Originally Posted by brangdon:
“Please identify more precisely what she said that she knew wasn't true. She talked quite a lot and you shouldn't expect me to find in that the bit you mean, especially if it's not something I'm agreeing is a lie.”
Heidi got caught between two arguments - we wrote the words ogether and I couldn't put enough attention into writing the words as I had to manage Frank. She seemed to admit writing the verbose descriptions, claimed Frank was involved too and then blamed him from stopping her getting it right. Our problem is we don't see enough of who did what or what distracted her to know the extent of Frank as a factor, either writing it or hindering it - or to know whats confusion, or not explained well enough, about the extent of his input, or self contradiction.
The biggest question was left unanswered - which was why she failed to give the presentation agreed and why she was generally under par for the entire task?
Kristine's sacking made little sense in the big scheme of things, If the number was wrong where did it come from - and was it indeed wrong? If it was wrong does it matter when checking it would be a job for a minor clerical grade? Trump obviously doesn't know what number to ring. so how low down does he want management involved in detail? Even if it mattered, how do you assess a mistake made by the person doing all the work when the other is asleep - the person asleep should have been checking things like that. By Trump logic, sleeping and doing nothng is a winning strategy.
.”
