|
||||||||
The Ratings Thread (Part 17) |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#251 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 50,506
|
Quote:
there is a huge differnce between The One Show, and OK! TV.
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#252 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: nr Peterborough, England
Posts: 48,127
|
and before its deleted https://twitter.com/Channel5Press Quote:
denise_vanouten Had a great day at @OKTVOfficial towers with @Mattjohnsons. So excited about our new show
Quote:
# and are delighted to have her on board to co-present this fantastic new show" 11 minutes ago via web brilliant, I am so glad I got out of bed todayand before its deleted# We all know how fantastic and experienced Kate is following her time on Live From Studio Five 11 minutes ago via web # “We are delighted to announce that Kate Walsh will be stepping up to present OK! TV with Matt Johnson https://twitter.com/Channel5Press Quote:
denise_vanouten Had a great day at @OKTVOfficial towers with @Mattjohnsons. So excited about our new show
Quote:
# and are delighted to have her on board to co-present this fantastic new show" 11 minutes ago via web brilliant, I am so glad I got out of bed today# We all know how fantastic and experienced Kate is following her time on Live From Studio Five 11 minutes ago via web # “We are delighted to announce that Kate Walsh will be stepping up to present OK! TV with Matt Johnson Quote:
With respect, you're missing the point.
|
|
|
|
|
#253 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: London
Posts: 13,404
|
Quote:
Funny. I don't remember this much fuss when Jason Manford was forced to quit The One Show just a few weeks into the role over his pervy behaviour on Twitter.
Just shows this thread's ridiculous double standards. It gets worse by the day. Your obsession with this channel is hilarious!
|
|
|
|
#254 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 7,477
|
Quote:
Funny. I don't remember this much fuss when Jason Manford was forced to quit The One Show just a few weeks into the role over his pervy behaviour on Twitter.
Just shows this thread's ridiculous double standards. It gets worse by the day. ![]() Personally I just think OK TV sounds like trash. Kate is inoffensive and attracive but she's a dreadful presenter, and in all honesty not a great anchor for a new show. |
|
|
|
|
#255 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 50,506
|
Quote:
Not ideal from C5's perspective as any similarity with LFSF will be even more pronounced.Although I'm chuffed for Kate, she clearly enjoys working on these shows and comes across a lovely lady. It's probably their best bet at this late stage. Kate should be able to slip into the role easier than anyone else. |
|
|
|
|
#256 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: nr Peterborough, England
Posts: 48,127
|
Quote:
It's probably their best bet at this late stage. Kate should be able to slip into the role easier than anyone else.
The problem is OK! TV now looks even more like a rebranded LfS5 than it did before. |
|
|
|
|
#257 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: West Midlands
Posts: 5,294
|
Quote:
Funny. I don't remember this much fuss when Jason Manford was forced to quit The One Show just a few weeks into the role over his pervy behaviour on Twitter.
Just shows this thread's ridiculous double standards. It gets worse by the day. |
|
|
|
|
#258 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 18,788
|
Marchlands has done very well so far. It's exactly the sort of drama ITV should be attempting so it's please to see that it held onto 89% of its premiere audience which is a really good retention for any new drama. Next week, though, will be more testing with MasterChef and UEFA Cup on so I expect it'll fall to the high 4's/low 5's level. Regarding a possible recommission, I don't think there's much scope for it to come back because the show concentrates on one specific story on certain characters so I can't see it returning, especially as two of the main actors are now busy with US dramas (Terra Nova and Private Practice) and unlikely to have time to commit to another series of this.
With its series finished, Not Going Out averaged 4.1m for its 6 episodes in the overnights, with timeshift/iPlayer still to come. I think that hopefully should be good enough for another series - I know it's dipped under 4m for the last two episodes but given the lack of lead-in and silly decision to still have it begin at 9:30pm half-way through most other programmes which is really difficult, I think it's done fine. Interesting multichannel ratings yesterday. A very good start for Mad Dogs but not surprising at all because it has been promoted so much by Sky over the last few weeks, they've got billboard up for it and have a really good cast so it was always going to be close to that million mark. It seems to have been well received by people who watched it so I don't think it'll drop much next week (maybe down to ~800k). A strong return for Celebrity Juice, especially now that it's no longer got Katie Price's 1m+ lead-in anymore. With a 26 episode order for this year, it's now pretty much become ITV2's flagship original series. Skins is struggling a bit this series. I know that 670k (inc. +1) for an E4 show is a great rating but there's always higher expectations with a show like Skins and given that ratings seem to be going lower and lower by the week and that it must be at E4's high-end in terms of cost for programming, could this generation be the show's last one? I know it could just be the characters putting people off and this could be fixed with new characters for the next generation but I just think if the ratings continue to decline (say to something like 500k or under inc. +1), is that really good enough for a scripted drama on E4? The channel could spend the money saved by dropping Skins on an original programme rather than revamping a show which I suspect is now close to reaching its limit creatively and hasn't got much more to offer. |
|
|
|
|
#259 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 469
|
Quote:
for what its worth I do agree with that, OK! TV wont be anymore taxing on her skills as a presenter from Live From Studio Five.
