DS Forums

 
 

Video recorders


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 17-01-2011, 12:45
linkinpark875
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 24,424

I had a look on ebay seems they are worth £30 for a cheap branded one and upto about £80 for the good Sony video recorders. How come they are worth so much? I take it there's a bit of a retro market for them now? Is it worth holding on to them for a few more years will they increase more in value?
linkinpark875 is offline   Reply With Quote
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
Old 17-01-2011, 12:50
Pugwash69
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: The Sticks
Posts: 3,720
Small markets cost more to produce. I don't suppose there's much call for a recording device that's so low image quality and uses perishable media. I probably paid about £300 for a Sharp nicam model with 4 heads and stereo output 20 years ago.
Pugwash69 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17-01-2011, 13:28
bobcar
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 14,718
They're becoming harder to get hold of and people still want them so the price is bound to hold a bit.

I can think of two reasons why people still want them: The first is they have loads of programmes recorded an the second is that many people (especially the elderly) thinking the new technology is harder to operate - the second reason is exacerbated by many people thinking the next step from a VCR is a DVDR (complicated) when for most it should be a PVR (simple).
bobcar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17-01-2011, 13:29
radioman2
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,327
Small markets cost more to produce. I don't suppose there's much call for a recording device that's so low image quality and uses perishable media. I probably paid about £300 for a Sharp nicam model with 4 heads and stereo output 20 years ago.
Perishable media?Still have many tapes that are 25-30 years old no problems with them so far,wonder if you could still watch today's DVDRs in 20 years time.Unless you encode today's media at a decent rate the picture quality is often worse than old VHS even in Long Play.
radioman2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17-01-2011, 19:34
David (2)
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: S.West England.
Posts: 18,032
no thats not really it, its due to LP VHS mode just runs the tape at half speed, and this makes the picture go soft. More video heads also helped to improve this. On DVDR/RW media, the only way to force more onto a disc is to use digital compression, which makes things look like lego blocks. You get the same effect with digital pictures if you zoom in really close on your PC screen, especially if your camera is only 5 or 6MP.

The human eye wont easily spot a soft picture, but will pick up on squares, on say peoples heads.

I point the earlier post above, the step on from VHS is a PVR, where you can record loads and loads to a hard disc drive with no added compression. DVD is still good for pre-recorded playback, but recordable dvd is only really any good for the odd few things you want to record and keep on the shelf for a long time.
David (2) is offline Follow this poster on Twitter   Reply With Quote
Old 17-01-2011, 19:44
r_mitchell85
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 4,884
Perishable media?Still have many tapes that are 25-30 years old no problems with them so far,wonder if you could still watch today's DVDRs in 20 years time.Unless you encode today's media at a decent rate the picture quality is often worse than old VHS even in Long Play.
^ THIS!!!
r_mitchell85 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17-01-2011, 20:04
Pugwash69
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: The Sticks
Posts: 3,720
I just mean that the number of scan lines on VHS was very low. Even if it encoded the colours in a reliable way it would be like a low quality image. Some pre-recorded music videos I still have are really bad for blues merging with reds.
I transferred a friend's old wedding video to DVD a few years back. I gave him 3 copies and all were encoded at the highest bit rate possible.
I'm perhaps hard on VHS because when TiVo launched the first time in the UK I swapped to recording regular TV digitally. My only tapes were pre-recorded stuff that I've since given away, unable to even sell on ebay.
Pugwash69 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17-01-2011, 20:20
pocatello
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 8,622
Heavy, bulky, pain to sell, obsolete, limited supply...the things will then increase in price for those who are still willing to pay, because if you actually need it, you can be charged a fair amount...otherwise they are worthless to you. And if the seller wasn't sufficiently motivated with financial incentive, they couldn't bother with such old equipment either.

If you want to see expensive, look for hi-8 decks.
pocatello is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17-01-2011, 21:34
grahamcrowden
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,017
VHS LP was shit - end of story.
I still have a couple of VCR's and I've used these to copy VHS tapes of material thats not available on dvd over to hard drive then to my own dvd's.

All my camcorder tapes needed copying too.

Like Laserdisc before it there will always be a collectors market to play back items that cannot be obtained on current formats.

Both my Panasonic VCR's are useful as they play SVHS tapes , albeit in VHS quality and they play NTSC tapes too
grahamcrowden is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17-01-2011, 21:51
Pugwash69
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: The Sticks
Posts: 3,720
nudge, nudge!
Pugwash69 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17-01-2011, 21:57
camer
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 5,043
I still use video recorders of different formats including the early vc1600 format that had the tape spools on top of each other as opposed to side by side, I find little difference in picture quality compared to dvd and the tapes do last longer than dvd. I have found that the later multi-head vhs machines give better picture quality than the mass produced dvd players though a good quality dvd player costing over 400-500 pounds might give slightly better quality pictures. As for having any value, I could sell any of my very old Sony betamax machines and buy 5 dvd players/recorders with the money, check out the prices the good ones are getting on ebay.
camer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17-01-2011, 22:06
grahamcrowden
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,017
I don't follow.

I had several NTSC tapes of films and documentaries that were not out in the UK .
That was at the time of course which is a while back.
There were some documentaries on the Bond films that were made for Laserdisc and I got them on tape aswell as some Twilight Zone episodes that were never repeated on tv.

Although twice in the last 6 months I've had to import NTSC tapes from Amazon for a mate who wanted the films and they were not out on dvd in the US or UK.

