Originally Posted by Pacman 2011:
“Same responses, thread is getting boring now.”
“Same responses, thread is getting boring now.”
why? because the responses arnt going your way?
then leave it! you dont have to return here with your ageist comments.
Oasis vs The Beatles vs Michael Jackson vs Elvis
6 of 13
why? because the responses arnt going your way?
then leave it! you dont have to return here with your ageist comments.
Originally Posted by mushymanrob:
“why? because the responses arnt going your way?
then leave it! you dont have to return here with your ageist comments.”
“why? because the responses arnt going your way?
then leave it! you dont have to return here with your ageist comments.”
My thread... so you go away, acting tough behind your internet... pathetic.
Originally Posted by Pacman 2011:
“My thread... so you go away, acting tough behind your internet... pathetic.”
“My thread... so you go away, acting tough behind your internet... pathetic.”
then why moan?...
bloody children... :yawn:
Originally Posted by BluseyLou:
“LOL !! I'm under 35 that is not old atall
Ok so meand the hundreds of thousands who do that tour old and young are odd ...whatever ............
”
“LOL !! I'm under 35 that is not old atall
Ok so meand the hundreds of thousands who do that tour old and young are odd ...whatever ............
”
I'm 16, massive Beatles fan, I went to see Paul McCartney live in the Millennium Stadium last year, and I'd see John and George if they were still alive.
Originally Posted by CABLEDUDE:
“I'm 16, massive Beatles fan, I went to see Paul McCartney live in the Millennium Stadium last year, and I'd see John and George if they were still alive.”
“I'm 16, massive Beatles fan, I went to see Paul McCartney live in the Millennium Stadium last year, and I'd see John and George if they were still alive.
”
Ringo's touring later this year - got your ticket??
Originally Posted by Taboo:
“LOL same old same old....with the same old people again
MJ
The Beatles
Elvis:yawn:
Oasis:yawn:”
“LOL same old same old....with the same old people again
MJ
The Beatles
Elvis:yawn:
Oasis:yawn:”
predictable
if you care to read the thread youll see that most people dont rate your beloved mj, (along with oasis).. there have been some damning comments from people who didnt take part in any previous debate about mj... theres only me, and now you, so your comment is as relevant to you as it is me.
Originally Posted by CABLEDUDE:
“I'm 16, massive Beatles fan, I went to see Paul McCartney live in the Millennium Stadium last year, and I'd see John and George if they were still alive.”
“I'm 16, massive Beatles fan, I went to see Paul McCartney live in the Millennium Stadium last year, and I'd see John and George if they were still alive.
”
You have great taste ~ and see young or old people love The Beatles
.
Originally Posted by Gaditano:
“Ringo's touring later this year - got your ticket??”
“Ringo's touring later this year - got your ticket??”
I have got my ticket to see Ringo in Manchester, Can't wait, this will be my 2nd time for Ringo, I have seen Paul 8 times and George once at the Royal Albert Hall.
My daughter who is 12 is going with me to see Ringo, She loves The Beatles she has good taste in music unlike her school friends.
Originally Posted by deedee1962:
“I have got my ticket to see Ringo in Manchester, Can't wait, this will be my 2nd time for Ringo, I have seen Paul 8 times and George once at the Royal Albert Hall.
My daughter who is 12 is going with me to see Ringo, She loves The Beatles she has good taste in music unlike her school friends.”
“I have got my ticket to see Ringo in Manchester, Can't wait, this will be my 2nd time for Ringo, I have seen Paul 8 times and George once at the Royal Albert Hall.
My daughter who is 12 is going with me to see Ringo, She loves The Beatles she has good taste in music unlike her school friends.”
I hope you don't mind me asking but where did you buy your tickets ? ~ I live in London and would love to go see him if he is doing shows here .
I can drag my mum along as she is 'of' early Beatles era
.
Originally Posted by BluseyLou:
“I hope you don't mind me asking but where did you buy your tickets ? ~ I live in London and would love to go see him if he is doing shows here .
I can drag my mum along as she is 'of' early Beatles era .”
“I hope you don't mind me asking but where did you buy your tickets ? ~ I live in London and would love to go see him if he is doing shows here .
I can drag my mum along as she is 'of' early Beatles era
.”
He's doing a show at Hampton court palace in the summer.
http://www.hamptoncourtpalacefestival.com/artists
Originally Posted by BluseyLou:
“I hope you don't mind me asking but where did you buy your tickets ? ~ I live in London and would love to go see him if he is doing shows here .
