DS Forums

 
 

Change to the winner's prize next year.


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 20-12-2010, 17:18
ea91
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 2,275
Apart from the 14 odd tasks to do before hand, and apart from having to compete with a handful of other candidates, and apart from having 1 "dragon" to pitch to, and apart from having to do 4 interviews yeah your right it is pretty much like Dragons Den.
Well if you're looking for someone to invest in you, you're much better off going on Dragons' Den where there's 4 people to invest in you instead of 1, you don't have to do endure the whole 14 weeks and you don't have to give up your job.

I'm not saying it's exactly like Dragons' Den, but with the prize becoming strikingly like the one on Dragons' Den the whole process loses a lot of credibility in comparison and the title "The Apprentice" becomes somewhat redundant, don't you think? It's gonna be more like "The Business Partner" now.
ea91 is offline   Reply With Quote
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
Old 20-12-2010, 18:01
-JT-
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 107
Can't beleive people are saying this is a poor prize. It's an unbelievable opportunity for the winner.

The prize isn't a 250k investment in someones current business it's 250k to start up a new business. 250k plus sugars contact book and probably the use of his infrastructure is a huge opportunity.

I started my business with 5k, no contacts and a bedroom office!
-JT- is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22-12-2010, 19:54
brangdon
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Nottingham, UK
Posts: 11,878
On what planet is getting given 250k to start up a business. and maintaining a 50 percent share a bad deal.
If you kept 51% then I might agree, but giving away half means you effectively don't have control any more.
brangdon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-12-2010, 11:22
ACU
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 7,916
Well if you're looking for someone to invest in you, you're much better off going on Dragons' Den where there's 4 people to invest in you instead of 1, you don't have to do endure the whole 14 weeks and you don't have to give up your job.
Not if yo got a fledgling or a startup business. The chances of the dragons investing £250k in any business is very low, and if its a fledgling business then its virtually nil. I am not sure how many times the dragons have invested £250K in a business, but I would bet its very very low.

I'm not saying it's exactly like Dragons' Den, but with the prize becoming strikingly like the one on Dragons' Den the whole process loses a lot of credibility in comparison and the title "The Apprentice" becomes somewhat redundant, don't you think? It's gonna be more like "The Business Partner" now.[/quote]

Its nothing like Dragons den, the only similarity is the prize. The prize is not discussed on the show (the apprentice). All you hear its a job with a 100K salary - thats it. I do agree the title is all wrong. Maybe the prize should be, you work with Sugar for a year, learn something from him, and then you get the £250K to start/continue your business.
ACU is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-12-2010, 11:23
ACU
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 7,916
If you kept 51% then I might agree, but giving away half means you effectively don't have control any more.
not necessarily, you can be 50/50 partners, and one partner can have the final say when it comes to business decisions.
ACU is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-12-2010, 12:37
slapmatt
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: London
Posts: 2,323
I still don't see how they can offer someone £250k to start a business unless you've got a business plan or at least a rough idea of what you want to do?
slapmatt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-12-2010, 13:11
Mr Poetic
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,859
Thats what I dont understand@ slapmatt
Mr Poetic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-12-2010, 14:04
Jepson
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 3,089
I still don't see how they can offer someone £250k to start a business unless you've got a business plan or at least a rough idea of what you want to do?
Thats what I dont understand@ slapmatt
There is bound to be an enormous quantity of small print that will restrict what business can be started and I would imagine Sugar has a veto.

Maybe the candidates were asked to submit a business proposal as part of the selection process - or at least for the very final rounds.
Jepson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-12-2010, 14:16
ACU
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 7,916
There is bound to be an enormous quantity of small print that will restrict what business can be started and I would imagine Sugar has a veto.

Maybe the candidates were asked to submit a business proposal as part of the selection process - or at least for the very final rounds.
I agree, there is bound to be a hefty contracts the candidates will have to sign, before they are selected to participate.

