Originally Posted by
Stefanino:
“OK, maybe I shouldn't have watched this late at night after a couple of beers, but I am still unclear about some aspects of last night's 'cheesy'
drama...
1) Are we meant to believe that a young woman who was bullied at school ends up so memntally unhinged as to become a serial killer exacting barbaric revenge over a period of a few days?
2) Why did she murder two men who were unconnected to the bullying (her hubby and the two-timing spouse who ended up with a maggoty meal)?
3) Why the 'cheese' theme to her modus operandi - cheese, cheese-wire, Sardinian cheese maggots, cheese-prod thingy and cows?
4) Given the above cheese obsession, why did the last attempted murder break the trend (gassed to death in a science lab)?
amd finally....
5) Why was the dog dressed in bandages when all that had happened was that he had swallowed a ring (the ring having been retrieved after nature had taken its course) and what was in fact hidden under the dressing? 
As I said, maybe a sober, more alert viewing would have been better but I'm not prepared to watch it again so would be grateful for any light shone on the above-mentioned points!
”
I'll do my best and I'm sure others will correct me if I'm wrong:
1) Yes.
2) She killed her husband because he went back on the idea that they'd go back to London after six months and she couldn't stand anyone telling her what to do. The other husband - no idea, presumably she thought his wife and him were happy together and she was punishing her by killing him?
3) Her family had run the dairy for generations, so it was part of what she felt was imprisoning her, and she was put in that school because she was one of the children connected to the dairy?
4) I suppose the writer wanted to bring home how she'd been bullied, by recreating trapping her in a cupboard. I suppose the other deaths couldn't be school connected or that would have given everything away. That's why I always prefer it if the solution isn't that the killer is mad, because then none of it has to make sense.
5) I think the idea was that Barnaby wanted to keep the dog with him at all times, so he'd know when the ring 'returned', so he pretended the dog was injured. That is so silly I'm embarrassed to be writing it, but I think that's what they were saying. What Ben and Kate saw when they undid the bandages - no idea, but I'd be grateful if someone else can explain it.
I thought it was OK - I was fooled and thought Maggie Steed had done it. I thought they could have let the man save the woman from being trampled by cows. Sometimes the amount of nasty death gets me down in such a silly show.
I am gutted to learn from here that it was Ben's last story, and that presumably he won't get any kind of send off now. I don't blame the actor for feeling he's done enough - it's a pretty thankless part - but I liked him.