Originally Posted by ianswaiting:
“I am not saying that having a favourite means you can't be impartial, but for a lot of people it will make it harder for you to be more objective and it is quite natural when you have a personal favourite to assume, when the judges don't agree with you, that they are biased against your favourite. That's not being simplistic, it's human nature.
The judges are marking based on dance performance, technical content etc whereas the public will include things like whether or not they like the celebrity, whether or not they are in their favourite soap, whether or not they would shag them given half a chance.
As a trained dancer, albeit some years ago, I tend to base my choice of who to vote for on how they dance and that alone(which can change from week to week) and in a lot of cases I end up agreeing with the order that the judges have, especially Craig so on that basis I don't consider them to be biased at all.”
*Applauds loudly*
Oh, and applause for all your other posts in this thread! Spot on.
I've lost count of the number of times FMs have criticised Craig for being biased against their favourite. He was extremely critical of Kara last night about what he perceived as flaws in her dancing, but the aftershow comments on the Strictly website prove that he was ecstatic that she won. Had he been biased, wouldn't he have shaken the dust off that 10 paddle a while back?
I have read other posts from dancers (who understand these things where I do not) saying that Matt was too light on his feet to do the samba or paso justice - something technical about digging into the floor or something. I thought both dances were great, so what do I know? But that's the difference - I'm seeing them from an entertainment point of view, not necessarily a technical one. You'd think after eight series, I could tell the difference between a salsa and a samba, but I still get them confused.
Matt was criticised for the show dance not just because there were too many tricks and lifts (Kara got the same criticism for that aspect) but because of the transitions between them. Again, this is technobabble to me, but it's perfectly acceptable in my view for the judges to judge on those grounds - that's their job.
I've been happier with the judges this year than virtually any previous year, with the exception of some of Len's more whacky sayings. Yes, some of the marking was bizarre, but the all-important positions on the leader-board were broadly correct, the best three couples got into the final and the best couple won. Bias? You might as well accuse the Great British Public of being biased!