I know this has been asked before but after watching the final I still can't understand why any of the candidates (especially the finalists) want the final job.
Why would either Chris or Stella want to swap a career at Nomura or JP Morgan to work in Brentford (no offense) as a manager for a second tier IT firm (Viglen)?
I often think that the person who comes second or third is the real winner as they could at least get on tv etc if they want to without having to slog it out at a potentially boring job for a year.
100k/year is not a fortune (especially compared to Stella and Chris's former employers where a bonus alone could be many times this figure never mind the salary), and they seem to be making the mistake of short term gain for long term pain.
Obviously having access to Alan Suger (who I have a lot of respect for) makes the Viglen job more desireable than it would be otherwise but the losing candidates seem to be able to contact him for advice also and its not like the apprentice would be sitting in Sugar's office 24/7.
It interests me because I work in management consulting (which some of the past contestants claim to), and although I earn a bit less than 100k at the moment there is no way in a million years I would leave a firm like mine to take a slightly higher salary at an IT company. No way.
This could mean that the contestants titles on the show are just grossly exageratted though. I'm not sure. A 'successful investment banker' (as Liz, Chris and Stella have been described) wouldn't make the move to be a manager at an IT firm IMO but someone earning 30k with no bonus in some role at an investment bank may jump at the chance to triple their salary (although they may end up worse in the long run).
Neither Chris nor Stella (or most of the others) strike me as the type of people that if the show didn't exist would be desperate to be product managers in an IT firm.
Thoughts?
Why would either Chris or Stella want to swap a career at Nomura or JP Morgan to work in Brentford (no offense) as a manager for a second tier IT firm (Viglen)?
I often think that the person who comes second or third is the real winner as they could at least get on tv etc if they want to without having to slog it out at a potentially boring job for a year.
100k/year is not a fortune (especially compared to Stella and Chris's former employers where a bonus alone could be many times this figure never mind the salary), and they seem to be making the mistake of short term gain for long term pain.
Obviously having access to Alan Suger (who I have a lot of respect for) makes the Viglen job more desireable than it would be otherwise but the losing candidates seem to be able to contact him for advice also and its not like the apprentice would be sitting in Sugar's office 24/7.
It interests me because I work in management consulting (which some of the past contestants claim to), and although I earn a bit less than 100k at the moment there is no way in a million years I would leave a firm like mine to take a slightly higher salary at an IT company. No way.
This could mean that the contestants titles on the show are just grossly exageratted though. I'm not sure. A 'successful investment banker' (as Liz, Chris and Stella have been described) wouldn't make the move to be a manager at an IT firm IMO but someone earning 30k with no bonus in some role at an investment bank may jump at the chance to triple their salary (although they may end up worse in the long run).
Neither Chris nor Stella (or most of the others) strike me as the type of people that if the show didn't exist would be desperate to be product managers in an IT firm.
Thoughts?