Originally Posted by simon243:
“But according to Global, it didn't work on Galaxy.”
And why should we believe the very same company which claimed that there weren't however many local 'good' presenters available to work on all their stations as justification for dismissing them all in the name of corporate greed?
Originally Posted by simon243:
“Yes, Galaxy was popular and credible with listeners but the national ad agencies didn't get it and it didn't make money.”
Didn't it? Are you seriously saying that Galaxy 105, as the largest radio station in the country outside London, never made a profit? If they didn't make much money, then how on earth are significantly smaller stations viable?
Originally Posted by simon243:
“ And when it comes to the crunch, that's all that matters.”
And therein lies the problem with commercial radio - it devotes too much energy to chasing the bottom line, which, in the long run, in my view, only hurts this aim.
I do not dispute the importance of viability, but I also think that the stations comprising the Capital network should adhere to the formats for which they licences were awarded. If Global don't want to do this, they should sell them, or, allow the licences to be re-advertised if they want to get the formats changed.
I thought the problem with Galaxy was the name, and its absence from London on FM, and said advertising agencies apparently not owning DAB radios, or knowing how to listen to radio stations from elsewhere in the country via other digital platforms or the Internet. But no, not the format. Hence Capital almost disappearing last year instead of Galaxy.
And if the music is the problem, why do Kiss still have so much specialist output? I don't see them falling miles behind Capital, despite Capital having a rather more mainstream format...
I see Bauer have also not exercised the option to re-brand all of their heritage stations in the Big City network as Heat, or some other equivalent Heart-esque product. But I realise that's deviating from the subject a bit.