Fortunately my Pioneer dvd recorder will accept the PAL 60 output by the VCR - something that Panasonic dvd recorders won't do.
grahamcrowden is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18-01-2011, 02:46
hardylane
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Manchester
Posts: 2,945
I have a Philips VR-1000 (JVC HR-S7600) which only has brilliant and sound and picture, it has a built-in timebase corrector - excellent for transferring VHS to computer/DVD

I'm currently working my way through hundreds of tapes
hardylane is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18-01-2011, 13:05
cnbcwatcher
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: At college, in L.A.'s office
Posts: 54,214
They're becoming harder to get hold of and people still want them so the price is bound to hold a bit.

I can think of two reasons why people still want them: The first is they have loads of programmes recorded an the second is that many people (especially the elderly) thinking the new technology is harder to operate - the second reason is exacerbated by many people thinking the next step from a VCR is a DVDR (complicated) when for most it should be a PVR (simple).
Not to mention some people might have loads of VHS tapes of various movies, TV shoes etc. that are hard to find on DVD. I still have a load of VHS tapes I haven't watched in years but our VCR is just gathering dust now. I suppose it has its uses though.
cnbcwatcher is offline Follow this poster on Twitter   Reply With Quote
Old 18-01-2011, 20:19
David (2)
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: S.West England.
Posts: 18,032
If tape was so good, why didnt D-VHS win out over DVD/R/RW and PVRs?
David (2) is offline Follow this poster on Twitter   Reply With Quote
Old 18-01-2011, 20:37
fmradiotuner1
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: TheEssexSunshineCoast Clacton
Posts: 15,212
Perishable media?Still have many tapes that are 25-30 years old no problems with them so far,wonder if you could still watch today's DVDRs in 20 years time.Unless you encode today's media at a decent rate the picture quality is often worse than old VHS even in Long Play.
True as I only use SP or LSP for recordable DVDs.
Which give me 2 hours 30 mins.

On a tape you could get 4 hours in SP or up to 8 hours on LP.
LP on DVD is unwatchable.
fmradiotuner1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18-01-2011, 20:42
Nigel Goodwin
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: North Derbyshire
Posts: 41,782
If tape was so good, why didnt D-VHS win out over DVD/R/RW and PVRs?
It did absolutely nothing - too expensive, too complicated.

The whole point of DVD was the 'V', Versatile - a common format across TV and computers, for data, video and audio was always going to be a winner.
Nigel Goodwin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18-01-2011, 20:57
grahamcrowden
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,017
If tape was so good, why didnt D-VHS win out over DVD/R/RW and PVRs?
D-VHS was great from a quality point of view and was miles better quality than dvd .
But it came at a time when tape based formats were on the way out and as it was tape it was still prone to the problems inherent with any tape format.

It was better than dvd but it still needed rewinding and did not offer instant access to any section

Nobody said tape was so good anyway.
In general VHS was shit but it was the best we had for a long time
grahamcrowden is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18-01-2011, 22:11
grahamlthompson
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Redditch Worcs
Posts: 17,289
If tape was so good, why didnt D-VHS win out over DVD/R/RW and PVRs?
I had over 200 vhs cassettes of recorded content, leaving aside you could never find the right tape, the whole lot will fit on a single tiny usb hdd with instant access even in SD in DVD quality. Using modern hdd you could fit the lot in High Definition on a HDD. Welcome to the 21st century.
grahamlthompson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18-01-2011, 22:28
AidanLunn
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 5,045
It did absolutely nothing - too expensive, too complicated.

The whole point of DVD was the 'V', Versatile - a common format across TV and computers, for data, video and audio was always going to be a winner.
Wasn't it too late as well? D-VHS, ISTR reading, was launched in 2004, by which time DVD was obviously well on its way to replacing VHS.
AidanLunn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19-01-2011, 00:33
Kodaz
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,006
Wasn't it too late as well? D-VHS, ISTR reading, was launched in 2004, by which time DVD was obviously well on its way to replacing VHS.
I'm sure I remember reading about D-VHS in an Amiga magazine- IIRC before it was released- in the mid-1990s (long time ago now, but bear in mind that DVD itself came out circa 97-98 which is also a long time).

(According to Wikipedia D-VHS actually came out in 1998).
Kodaz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19-01-2011, 00:54
pocatello
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 8,622
Wasn't it too late as well? D-VHS, ISTR reading, was launched in 2004, by which time DVD was obviously well on its way to replacing VHS.
Yea Dvhs was a funny oddity, the digital theater version that is, because it recorded full hd on svhs tapes long before it was practical any other way.
pocatello is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19-01-2011, 02:39
hardylane
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Manchester
Posts: 2,945
It's all a bit of a shame.

I've been chucking out high grade VHS tapes left right and centre.

Quality magnetic tape, down the trashcan.
hardylane is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19-01-2011, 08:33
call100
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 6,570
It's all a bit of a shame.

I've been chucking out high grade VHS tapes left right and centre.

Quality magnetic tape, down the trashcan.
Don't despair....Take up a new hobby...

Uses for old VHS tapes
Crafting with VHS tape
call100 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19-01-2011, 09:46
AidanLunn
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 5,045
It's all a bit of a shame.

I've been chucking out high grade VHS tapes left right and centre.

Quality magnetic tape, down the trashcan.
I find they have their uses

I upload old adverts and things up to YouTube and my sources for material are VHS and Betamax tapes
AidanLunn is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply




 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 18:04.