Sugar is no idiot, he will have covered his back - the money will only go to someone who Sugar thinks will make him some money.
ACU is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-12-2010, 14:28
slapmatt
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: London
Posts: 2,323
Given that so many Dragon's Den deals fall through - and these are with established businesses - I can't see how this will work.

The most obvious business to set up is a consultancy, which is what so many failed Apprentice contestants do, but given Alan Sugar's famously vocal hatred of them I can't see that happening either.
slapmatt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-12-2010, 16:23
thenetworkbabe
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 34,226
R.I.P Apprentice as an entertainment show

It makes no sesne this prize. Its either too generous or not generous enough. £250000. Couuld you imagine Joanna being given 250k for a 50% stake in her business. Its probabaly worth 50k if that. Or Stuart getting the same for his Blue Wave, which he said has turned over 3 mill. He would laugh in Alan's face

This prize would mean that you would have to get 12 or so serious people all with viable businesses that need investment and that are worth investing 250k, unless of course it is UP TO 250k in investment

Should make a good business program but unmissable viewing, maybe not

However, lets wait and see
and the competition would be between the 12 business proposals with the tasks irrelevant............

Or you would have someone like Michelle - with their own business up and running - competing against someone unemployed, someone working in something else like banking or medicine, someone already working in sales or marketing and someone just out of education. Michelle wins on day one as she's proven what they need to prove already.......
thenetworkbabe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-12-2010, 17:07
Tassium
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: It's Grim
Posts: 24,403
Haven't watched this programme for years but this change does change the point of the show completely.

So Lord Sugar will now be looking for a business partner instead of an apprentice? hmmm...
Tassium is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-12-2010, 17:32
phunk
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 149
The reason for the change is that Alan Sugar doesn't really have much left in terms of businesses that he controls that it would actually make sense having an Apprentice winner working in. Winning the Apprentice and then being given a job at Viglen or Amsprop isn't exactly an exciting prospect, and Sugar will probably gradually be selling those off over the next few years to fund his retirement.

If I won I would set up a very small business which paid me a salary of £249,999 on the first day, and then I would wind it up.
phunk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-12-2010, 18:38
jgj
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: The-Village-Hall
Posts: 3,839
The reason for the change is that Alan Sugar doesn't really have much left in terms of businesses that he controls that it would actually make sense having an Apprentice winner working in. Winning the Apprentice and then being given a job at Viglen or Amsprop isn't exactly an exciting prospect, and Sugar will probably gradually be selling those off over the next few years to fund his retirement.

If I won I would set up a very small business which paid me a salary of £249,999 on the first day, and then I would wind it up.
Somehow, I doubt that. Simon Sugar is CEO of AMScreen; Daniel Sugar is a director at AMSProp - which leads me to believe he'll want to pass on some of his businesses to his children (he also has a daughter).

As for the last paragraph, I've no doubt LS will have put safeguards in place against crooks like you.
jgj is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-12-2010, 19:08
phunk
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 149
As for the last paragraph, I've no doubt LS will have put safeguards in place against crooks like you.
What kind of safeguards? As a director I can choose to do whatever I like with the money in the company.
phunk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-12-2010, 19:17
Jepson
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 3,089
What kind of safeguards? As a director I can choose to do whatever I like with the money in the company.
Not if you have agreed to do or not to do certain things as a condition of getting finance.
Jepson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-12-2010, 19:23
robtuk06
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 4,425
What kind of safeguards? As a director I can choose to do whatever I like with the money in the company.
Do you honestly believe that finance is given unconditionally?
robtuk06 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-12-2010, 19:28
jgj
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: The-Village-Hall
Posts: 3,839
What kind of safeguards? As a director I can choose to do whatever I like with the money in the company.
Ummm... no, you can't. Directors are ultimately answerable to the shareholders, who own the company. Apart from that, a company, under English law, is a person. A director who draws money from a company without permission from its owners is stealing - which I believe is a criminal offence - even if the director is also a shareholder. A director who, through his actions - like drawing an overly large salary - causes the company to become insolvent is deemed to have defrauded the company - and that's also a criminal offence.

