Originally Posted by
Baby Dragon:
“I just don't understand what some people were watching! They should've gone in with an open mind and not compare everything to the Judy Garland movie.
Danielle wasn't trying to be Judy, she was playing Dorothy her own way! Isn't that what she's suppose to do?
Anyways, I can't wait to see the show again on Friday. Excited to see Danielle rock it!
”
Well there could be some little problems with Danielle's performance. The decision that you have to make is if those bother you or not. Just like The Dark Knight with me. I know it has flaws, but i don't care. For the record i'm sure Danielle was great. I have no doubt about that! I can't judge something i haven't seen. I'm only using what i've read.
And when they say that Danielle was to much Judy Garland, then they are saying that Danielle was too much Dorothy. There is only so much you can change before people don't recognize Dorothy. So that is just nitpicking something, because they don't want to say that she was great.
And we must always remember that Judy Garland is Dorothy. She has been for 72 years. That's something that Danielle will not change. Not in this short amount of time. So it is only natural that you would compare Danielle with her predecessor. We do that with everything. But we should only except criticism if it's just. I haven't seen it so i take both on board. Those that mean i want her to fail? Not at all, but i won't only look at the positive.
Okay, for some reason i started to type a lot. Don't really know where this came from, but it is nothing personal to anyone on this thread.