Originally Posted by grahamlthompson:
“It's fixed, Barry said it was and also that the new boot loader was not required. Both correct so he does know more than a Humax employee. What's the point of this ?”
“It's fixed, Barry said it was and also that the new boot loader was not required. Both correct so he does know more than a Humax employee. What's the point of this ?”
I was only stating that Bob_Cat has always said a bootloader update would be required (not might). The fact it does not was either a genuine error (i.e. Bob_Cat got his facts wrong) or they found a better (still correct) way of fixing it that did not require an update to the boot loader or they fudged it. Regardless of which way they did it as long as it works and doesn't cause any problems elsewhere then we shouldn't really care
If you gave me two statements and said that one statement was from the Chief Technologist at Humax (i.e. Bob_Cat) and the other one was from a non-employee who knows the Humax management (i.e. Barry) I would tend to believe the Chief Technologist statement would be more accurate. In this case it was not and I accept that.




