• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • TV Shows: Reality
  • The Apprentice
The Tory Boy lost! - hopefully the start of a new trend!
<<
<
2 of 2
>>
>
ea91
20-12-2010
Originally Posted by sorcha_healy27:
“How about New Labour policies? didn't see the tories leading the UK into an illegal war”

Oh they would have had they been in power!

But this isn't a politics forum. And I don't support the Tories or Labour.
AndyJK
20-12-2010
Originally Posted by ea91:
“Again, I was talking about Tories now, in light of David Cameron's policies. Milk Snatcher was before my time, so I can't say I have any strong views towards her.”

Right, because the Tories are going to **** up the country as if it wasn't already.
ea91
20-12-2010
Originally Posted by AndyJK:
“Right, because the Tories are going to **** up the country as if it wasn't already.”

No praise for Labour here either.
sorcha_healy27
20-12-2010
Originally Posted by ea91:
“Oh they would have had they been in power!

But this isn't a politics forum. And I don't support the Tories or Labour.”

You're the one who started a thread dissing chris because he appeared to you to be a tory voter

don't now try and pull the "it's not a politics" thread
Syntax Error
20-12-2010
When I saw the title of this thread, I thought Nick Clegg had lost in a vote or by-election or something!!
ea91
20-12-2010
Originally Posted by sorcha_healy27:
“You're the one who started a thread dissing chris because he appeared to you to be a tory voter

don't now try and pull the "it's not a politics" thread”

Lol, I didn't start this stupid thread.
sorcha_healy27
20-12-2010
Originally Posted by ea91:
“Lol, I didn't start this stupid thread.”

Whoops my apologies
goldenhair
20-12-2010
Originally Posted by adam ant:
“Go Stella!”


...This is an extremely weak thread. I hope you apply more logic to your arguments than this....you sound like Prescott!.
AndyJK
20-12-2010
Originally Posted by goldenhair:
“...This is an extremely weak thread. I hope you apply more logic to your arguments than this....you sound like Prescott!.”

Sadly people still want to fight a class war. Reverse snobbery and I saw that when I was growing up on a council estate. People sneering at those because they talk posh or live in a nice house. I envied the rich but I never looked down on them. It just made me want to work harder to have that lifestyle.

As for Prescott the self-proclaimed warrior of the working classes, there has never been a bigger hypocrite. The guy who has a mansion in Humberside and other properties. As with all lefties once they get money they become champagne socialists. Makes me sick.
jgj
20-12-2010
Originally Posted by ea91:
“Lol, I didn't start this stupid thread.”

No, you went and slanted it even more towards politics - and when people raised good arguments against your position and thoroughly bashed it you backpedalled for all your life was worth. You did not raise one argument to sustain (or support) your position.

Just comes to prove how indefensible it was to start with.
jgj
20-12-2010
Originally Posted by AndyJK:
“Sadly people still want to fight a class war. Reverse snobbery and I saw that when I was growing up on a council estate. People sneering at those because they talk posh or live in a nice house. I envied the rich but I never looked down on them. It just made me want to work harder to have that lifestyle.

As for Prescott the self-proclaimed warrior of the working classes, there has never been a bigger hypocrite. The guy who has a mansion in Humberside and other properties. As with all lefties once they get money they become champagne socialists. Makes me sick.”

And one has to ask - how exactly did Prescott acquire these properties? Through good, honest-to-God work at the coal face? In the factory? No, I know... tilling the land!!

No?

How then, exactly?
stash22
20-12-2010
Originally Posted by sorcha_healy27:
“How about New Labour policies? didn't see the tories leading the UK into an illegal war”

A tory gvmt would have gone to war too, they supported it at the time - only Lib dems wouldn't have. I dont see any huge difference in the morals of New Labour and the Tories in that area of policies.
nanscombe
21-12-2010
As Lord Sugar is, I believe a Labour peer, I'm surprised that he didn't just say.

"Sod the money. You're ALL hired."

That way he wouldn't have had to fire anyone. His organisation may have become bloated and run up huge debts but ...

Oh hang on, or am I thinking of the Public Service under New Labour?
Crazyeyeskiller
21-12-2010
Originally Posted by ea91:
“I'm gonna go out on a limb and say that at least 99% of people who grew up on council estates aren't.”

yeh i wouldn't risk any limbs on that claim mate
Frillynix
21-12-2010
Originally Posted by ea91:
“I'm gonna go out on a limb and say that at least 99% of people who grew up on council estates aren't.”

Wrong. I did, and I do.
Frillynix
21-12-2010
deleted - cant be arsed - opening post is akin to the Krankies.
AndyJK
21-12-2010
Originally Posted by stash22:
“A tory gvmt would have gone to war too, they supported it at the time - only Lib dems wouldn't have. I dont see any huge difference in the morals of New Labour and the Tories in that area of policies.”

To be fair the Tories supported the decision to go to war based on the so-called intelligence detailed by the Labour government that Iraq had the capability to launch a WMD against the UK within 8 hours.

The difference with the Lib Dems is that opposed to go to war to appeal to anti-war voters.
<<
<
2 of 2
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map