Has any UK channel bought The Borgias?
Originally Posted by James J:
“Random thought, why don't the networks push everything back an hour with the clocks?
I think it'd work really well. Just have everything on an hour later. So early evening news at 7pm and 7.30pm on BBC One and ITV1 respectively, then the late bulletin at 11pm.
Emmerdale at 8pm nightly, EE and Corrie in the 9pm slots.
Ratings are getting dismal...”
Or how about this - no soaps during British summer time!
Originally Posted by Dancc:
“Me too. I was shocked by the HSM figure. The previous two films averaged 3 million for BBC One on Friday nights. On a Sunday, a more natural night for films, I expected the third to do close to 2m on Channel 5.
The previous films rated as follows:
High School Musical
3.4 million / 17% share
BBC One 17:55-19:30 29/12/2006
High School Musical 2
2.6 million / 17% share
BBC1 16:05-17:50 21/3/2008
I'm actually not sure what happened for the figure to be as low as 1 million. Maybe Back To The Future II which aired in an almost identical slot on ITV2 dented it somewhat.
Channel 5 might have got better figures if they had aired it over the Easter holiday.”
Although on it's own the 1m figure is half of what I was expecting, when compared with the BBC1 figures (presumably on Bank Holidays or over Christmas/Easter) it didn't do too well there either, so no surprise it flopped.
Did Disney ever continue the franchise - weren't they planning to return to the telemoive format with a new cast?
Originally Posted by
Dancc:
“True Blood pulled similar numbers on FX and still went on to have a relatively successful first series on Channel 4. House I think was another on Hallmark that went onto perform really well for Channel 5. And there are other examples. Even Dexter wasn't doing too badly for ITV, but it was probably more costly than their usual post-news fare. So I disagree. The successful run it's had on pay TV will have little effect on the FTA numbers. Indeed, it may actually help through those that have already seen it recommending it to those that haven't yet.
It may not rate very well, but if it doesn't, it won't be because of the run on little watched FX.
---
click here to play the TV Ratings Prediction Game – new season starts tomorrow, everyone welcome.”
True Blood didn't do that well really after the first couple of weeks - but I agree pay-TV shows at least deserve a shot on free to air, though I think they're better suited to digital channels than the main channel. Fiver and Five USA has pretty much been based around second run content.
Originally Posted by GeorgeS:
“BB is going to be wall to wall on the five network. The clues are in the budget. Out of a total budget of £250m, BB will account for £40m. When you add in the Neighbours, H&A, and CSI comitted cost you will have used up £100m out of the full £250m. Out of the remaining £150m you would allocate probably £10m to news currently, £20m to sports rights, maybe another £15m to films and say £10m to kids and £10m for daytime. Suddenly you are left with £85m for everything else. At best that buys you 170 hours of new programming at £500k an hour so thats about 3 hours per week of primetime content apart from the pre-mentioned.”
£500k an hour - I don't think so - networks are only paying that for high end drama and entertainment, something you don't get on C5. I doubt much of their programming tops £100-£200k an hour.
And not too surprised by the Football League news - the BBC really couldn't justify renewing the Championship rights - the question is whether they'll still be interested in the highlights too.