Originally Posted by f_196:
“Haven't watched for a few months, gave it a try again last week.
Still not for me.
There's a serious problem when TNA in 2009-2010 was much better than it is now. It's completely lost sight with it's identity. It was never going to challenge WWE and it shouldn't have changed to attempt/emulate this.”
Right now it's the only wrestling show for me. WWE is way too overexposed for me to care until the 'road to wrestlemania', what with 3 hour Raw, Main Event (not shown) and 2 hour Smackdown. With only one show, I can follow the pace of TNA, the shows are mostly logical and consistent, a lot of strong matches this year, and the PPVs have been good.
Originally Posted by JasonWatkins:
“how is it funny ?
nothing to say they couldn't fill a good percentage of it. sure they're unlikely to sell it out without giving away a number of tickets, but there's no reason why they can't get a good crowd”
70,000? With comps they didn't reach 3,000 for Bound for Glory. It seems many of the houseshows struggle to sell tickets, viewership is down and many yanks don't even seem aware of TNA, or according to some modern WWE.
Basically interest in wrestling has been down year-on-year. The WWE as a brand and Wrestlemania are still big, but wrestling isn't in a great place. They could sell more tickets by advertising to the Latin demographic, but TNA doesn't have a Mistico or Mysterio.