• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • Big Brother
Radio 1 - Get Michelle out
<<
<
2 of 5
>>
>
Shelley
27-07-2004
Originally Posted by da33431:
“Since when do I need your permission?? Unless you personally are going to into every thread about any other housemate and ask that the criticism stop then you yourself are a hypocrite - the fact is that you like Michelle and can't bear the criticism about her. You like her because she is crass and vulgar, but I'm not allowed to be - yeah, that makes sense!! ”

Re-read the post. Nothing mentioned about MY permission.
Opaque
27-07-2004
Originally Posted by Shelley:
“So? Does that give FMs the right to be vulgar, crass, demeaning, etc.???? NO.”

Towards the HM's, yes.
That is part of the reason behind this forum isn't it?
If these people are doing things, we react, it's not all just bas stuff though, look at how much fun they have given us when responding to the funny things or rude things that we enjoy.

They know they are being watched all the time, it is their choice to behave a certain way. If they have to behave 'badly' to win then thats their choice (fair enough though that is the idea of the game). But we have the right to slag them off for it. Yes some, less this year, is down to biased editing but most is down to the person themselves.

I would be interested to know what sort of deals these remaining HM's will be getting as for Michelle, beyond some PA's or some desperate OK/Hello spread I can't see much. But am willing to be proved wrong.
LV15
27-07-2004
evict michelle...she turned me into a newt



(i got better)
Shelley
27-07-2004
Originally Posted by Histeria:
“Whilst I wouldn't use some of he language thrown at these people, Michelle and Stu have pretty much given permission for people to say what they like about them by appearing on the show. It is a popularity contest, and people are judged my their word and deed. In the case of Stu and Michelle, some have been less than impressed. I'm not keen on the language used by some (and will even defend M & S from them) but BB must be one of the only situations where giving your opinion on a complete stranger is perfectly acceptable - since by definition they are openly inviting it.”

I have no problem with the HMs giving people the right to view them, criticise them, cogitate, disagree, etc. I do have a problem with vulgarity and verbal massacre, as I said before.
afcbfan
27-07-2004
Originally Posted by Shelley:
“So? Does that give FMs the right to be vulgar, crass, demeaning, etc.???? NO.”

It doesn't, but that's the nature of the beast, I guess. If the contestants want to whore themselves for the nations entertainment then it's inevitable. I do wonder why people actually apply for the programme, given that's the case.
yellowlabbie
27-07-2004
Originally Posted by Shelley:
“LOL - do you? Really?”

I may be a lot of things. but I am not vulgar and have never been vulgar on this forum, hope you are not insinuating that I am?
Shelley
27-07-2004
Originally Posted by Opaque:
“Towards the HM's, yes.
That is part of the reason behind this forum isn't it?”

Actually, no. This forum is for debate and an exchange of views, opinions, etc. Vulgarity and vicious verbal assault, no.
Shelley
27-07-2004
Originally Posted by yellowlabbie:
“I may be a lot of things. but I am not vulgar and have never been vulgar on this forum, hope you are not insinuating that I am?”

Errrrr.....no!
LV15
27-07-2004
Originally Posted by yellowlabbie:
“I may be a lot of things. but I am not vulgar and have never been vulgar on this forum, hope you are not insinuating that I am?”

well whenever i see your name i think of jaundised labia, but then thats just my sick mind so i suppose i can't blame you for that vulgarity
cougar 662
27-07-2004
Originally Posted by ArtyAttack:
“Michelle will be busy from Friday night if she is evicted. She will be signing all sorts of deals.”


Im sure the executives from Slimfast will be after her as well. For the 'before I lost weight' advertising campaign..not the 'after' one.
yellowlabbie
27-07-2004
Originally Posted by Shelley:
“Errrrr.....no!”

Don't believe you.
yellowlabbie
27-07-2004
Originally Posted by LV15:
“well whenever i see your name i think of jaundised labia, but then thats just my sick mind so i suppose i can't blame you for that vulgarity”

That's kind of you.
da33431
27-07-2004
Shelley, tell us which posts you consider as crass or vulgar then......
Shelley
27-07-2004
Originally Posted by yellowlabbie:
“Don't believe you.”

Then that's your issue, not mine.
Stewing
27-07-2004
Originally Posted by Histeria:
“Whilst I wouldn't use some of he language thrown at these people, Michelle and Stu have pretty much given permission for people to say what they like about them by appearing on the show. It is a popularity contest, and people are judged my their word and deed. In the case of Stu and Michelle, some have been less than impressed. I'm not keen on the language used by some (and will even defend Michelle & Stu from them) but BB must be one of the only situations where giving your opinion, no matter how harsh, on a complete stranger is perfectly acceptable - since by definition they are openly inviting it.”