You don't know much about company law, do you?
jgj is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-12-2010, 20:15
Jepson
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 3,089
A director who, through his actions - like drawing an overly large salary - causes the company to become insolvent is deemed to have defrauded the company - and that's also a criminal offence.
I don't think that's true in general. It's often the case that companies that have become insolvent have been paying their directors large salaries up until the very last minute.


However, even if a director (or group of directors) has 75% of the shares there are certain things that he/they cannot do - things that would be legally termed 'a fraud on the minority'.
Jepson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-12-2010, 20:27
jgj
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: The-Village-Hall
Posts: 3,839
I don't think that's true in general. It's often the case that companies that have become insolvent have been paying their directors large salaries up until the very last minute.


However, even if a director (or group of directors) has 75% of the shares there are certain things that he/they cannot do - things that would be legally termed 'a fraud on the minority'.
Yes. It's up to the insolvency practitioner to notify the authorities if he or she suspects fraud. Many times, in cases of voluntary insolvency, the directors appoint a "friendly and flexible" insolvency practitioner. However, I doubt that paying oneself the whole of the company's cash reserve (which is actually the amount invested by the other shareholder), in one lump sum, would pass muster even with one of them - or that many directors did such things.
jgj is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-12-2010, 20:30
Jepson
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 3,089
Yes. It's up to the insolvency practitioner to notify the authorities if he or she suspects fraud. Many times, in cases of voluntary insolvency, the directors appoint a "friendly and flexible" insolvency practitioner. However, I doubt that paying oneself the whole of the company's cash reserve (which is actually the amount invested by the other shareholder), in one lump sum, would pass muster even with one of them - or that many directors did such things.
No, that would definitely ring every alarm bell.
Jepson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-12-2010, 21:19
ThinWhitePuke
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 202
I would never enter a program like this.

These candidates will presumably be submitting business plans as part of the process of the series, I very much doubt that Sugar is the type of person that would sign an NDA. No big businessman I have ever come across does NDA's hence why I would never deal with them.

With his wealth he could easily see some businesses he likes from the business plans and start them himself without the candidate.

With my business anyone who is going to be privy to information has to sign a watertight NDA.
ThinWhitePuke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24-12-2010, 10:14
ACU
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 7,916
I would never enter a program like this.

These candidates will presumably be submitting business plans as part of the process of the series, I very much doubt that Sugar is the type of person that would sign an NDA. No big businessman I have ever come across does NDA's hence why I would never deal with them.

With his wealth he could easily see some businesses he likes from the business plans and start them himself without the candidate.

With my business anyone who is going to be privy to information has to sign a watertight NDA.
I doubt very much he would steal an ideal from a candidate. He would have far much to lose.
ACU is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24-12-2010, 10:25
ThinWhitePuke
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 202
I doubt very much he would steal an ideal from a candidate. He would have far much to lose.
Without a patent or an NDA little he could do

"The Brand" talked openly in a show about a tracking device for dogs, now unless Baggs has a patent on that idea the fact it is now in the public domain what is legally stopping Sugar from hiring a designer to develop one and maybe make a few million from it ? nothing
ThinWhitePuke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24-12-2010, 11:00
Jepson
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 3,089
"The Brand" talked openly in a show about a tracking device for dogs, now unless Baggs has a patent on that idea the fact it is now in the public domain what is legally stopping Sugar from hiring a designer to develop one and maybe make a few million from it ? nothing
The fact that the idea was dementedly stupid.

The bagginator may have fooled people here into thinking he's technically savvy (and he may well be in one very specialised area) but anyone with the vaguest understanding of RF communication knows that there is no way in the world you can get enough power to the chip in a micro-chipped dog to track it. (At least with today's technology.)
Jepson is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply




 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 01:55.