Originally Posted by Jepson:
“Not if you have agreed to do or not to do certain things as a condition of getting finance.”
“Not if you have agreed to do or not to do certain things as a condition of getting finance.”
Originally Posted by robtuk06:
“Do you honestly believe that finance is given unconditionally?”
“Do you honestly believe that finance is given unconditionally?”
If it's not, then I can't see how the programme works. Once I've won, I've won. Sugar then gives me 250k to set up a business. I, presumably, can set up whatever sort of business I like. Sugar has already decided that I have won, so he's not really in a position to put further conditions on giving me the prize.
Originally Posted by jgj:
“Ummm... no, you can't. Directors are ultimately answerable to the shareholders, who own the company. Apart from that, a company, under English law, is a person. A director who draws money from a company without permission from its owners is stealing - which I believe is a criminal offence - even if the director is also a shareholder. A director who, through his actions - like drawing an overly large salary - causes the company to become insolvent is deemed to have defrauded the company - and that's also a criminal offence.
You don't know much about company law, do you?”
“Ummm... no, you can't. Directors are ultimately answerable to the shareholders, who own the company. Apart from that, a company, under English law, is a person. A director who draws money from a company without permission from its owners is stealing - which I believe is a criminal offence - even if the director is also a shareholder. A director who, through his actions - like drawing an overly large salary - causes the company to become insolvent is deemed to have defrauded the company - and that's also a criminal offence.
You don't know much about company law, do you?”
Enough to know that it is sporadically enforced - for example, nobody from RBS has gone to jail.



