|
||||||||
Are there now too FEW soaps? |
![]() |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Tyler Moons bedroom
Posts: 9,245
|
Are there now too FEW soaps?
Dreaming back 20 + years we had Corrie,Eastenders Emmerdale AND Brookside,Dallas Dynasty,Take the high road,Crossroads, Falcon Crest Prisoner Cell block H, Sons and Daughters,A Country practice,Richmond Hill,The Sullivans, The Young Doctors, Howards Way, The Colbys, Families, The Flying Doctors, Knots Landing, Albion Market
Now we have the Big 3 and a handful of others.We dont seem to have a television environment that will take risks soap wise anymore.There was more experimenting and risk taking in the past.The BBC lost its nerve soapwise after Eldorado and I dont think ITV have tried anything new since Night and Day flopped. Its as if its not guaranteed to be as sucessful viewing figures wise as the big 3 and last for decades then its not worth trying.Whats wrong with experimenting creatively with soaps who are likely to run a much shorter period than Corries 50 years?Whats wrong with a good run of 5 years,8 years etc?Come on TV execs be daring,be creative and dont always use the big 3 as the yardstick of sucess in a narrow way. ![]()
|
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Ireland
Posts: 3,973
|
re : A good run of 5 or 8 years
Yeah, that's alright for the viewers. But think of the team, the inital costs - the set costs, all the filimng equipment, all those producers, bagging your production to whatever channel.... It'll be alright in the long run if they cover their costs but it's be very cost-sore just to do a soap for 5 years IMHO
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 5,250
|
I consider EE and Corrie the main two. I don't watch Emmerdale but respect it. Hollyoaks deserves an axe due to how unprofessional it is. There's also Neighbours and Home & Away. Surely that's enough?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Tyler Moons bedroom
Posts: 9,245
|
But if no one takes that chance thered have never been a Corrie or Eastenders.
Plus the beauty of big media organisations like the BBC is that bigger more popular productions make most of the money like Big Brother for C4 or the movie studio system were big blockbusters prop up and allow more thoughtful but less popular films to be made. The news on ITV or SKY for instance operates at a loss but the bigger ventures enable the companys./channels to absorb this. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Tyler Moons bedroom
Posts: 9,245
|
BBC should step up to the plate and have 2 big soaps like ITV but keep them distinct.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Guest
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 6,408
|
There are only 3 proper soaps nowadays, they should bring back Family Affairs
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 3,075
|
No, there's too many! Hollyoaks and Eastenders are all that's needed
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 14,371
|
I think there is enough you count 4 UK soaps and the two aussie ones it makes 6 a whole lot of viewing time there.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 8,861
|
Quote:
I consider EE and Corrie the main two. I don't watch Emmerdale but respect it. Hollyoaks deserves an axe due to how unprofessional it is. There's also Neighbours and Home & Away. Surely that's enough?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 5,066
|
I think the problem is that the few soaps that are still on air are on too much.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: digging a tunnel
Posts: 6,434
|
Quote:
I think the problem is that the few soaps that are still on air are on too much.
I liked Eldorado . I thought the BBC gave up on it too soon without giving it time to establish itself and develop. Yes it was a bit ropey to start with but as time went on some of the better actors were coming to the fore and it was definitely improving.I enjoyed Night and Day as a guilty pleasure but it really was pretty ludicrous. A good soap needs to be as realistic as possible, we're not Americans dahling. ![]() If Channel 5 want to be taken seriously as a contender to the four main network channels they should give up their reliance on the tired Australian soaps that most people stopped watching 10 years ago and look at developing a soap of their own. They won't of course. Desmond is far more interested in investing in trashy magazine shows and Big Brother. |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: West Midlands
Posts: 29,512
|
Quote:
BBC should step up to the plate and have 2 big soaps like ITV but keep them distinct.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 5,583
|
Quote:
Dreaming back 20 + years we had Corrie,Eastenders Emmerdale AND Brookside,Dallas Dynasty,Take the high road,Crossroads, Falcon Crest Prisoner Cell block H, Sons and Daughters,A Country practice,Richmond Hill,The Sullivans, The Young Doctors, Howards Way, The Colbys, Families, The Flying Doctors, Knots Landing, Albion Market
