|
||||||||
Why has DS given up altogether on album reviews? |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,216
|
Why has DS given up altogether on album reviews?
OK so they hadn't reviewed an album for ages and ages but now they have removed the link from the main music page and it appears there are no plans to write them any more. Admittedly they were not always the best reviews and they tended to be a little over-generous with the amount of stars they awarded but I still liked to read them and looked forward to their publication on the site. I don't understand why they would do away with them
|
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 2,386
|
They should give me the job of reviewing albums if no one in Digital Spy towers wants to do it
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 5,903
|
Quote:
They should give me the job of reviewing albums if no one in Digital Spy towers wants to do it
And because they know that the output was shite last year. |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Mr. Fahrenheit's Sex Palace.
Posts: 9,072
|
I was never bothered anyway, I won't miss that.:yawn::sleep:
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 5,903
|
Quote:
I was never bothered anyway, I won't miss that.:yawn::sleep:
(Or not with most) |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Mr. Fahrenheit's Sex Palace.
Posts: 9,072
|
Quote:
True, I did prefer to judge albums myself.
(Or not with most) If I'm going to pay attention to critics, it's going to be something dedicated to music, like Rolling Stone or Q, or the averages on Metacritic. One internet review isn't enough. |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 5,903
|
Quote:
It's Digital Spy - they hand out stars like John Mayer talks about his cock.
If I'm going to pay attention to critics, it's going to be something dedicated to music, like Rolling Stone or Q, or the averages on Metacritic. One internet review isn't enough. |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Watford
Posts: 15,815
|
Their album reviews were actually pretty solid in many cases. There were loads of great albums released last year as well. Also, they used to review less-mainstream acts like Royksopp and Goldfrapp, which I liked about them.
It's just the single reviews which have gone down the toilet over the last 6 months. I've been a regular to the site since 2009, and back then they were mostly impartial and objective, but now they just fawn over their favourite pop acts and give out 5-star ratings like confetti. Their reviews are actually embarrassing to read at times now, with the constant over-excitement over any song by today's big popstars like Cheryl, Katy Perry, Britney etc. There is literally no point in reading most of the single reviews now, unless you want to read someone basically saying things like 'OMG Britney's back, amazing, 5 stars!' or 'We love Cheryl Cole because she's really popular!'. Another thing is. they suck up to Popjustice big time - anything they like automatically gets a high rating from DS, and they've made it known on several occasions that they love Popjustice so it's pretty obvious. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Kylie Minogue's Bedroom.
Posts: 4,354
|
frankly i never even noticed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Mr. Fahrenheit's Sex Palace.
Posts: 9,072
|
Quote:
Their album reviews were actually pretty solid in many cases. There were loads of great albums released last year as well. Also, they used to review less-mainstream acts like Royksopp and Goldfrapp, which I liked about them.
It's just the single reviews which have gone down the toilet over the last 6 months. I've been a regular to the site since 2009, and back then they were mostly impartial and objective, but now they just fawn over their favourite pop acts and give out 5-star ratings like confetti. Their reviews are actually embarrassing to read at times now, with the constant over-excitement over any song by today's big popstars like Cheryl, Katy Perry, Britney etc. There is literally no point in reading most of the single reviews now, unless you want to read someone basically saying things like 'OMG Britney's back, amazing, 5 stars!' or 'We love Cheryl Cole because she's really popular!'. Another thing is. they suck up to Popjustice big time - anything they like automatically gets a high rating from DS, and they've made it known on several occasions that they love Popjustice so it's pretty obvious.
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 5,469
|
Yeah last week I was wondering what they thought of Rihanna 'Loud' album, which I love, and I can't remember them saying anything about it. So looked at the reviews section and then noticed they hadn't reviewed it, or any other albums for ages. Guess they can't be bothered.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 737
|
They have pretty bad and blatantly biased reviews in the music category but their gaming and film ones are good.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 7,408
|
Stopped reading them after they decided to review some useless X-Factor album over the new Metallica one, which stayed at No. 1 for 2 weeks.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Middesbrough (via Manchester)
Posts: 37,343
|
Reviewing albums is probably a real chore. With films you can see it once and review it with no issues. With games you can play small parts of it to get a feel for the game and then review it like that. Albums, you need to give yourself enough time to listen and not do anything else (because you won't really be paying attention enough to review it) and then perhaps listen several times. Further to that, it'll depend on the availability of the albums. If they're not sent a promo copy or have access to a stream to listen to, they'd have to buy it... which was probably why we only seen a handful of albums reviewed.
On top of that, I agree that there was a clear bias on reviews, but isn't the the case with all publications? I mean Kerrang aren't going to review a Rihanna album. |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 7,408
|
Quote:
On top of that, I agree that there was a clear bias on reviews, but isn't the the case with all publications? I mean Kerrang aren't going to review a Rihanna album.
To be fair to them though, they did review Nickleback and Guns N' Roses. Actually, I think their GNR Chinese Democracy review was the fairest one I've read, very sensibly balanced with pure focus on the music and none of the focus on the long gestation period which other reviewers were fixated with. |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Middesbrough (via Manchester)
Posts: 37,343
|
Quote:
This argument is often raised on these forums as to why heavier music is often overlooked by publications, but the fact is that it only applies to a publication that sets their stall out. No, Kerrang won't review Rihanna, and Popjustice won't review Iron Maiden. But DS never made a claim to be a pop music website - it's supposed to cover a broader spectrum.
To be fair to them though, they did review Nickleback and Guns N' Roses. Actually, I think their GNR Chinese Democracy review was the fairest one I've read, very sensibly balanced with pure focus on the music and none of the focus on the long gestation period which other reviewers were fixated with. |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 7,408
|
Quote:
If you look at the content of the website in general it's very pop culture. It's biggest stories are usually showbiz and celebrity related. There's a few "alternative" things on the site but on a whole it's very focused on pop culture, which is why the albums they did review were mainly from acts you'd hear on Radio 1 and commercial radio.
By treating albums equally, I don't mean I expect them to review the latest Opeth or Cannibal Corpse. But an album like Metallica's, or Iron Maiden's, which despite being metal both topped the album charts, are surely worthy of consideration. |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Middesbrough (via Manchester)
Posts: 37,343
|
Quote:
But it never claims to be, and that's what annoys me. Either set your stall out, or treat all the albums equally.
By treating albums equally, I don't mean I expect them to review the latest Opeth or Cannibal Corpse. But an album like Metallica's, or Iron Maiden's, which despite being metal both topped the album charts, are surely worthy of consideration. Digital Spy is pretty much a celebrity magazine on the internet and it's audience come here for that. |
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 7,408
|
Their music news though is often very broad. I've seen articles on Avenged Sevenfold, Disturbed, Bullet For My Valentine, Slash etc. Just wonder why they report on the wider music world but only bother reviewing pop releases?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Middesbrough (via Manchester)
Posts: 37,343
|
Quote:
Their music news though is often very broad. I've seen articles on Avenged Sevenfold, Disturbed, Bullet For My Valentine, Slash etc. Just wonder why they report on the wider music world but only bother reviewing pop releases?
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 15:45.


