I'll summarise the key points from the Broadcast interview, without repeating what Robbie has put in his summary of the Times interview:
- He again says he wants to make the channel 'the best in the world'.
- Every genre is being looked at with a view to an evolution and, in some cases, a more radical shift in direction.
-More factual at 9pm: "“Factual on BBC1 has to be either phenomenally bold in its scale or very entertaining, but I also want it to be more lithe, so the channel is aware of, and taking part in, the national conversations. There are opportunities in pre and post watershed for factual to be very of the moment. People don’t want to know just what facts are, they want to know what facts feel like.”
- More bold, risky drama: "You don’t do really special, ambitious programming unless you take big risks and are prepared to fail. Those kinds of programme have a percentage of failure built into them. Unless you are able to accept that you might end up with egg on your face, you will never do the most exciting pieces. We are up for that risk, because we believe you can be bold and creatively risky while also being intelligent – intelligence and populism can go hand in hand.”
- Pre-watershed: building comedy and possibly introducing more live tv. Wants to find the next Only Fools and Horses - a comedy with warmth and enduring appeal. Wants tv that represents everyone, "everyone pays the license fee".
- On scheduling: “I think people want consistency – they don’t want the same show moved around. But it’s about creatively scheduling new series, or event pieces like the royal wedding.”
- On potential budget cuts: There are things you can do around scheduling, focusing on the richness of key primetime hours and so on. I don’t know all the answers for BBC1, but those are the things we did on 3. You try to do everything you can to make sure the audience doesn’t notice."
- On 2012: Wants to make it "an absolutely outstanding year on BBC1."
Has also approached some 'national treasures' to work on the channel.