Before I start, this is not an Apple bashing thread. If that is your aim please move on, we do not need "buy and Android" or "jailbreak" response.
With that out of the way...
The new ios 4.3 is out and now we have the option to set our iphone 4 as a wi-fi hotspot, except most of us don't do we?!
If you are on 3 then you are lucky, I also read T-Mobile are the same, as they allow you to use the feature with no additional bolt on.
I am an o2 customer on an unlimited simplicity tariff. If I have unlimted data why should I have to pay £7.50 a month for data I already have and a feature that I will only use occasionaly. I will use it once in a while, but not 500mb worth and certainly not enough to justify £7.50 a month.
Is it ethical for the networks to charge us to use this feature when we mostly stick within our monthly data allowance? I currently use on average 266mb a month, so even if I was on a capped 500mb plan I would still not exceed my allowance. This means I have used less than half of the minimum I would be allowed on o2 and yet I am still expected to pay for the Bolt On. This just not make sense to me and I'm sure I am not the only one.
Surely it makes more sense for the networks to allow this feature by default with no extra charge, until you exceed your monthly allowance, at which point you will have to pay for more data? If I ever exceeded my data for the month then I would have no qualms about paying the additional fee, but I am disgusted they want the money up front just to unlock the feature and then to cap it again at 500mb.
The same networks do not stop Android phones from enabling this function, so should they be allowed to descriminate against different phone users? In a world where car insurance and pensions etc all have to be equalised and no one can be treated any differently regardless of sex, age, sexuality or race, then can phone companies legally descriminate against people who use one type of phone?
The networks would easily make money if they charge once over the allowance as more people are likely to use the feature and possibly go over their allowance. At the moment I would imagine most of us look at the feature, see if it is free, realise they want to charge us £x to use it and then think "stuff that" and never think about it again.
Apart from moving network, which is something I have no desire to do, is there anything that could be done to shame the networks into dropping such descrimintaiton and taxing iphone users as they see fit. Would this be worthy of an investigation via Ofcom/Oftel or whatever body it is that oversees the networks. Do you think this would be worthy of an e-mail to Watchdog to see if they would look into it.
Or am I just being petty and should just put up and shut up?
I would really like to hear what all of you DS posters think (as requested sensible answers only that add to the discussion not diss Apple and their users!!!).
With that out of the way...
The new ios 4.3 is out and now we have the option to set our iphone 4 as a wi-fi hotspot, except most of us don't do we?!
If you are on 3 then you are lucky, I also read T-Mobile are the same, as they allow you to use the feature with no additional bolt on.
I am an o2 customer on an unlimited simplicity tariff. If I have unlimted data why should I have to pay £7.50 a month for data I already have and a feature that I will only use occasionaly. I will use it once in a while, but not 500mb worth and certainly not enough to justify £7.50 a month.
Is it ethical for the networks to charge us to use this feature when we mostly stick within our monthly data allowance? I currently use on average 266mb a month, so even if I was on a capped 500mb plan I would still not exceed my allowance. This means I have used less than half of the minimum I would be allowed on o2 and yet I am still expected to pay for the Bolt On. This just not make sense to me and I'm sure I am not the only one.
Surely it makes more sense for the networks to allow this feature by default with no extra charge, until you exceed your monthly allowance, at which point you will have to pay for more data? If I ever exceeded my data for the month then I would have no qualms about paying the additional fee, but I am disgusted they want the money up front just to unlock the feature and then to cap it again at 500mb.
The same networks do not stop Android phones from enabling this function, so should they be allowed to descriminate against different phone users? In a world where car insurance and pensions etc all have to be equalised and no one can be treated any differently regardless of sex, age, sexuality or race, then can phone companies legally descriminate against people who use one type of phone?
The networks would easily make money if they charge once over the allowance as more people are likely to use the feature and possibly go over their allowance. At the moment I would imagine most of us look at the feature, see if it is free, realise they want to charge us £x to use it and then think "stuff that" and never think about it again.
Apart from moving network, which is something I have no desire to do, is there anything that could be done to shame the networks into dropping such descrimintaiton and taxing iphone users as they see fit. Would this be worthy of an investigation via Ofcom/Oftel or whatever body it is that oversees the networks. Do you think this would be worthy of an e-mail to Watchdog to see if they would look into it.
Or am I just being petty and should just put up and shut up?
I would really like to hear what all of you DS posters think (as requested sensible answers only that add to the discussion not diss Apple and their users!!!).




it will not be free whats the problem, most packages have a limit now whats the problem using it on a phone slowly or a bit faster on a laptop?