Exactly and that say it all and this thread is really dumb.All this damn moralising when it is in defense to of 2 grown ups who know they are being watched and do not give a damn,who sees their outrageous behavious..It is not outrageous in the confines of their own homes etc but on TV in front of 8 million people.They deserve every lashing they get so call Fms rude is patently absurd. I note the person who started this thread has failed to spot the tons of men using "old fashioned" language and by default have to be over 45 who put a hundred posts a day up about heir love of perivng...!!!That is not only rude it is a bit sick....
PamelaL
27-07-2004
Originally Posted by LV15:
“well whenever i see your name i think of jaundised labia, but then thats just my sick mind so i suppose i can't blame you for that vulgarity”


See how people's minds work because whenever I see his/her name I always think of a lovely golden labrador
archy121
27-07-2004
Originally Posted by rosemary:
“I feel sorry for the poor girl...both her and Stuart

They are just a pair of kids...its all a bit sad really ”

Kids ?? you are KIDDING right ?

Them two make me cringe. Its sickening how they carry on in front of others with no consideration how they might feel watching them -more Michelle carry on like a possessed dog on heat.

Agreed Stu probably is a kid as well as naive and a unconfessed transvestite (strong tendencies to wear girly stuff).

But Michelle.. boy you are so wrong & blind.
She is clearly a wannabe PORNSTAR - nothing kid about that.

She is a shameless cradle snatcher & her character resembles a used condom. One word to describe her in truest form
- M I N G E R
LV15
27-07-2004
Originally Posted by PamelaL:
“See how people's minds work because whenever I see his/her name I always think of a lovely golden labrador ”

i'd much rather think of a nice doggy but intead i get pictures of diseased and possibly mutated genitals in my head.

i think i watch too much teletubbies
Shelley
27-07-2004
Originally Posted by da33431:
“Shelley, tell us which posts you consider as crass or vulgar then......”

See above post.
lots2do
27-07-2004
Hooray for Radio 1. I know I keep repeating myself, but that girl has got to go. Did you see her on BB last night? When she started her whining in the kitchen AGAIN because Stu was making bread with Shell. Her eyes had an evil look, almost deranged and giving a very needy pathetic look at the same time. It made me shiver...

Shell always seems to become slightly more vocal and animated when Michelle starts her bread whining. She seems embarrassed at Michelle's behaviour. If I was Shell I'd have told her to 'f*** off and grow up' by now.

Michelle has a real envy of Shell. I laughed at the time when Shell and Victor had their big post-wedding barney. The first thing Michelle did was corner Shell in the bedroom and attempted to persuade her to take the dress off. Yeah, like that's really gonna help. The only reason she wanted Shell out of that dress was because she didn't get to wear it herself.

I think that if the house had to do nominations this week, Michelle would definately have been nominated. Any campaigning from the outside world can only be a good thing in my eyes!
suprnova
27-07-2004
get the minging cow out....
PamelaL
27-07-2004
Originally Posted by LV15:
“i'd much rather think of a nice doggy but intead i get pictures of diseased and possibly mutated genitals in my head.

i think i watch too much teletubbies”


LOL Sing with me now "raindrops on roses and whiskers on kittens..."
ejim03
27-07-2004
Originally Posted by da33431:
“Scott Mills sitting in for Chris Moyles on breakfast all week is really hammering the Get the Bunny Boiler out campaign. He is also going on BBLB on Thursday to tell Dermot how much he hates her! Good work Scott! ”

Good man! Lets hope he can swing it.
Opaque
27-07-2004
Originally Posted by Shelley:
“Actually, no. This forum is for debate and an exchange of views, opinions, etc. Vulgarity and vicious verbal assault, no.”

And you're saying that to have an exchange of views and a debate we aren't allowed to say what we actually feel?
Because thats what it sounds like.

And if you're talking about vulgarity and vicious verbal assault, we could just copy out bits from whats happened in the house and that would come under that heading, or even bits from the official website. That story yesterday about leakage after sex? I'm guessing you'd call that vulgar, but anyone discussing that would simply be discussing what was going on.
LV15
27-07-2004
raindrops on roses and whiskers on kittens and
stab stab stab burn burn stab burn stab stab burn
<<
<
2 of 5
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map