Now we have the Big 3 and a handful of others.We dont seem to have a television environment that will take risks soap wise anymore.There was more experimenting and risk taking in the past.The BBC lost its nerve soapwise after Eldorado and I dont think ITV have tried anything new since Night and Day flopped. Its as if its not guaranteed to be as sucessful viewing figures wise as the big 3 and last for decades then its not worth trying.Whats wrong with experimenting creatively with soaps who are likely to run a much shorter period than Corries 50 years?Whats wrong with a good run of 5 years,8 years etc?Come on TV execs be daring,be creative and dont always use the big 3 as the yardstick of sucess in a narrow way. ![]() ![]() Coronation Street East Enders Emmerdale Hollyoaks Doctors Neighbours Casualty Holby City That is eight that I know about. Also if you look at the Satellite /Cable/Freeview channels you will find many more (mainly American) soaps. Also a lot of drama series now include soap elements in them. Modern versions of The Professionals and The Sweeny would include much more about the characters personal lives than the originals did. The real problem is that television generally does not produce as much Drama as it used to and that is would needs to change. |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Cheshire Nr. Coronation Street
Posts: 228
|
I'm surprised Channel 4 or 5 hasn't tried to bring out a new 'big one'. C4 had Brookside but thats now history
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 2,835
|
Quote:
I think the problem is that the few soaps that are still on air are on too much.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 3,290
|
I only think about there being 4 soaps - EastEnders, Corrie, Emmerdale and Hollyoaks. I think the BBC should make a new one, or just put a repeat of Doctors on later on in the day so people who can't see it because of work, school etc. can watch it. Doctors is really good from what I've seen. Neighbours always had a repeat slot on BBC1, they should axe The Weakest Link and put on Doctors.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 1,612
|
I think that many people are simply not prepared to put in the hours getting to know a new set of characters. If a new soap was to begin, I honestly think they would have to introduce one family at a time rather than introduce the whole ensemble in a oner!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,347
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by rossyrahrah;48*****6
I agree with that. More quality, less quantity. 2-3 episodes per week really should be the maximum. It would certainly give both scriptwriters and actors more time to work on and develop storylines and characterisation.
I liked Eldorado . I thought the BBC gave up on it too soon without giving it time to establish itself and develop. Yes it was a bit ropey to start with but as time went on some of the better actors were coming to the fore and it was definitely improving.I enjoyed Night and Day as a guilty pleasure but it really was pretty ludicrous. A good soap needs to be as realistic as possible, we're not Americans dahling. ![]() If Channel 5 want to be taken seriously as a contender to the four main network channels they should give up their reliance on the tired Australian soaps that most people stopped watching 10 years ago and look at developing a soap of their own. They won't of course. Desmond is far more interested in investing in trashy magazine shows and Big Brother. |
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Lancashire
Posts: 7,140
|
The OP named lots of soaps that were on 20-odd years ago, but didn't really take into account that there were less episode back then...a maximum of 2, maybe 3 per week. Nowadays, the soaps are all scheduled to be screened 4-6 times per week - a lot of screen time!
I must admit however, on Wednesday, when there was no Emmerdale because of the football, I felt a bit lost...only HO, Neighbours and H+A - none of which I watch. |
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,125
|
There would appear to be less soaps on TV probably because UK TV doesn't show as many imported soaps as they used to. In primetime, the homegrown soaps have become less in number but the amount of hours that they are on have increased so the schedules are still saturated with soaps.
The daytime schedules on the other hand only really have Doctors, Home and Away and Neighbours. However, the only other foreign soap that I can think of that they'd potentially air in daytime is Shortland Street. Aside from Sunset Beach, US daytime soaps have never really taken off on terrestrial TV and there aren't any Knots Landing or Falcon Crest style schedule fillers like there was in the 80's. And Aussie TV now only produces 2 soaps (H&A and Neighbours) so we don't have the choice that we used to when they were churning out a multitude of soaps like Sons and Daughters, A Country Practice etc. |
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 25,385
|
I think it's probably better to stick to what we've got now. The more soaps there are, the more chance for similar storylines and more ridicolous plots to compete for airtime.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,125
|
Quote:
I think it's probably better to stick to what we've got now. The more soaps there are, the more chance for similar storylines and more ridicolous plots to compete for airtime.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 5,066
|
Quote:
Channel 5 should never have axed family affairs, it was going for stregnth to stregnth and won its first BSA. This was there own home grown soap, money was better invested in this rather than purchasing Neighbours from BBC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Earth
Posts: 4,763
|
I think there are too many soaps tbh
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,347
|
Quote:
It's funny because Family Affairs was axed because of low ratings, but now Home and Away is getting similar ratings (and sometimes does even worse.)
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 13:19.





