|
||||||||
The new Midsomer Murders with Neil Dudgeon Thread |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1551 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,138
|
Quote:
he wasnt a winco was he he was I thought he was an Air Commodore , not that it really matters .My dad was in the RAF and we moved about every three years and we always moved stations never camps
If there has ever been a more ridiculous Midsomer Murders storyline I have must have missed it. The body that supposedly been buried for 30 years in the shallow grave would have been dug up quite soon after burial by animals. If these latest scripts are the best they can come up with then it's about time they quit before viewers stop watching. |
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#1552 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 2,663
|
Quote:
No the first episode (and still the best) was the Rainbirds who both got murdered I think there were 4 murders in first episode, the Rainbirds saw the first murderer from their window and blackmailed which is why they got killed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1553 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: up the stairs!
Posts: 11,649
|
Quote:
He was Group Captain Jeremy Ford. I agree with others that it's unlikely he would have remained a Group Captain for 30 years without being promoted..
If there has ever been a more ridiculous Midsomer Murders storyline I have must have missed it. The body that supposedly been buried for 30 years in the shallow grave would have been dug up quite soon after burial by animals. If these latest scripts are the best they can come up with then it's about time they quit before viewers stop watching. |
|
|
|
|
|
#1554 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 3,429
|
The fact that the majority of the discussion about the latest episode has been nothing other than complaining about the amount of diversity pretty much explains why it's happening.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1555 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: the land of the hobbit.
Posts: 8,839
|
Quote:
All the budget has been spent on diversity inspectors, they've very little left for anything as trivial as a script/story.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1556 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: up the stairs!
Posts: 11,649
|
Quote:
I am sure i speak for others , i enjoyed the episode, if you thought it daft or not, which you did..i am sure if you stop watching there will be thousands of others still eager to watch.
I see your spore all over the forum and you're frequently telling people what they may or may not do. I was unaware of your appointment to the forum police. Unlike you I wouldn't presume to speak on behalf of others but you fill your boots. The point is, that the "diversity" has been included in a very heavy handed and unnecessary way. For me this was a distraction from the show itself. The show never felt the need to be politically correct in the past and changing it in such a jarring way simply smacks of pandering. There is of course no reason to not include a diverse cast but of course that changes the nature of the show. I do so sincerely hope this post meets with your approval but if by some chance it doesn't *shrug* I don't care. |
|
|
|
|
|
#1557 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: up the stairs!
Posts: 11,649
|
Quote:
The fact that the majority of the discussion about the latest episode has been nothing other than complaining about the amount of diversity pretty much explains why it's happening.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1558 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 3,520
|
I've pretty much given up taking Midsomer Murders as any kind of serious detective series now - it's just a pleasant way of passing 2 hours in the middle of the week and playing spot the star and 'Where have I seen him/her before?'.
There are much worse atrocities on our screens - and 5million plus viewers last night can't all be wrong (unless of course they dozed off and just left it it running, which I've a suspicion I did at one point). With those sorts of viewing figures, ITV aren't going to change it any time soon. |
|
|
|
|
|
#1559 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 15,280
|
Quote:
- it's just a pleasant way of passing 2 hours in the middle of the week and playing spot the star and 'Where have I seen him/her before?'.
I. Corrie rejects.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1560 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Kessingland, Suffolk
Posts: 85,524
|
Quote:
I've pretty much given up taking Midsomer Murders as any kind of serious detective series now - it's just a pleasant way of passing 2 hours in the middle of the week and playing spot the star and 'Where have I seen him/her before?'.
|
|
|
|
|
#1561 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Planet Alan
Posts: 1,632
|
A very disappointing episode.
Poorly written, with too many unexplained gaps and inconsistencies. Presumably the writers for this episode were still on a work experience placement and had no idea how to create, construct and write a realistic, (in TV terms) script. Grudgingly, I have to admit that the only performer with any semblance of credibility was the accursed hound - Sykes. |
|
|
|
|
|
#1562 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: England
Posts: 898
|
I enjoyed it!!!!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1563 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Darlo
Posts: 29,413
|
I didn't not enjoy it I just find the soco constantly belittling nelson a bit cringe making,and as an RAF brat I dislike the bad research
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1564 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,138
|
Quote:
I've pretty much given up taking Midsomer Murders as any kind of serious detective series now - it's just a pleasant way of passing 2 hours in the middle of the week and playing spot the star and 'Where have I seen him/her before?'.
