past performances seem to count for nothing.
Joanna had the best record on tasks (as did Lucinda a couple of years ago), but both were eliminated at the interview stage. Chris's record is weak, but he's landed himself a place in the final. |
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 34,226
|
Quote:
Joanna would have been the real fairytale rags to riches story had she won, but feel her challenged petered out towards the end.
I think the term 'apprentice' could be applied to anyone aspiring to do something at a higher level to which they had previously experienced, so think it is a fair title for the show, despite the bullshit some of the contestants come out with about how much money they make and how successful they already are I have to disagree with you re Chris and the tourism negotiation - I really believe he didn't know what he was letting himself in for there and that it was a mistake on his part that he agreed to such a deal - luckily it worked out well for him though - but absolutely no way was it an act of genius ![]() I am with you on Chris - I tend to discount the shrewd decision too - we will see if it turns up tonight in the argument. |
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 921
|
Quote:
It's also worth noting that, particularly for this series, the job may have changed between the time they filmed and the time he made his final decision.
It seems odd that someone like Sugar would effectively keep a job open for six months or more. It would be saying that for six series he knew of a £100k* job that needed doing and left it empty or that he knew of a £100k job that was going to open in some months time. * We know that the £100k is paid by the production company so the job may not actually be one that really pays that. |
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Titan Uranus
Posts: 31,966
|
Talking about past performances, I'm surprised Liz was considered the favourite when her win/loss record was pretty much on a par with Chris's.
Right up to the last task before the interviews (where she was fired), they had both won 4 tasks (1 as project manager) and lost 6 tasks (again 1 as project manager), plus they had both been in the bottom 3 in the boardroom 3 times. Yet Chris was constantly criticized for losing so much. Stuart's record was slightly better with 5 wins (1 as PM) and 5 losses (1 as PM), and again was in the bottom 3 in the boardroom 3 times. So if Lord Sugar wanted to blag his way to explaining keeping Stuart over Liz he could say that Stuart's past performance was slightly better.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 40,289
|
Both Stella and Chris have been working for Lord Sugar for the last 6 months day in day out.
I expect his final decision on who to employ as his apprentice had far more to do with what they did in those six months than what they did on the final task - LS isn't in the alcoholic drink business!
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 00:32.


)