The problem is OK! TV now looks even more like a rebranded LfS5 than it did before. |
|
|
|
|
#260 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 50,506
|
Quote:
I think the difference is that by that stage The One Show had proven it could get 4-5m no matter who presented it. When Adrian & Christine went there was pages and pages of discussion on here about it.
![]() Quote:
Personally I just think OK TV sounds like trash. Kate is inoffensive and attracive but she'sa dreadful presenter, and in all honesty not a great anchor for a new show???
As for it sounding like trash, maybe you're not in the TA. I don't, and never would, buy the mag. But half a million people do every week. Chances are they will enjoy this programme. |
|
|
|
|
#261 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: nr Peterborough, England
Posts: 48,127
|
Quote:
That's exactly what it is, but with the OK magazine tie in, it's Desmond self promoting his media empire.
|
|
|
|
|
#262 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: London
Posts: 8,882
|
Well the ratings for Mondays show will be very interesting.
|
|
|
|
|
#263 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: nr Peterborough, England
Posts: 48,127
|
Quote:
But half a million people do every week. Chances are they will enjoy this programme.
|
|
|
|
|
#264 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 157
|
Quote:
true of course, but given the ratings fro LfS5, I am sure Channel 5 was hoping it would be seen as a whole new show, rather than a rebranded LfS5
RE: Ratings Same ratings as Studio 5 got on its launch I would think? The promotion of the show has been poor, I've seen 1 ad for it and thats it. |
|
|
|
#265 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 50,506
|
Quote:
That's exactly what it is, but with the OK magazine tie in, it's Desmond self promoting his media empire.
OK! TV (in some form) enjoyed a run on ITV, did it not? |
|
|
|
|
#266 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: exeter
Posts: 14,622
|
I think there's every reason to wish that Desmond's rather down-market views for a terrestrial channel fails. I don't like the mags and newspapers he produces (except for the Asian porn, obviously) and would rather not see a channel promoting poor journalism and crass slebs.
Just my point of view
|
|
|
|
|
#267 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: nr Peterborough, England
Posts: 48,127
|
Quote:
But, it was never really going to be a new show anyway. Its the same format, same everything really apart from the name and one of the presenters. It was really only changed from LFS5 so Dickie could cross promote OK! mag with OK! the TV show.
|
|
|
|
|
#268 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 50,506
|
Quote:
But, it was never really going to be a new show anyway. Its the same format, same everything really apart from the name and one of the presenters. It was really only changed from LFS5 so Dickie could cross promote OK! mag with OK! the TV show.
RE: Ratings Same ratings as Studio 5 got on its launch I would think? The promotion of the show has been poor, I've seen 1 ad for it and thats it. As for ratings, it will probably do the usual 0.3-0.4m. Zoo Days has been rating in that sort of area this week so I see no reason why that would suddenly change. If OK! TV is to be a success, it will need time to grow its audience, because C5 hasn't faired well in that slot for a long time. |
|
|
|
|
#269 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 157
|
Quote:
but the ratings for LfS5 were awful, no point launching a new show if you are happy to accpet those numbers, Desmond would have had better results just having OK! sponosring Live From Studio Five.
|
|
|
|
#270 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: nr Peterborough, England
Posts: 48,127
|
and having one of the regulars hosts of LfS5, launching OK!TV is hardly going to help the shows image.
|
|
|
|
|
#271 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: London
Posts: 13,404
|
Quote:
I think there's every reason to wish that Desmond's rather down-market views for a terrestrial channel fails. I don't like the mags and newspapers he produces (except for the Asian porn, obviously) and would rather not see a channel promoting poor journalism and crass slebs.
Just my point of view ![]() http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/gree...defence-league He makes money by producing and selling undeniable shit. There's no doubt he'll be doing with Five what he did with his publications. He deserves no respect. |
|
|
|
#272 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 157
|
Quote:
Firstly, promotion hasn't been poor, it has been extensive across the entire C5 network, albeit one short ad but used excessively. Secondly, how do you know the format is the same? Not much info has been released. Let's see on Monday shall we before we jump to any convenient conclusions.
As for ratings, it will probably do the usual 0.3-0.4m. Zoo Days has been rating in that sort of area this week so I see no reason why that would suddenly change. If OK! TV is to be a success, it will need time to grow its audience, because C5 hasn't faired well in that slot for a long time. And its already been announced that the show will be a mix of "big name interviews, gossip and celebrity banter" The same type of format Studio 5 had. |
|
|
|
#273 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: nr Peterborough, England
Posts: 48,127
|
Quote:
Especially when he's fine with one of his publications printing this:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/gree...defence-league |
|
|
|
|
#274 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 157
|
Quote:
and having one of the regulars hosts of LfS5, launching OK!TV is hardly going to help the shows image.
They need to work their backsides off and promote the show outside of ad's on Channel 5 to make it work. |
|
|
|
#275 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: nr Peterborough, England
Posts: 48,127
|
Quote:
I agree, the show is already off to a bad start.
They need to work their backsides off and promote the show outside of ad's on Channel 5 to make it work. |
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 04:19.



Your obsession with this channel is hilarious!