There are much worse atrocities on our screens - and 5million plus viewers last night can't all be wrong (unless of course they dozed off and just left it it running, which I've a suspicion I did at one point). With those sorts of viewing figures, ITV aren't going to change it any time soon. |
|
|
|
|
|
#1565 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: West Midlands
Posts: 2,455
|
Quote:
If you do as I do and record it, then play it back and FF the adverts it's a pleasant way to spend 90 minutes. That's assuming it's an interesting story, unlike last night's..
(Incidentally, if you want laughable implausibility, Judge John Deed is your man.) |
|
|
|
|
|
#1566 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 942
|
The best way I can think of describing this episode is 'unengaging'.
On the diversity front, I'm pretty sure that if there hadn't been the public ruckus over Ted Childs' casting decisions, no one would even notice. |
|
|
|
|
|
#1567 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 942
|
Quote:
He was Group Captain Jeremy Ford. I agree with others that it's unlikely he would have remained a Group Captain for 30 years without being promoted.
Group captain is a very high rank and he would have had to achieve it by the age of 25 as he has clearly not reached retirement age. (The army equivalent would be a 25 y/o colonel.) The idea that such a star would remain at that rank for 30 years and be left running a warehouse is absurd. |
|
|
|
|
|
#1568 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 3,520
|
Quote:
I would say it's unheard of.
Group captain is a very high rank and he would have had to achieve it by the age of 25 as he has clearly not reached retirement age. (The army equivalent would be a 25 y/o colonel.) The idea that such a star would remain at that rank for 30 years and be left running a warehouse is absurd. ![]() ![]()
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1569 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Darlo
Posts: 29,413
|
Quote:
It's Midsomer Murders - you expect everything to be absurd! I find it (quite) funny that the inconsistencies about the rank of the RAF officer, is it a 'base' or a 'station' questions seem to be generating more disbelief than the idea of UFOs in the first place
![]() ![]() ![]()
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1570 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 942
|
Quote:
It's Midsomer Murders - you expect everything to be absurd!
In MSM, we suspend disbelief about most aspects of police procedure but that does not mean that the writers get a free pass to be lazy with all other aspects of reality. We don't expect Nelson to drive around in a Rolls Royce! The group captain thing was particularly egregious because (for anyone with even a minimal grasp of RAF workings) it was completely confusing when they first mentioned the group captain from the eighties; we knew it (in reality) couldn't be the same person so we missed dialogue whilst trying to make sense of what we'd heard - "did I hear that right / was it his father ..." Quote:
I find it (quite) funny that the inconsistencies about the rank of the RAF officer, is it a 'base' or a 'station' questions seem to be generating more disbelief than the idea of UFOs in the first place )
But it wasn't about UFO's, was it?And no one is concerned that the physics behind the craft, as shown, could not work - that sort of detail - provided it's not too ridiculous - isn't really relevant. |
|
|
|
|
|
#1571 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 3,520
|
Quote:
but it was obvious the ufo was bollocks
![]() ![]()
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1572 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Darlo
Posts: 29,413
|
Quote:
Was it - I thought it was about the most realistic thing I'd seen in a Midsomer plot for years....
![]() ![]()
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1573 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 3,520
|
Quote:
As someone on twitter said , I really miss the days when Rchard Briars was a mad vicar and all the plots were grudges from three centuries ago
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#1574 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 3,520
|
Quote:
I think this is a mistake a lot of people (including quiet a few writers) make. Just because something contains certain elements of unrealism does not mean you have carte blanche to be careless about other aspects of a story.
In MSM, we suspend disbelief about most aspects of police procedure but that does not mean that the writers get a free pass to be lazy with all other aspects of reality. We don't expect Nelson to drive around in a Rolls Royce! The group captain thing was particularly egregious because (for anyone with even a minimal grasp of RAF workings) it was completely confusing when they first mentioned the group captain from the eighties; we knew it (in reality) couldn't be the same person so we missed dialogue whilst trying to make sense of what we'd heard - "did I hear that right / was it his father ..." But it wasn't about UFO's, was it? And no one is concerned that the physics behind the craft, as shown, could not work - that sort of detail - provided it's not too ridiculous - isn't really relevant. |
|
|
|
|
|
#1575 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: up the stairs!
Posts: 11,649
|
Quote:
I guess I can understand that - we all know UFOs aren't real, so we don't expect any semblance of reality, but yes, they should at least try for some modicum of reality for issues like the rank of the group captain and so on.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 13:35.