I can drag my mum along as she is 'of' early Beatles era .”
“I hope you don't mind me asking but where did you buy your tickets ? ~ I live in London and would love to go see him if he is doing shows here .
I can drag my mum along as she is 'of' early Beatles era
.”
If you go to The website of the venue you want to go to I think you can purchace them on line as that is how I got mine, Ticketmaster should have them though as they sent out the tickets to me. Hope you can get some
all details are on Ringo's official site.
Originally Posted by Taboo:
“He's doing a show at Hampton court palace in the summer.
http://www.hamptoncourtpalacefestival.com/artists”
“He's doing a show at Hampton court palace in the summer.
http://www.hamptoncourtpalacefestival.com/artists”
Originally Posted by deedee1962:
“If you go to The website of the venue you want to go to I think you can purchace them on line as that is how I got mine, Ticketmaster should have them though as they sent out the tickets to me. Hope you can get some all details are on Ringo's official site.”
“If you go to The website of the venue you want to go to I think you can purchace them on line as that is how I got mine, Ticketmaster should have them though as they sent out the tickets to me. Hope you can get some
all details are on Ringo's official site.”
Thank You ,I will look into getting tickets
.
Originally Posted by Gaditano:
“Ringo's touring later this year - got your ticket??”
“Ringo's touring later this year - got your ticket??”
Alas no, we were going to go to the show in Birmingham, but my mother's pregnant and is dragging us all to see a show in the West End instead.
Originally Posted by Pacman 2011:
“What is your personal opinion and what is facts?
Who really was or is the best!?”
“What is your personal opinion and what is facts?
Who really was or is the best!?”
ok to answer the original question posed...
personally:-
beatles
oasis
elvis
jackson
factually:-
beatles
elvis
jacko
oasis.
Originally Posted by CABLEDUDE:
“I'm 16, massive Beatles fan, I went to see Paul McCartney live in the Millennium Stadium last year, and I'd see John and George if they were still alive.”
“I'm 16, massive Beatles fan, I went to see Paul McCartney live in the Millennium Stadium last year, and I'd see John and George if they were still alive.
”
I'm 15, massive Beatles fan, I went to see Paul McCartney live in Dublin last year. I also would love to see John and George.
YOUNG PEOPLE LIKE THEM TOO - DON'T STEREOTYPE FANBASES.
Originally Posted by mushymanrob:
“you made a stupid comment, hardly an observation, and when it was proven to be inaccurate (your thinly disguised hint that the poster might be racist) you make another! how tf you can call him 'wrong' and 'ignorant' when you were comprehensively proven wrong is quite shocking... (or is your 'ignorant' accusation a nod to jacko?...lol
the quietness of jacko fans here is deafening... together they reassure one abnother that jacko is THE only thing in music, that he changed everything, and that the world either agrees or is 'ignorant'... yet here his popularity is less then that beatles tribute act (oasis). i guess they dont like the truth.”
“you made a stupid comment, hardly an observation, and when it was proven to be inaccurate (your thinly disguised hint that the poster might be racist) you make another! how tf you can call him 'wrong' and 'ignorant' when you were comprehensively proven wrong is quite shocking... (or is your 'ignorant' accusation a nod to jacko?...lol
the quietness of jacko fans here is deafening... together they reassure one abnother that jacko is THE only thing in music, that he changed everything, and that the world either agrees or is 'ignorant'... yet here his popularity is less then that beatles tribute act (oasis). i guess they dont like the truth.”
You can't be that dense. Do you actually think a few people dismissing Michael Jackson (as if their opinion or yours has any sort of merit) on a little known music forum is a measure of his popularity and significance. His significance was clearly documented during his life and spectacularly witnessed when he died. I guess it really irritated you the unprecedented love and tributes he received. From people who weren't even fans of his. They acknowledged him.
His fans do not require reassurance of his importance. Anyone with a bit of intelligence and awareness to reality knows.
I don't know when 'Jacko fans' declared him the only thing in music and that he changed everything, or how you know they've not missed this very important thread that conclusively decided Oasis were better and have remained quiet out of disillusion and shame. That 'truth' must have shattered them.
Originally Posted by Menk:
“I do think the odd one out on the list is Elvis though as he was a performer and not a song-writer. To me this makes it difficult to compare him to the others, like comparing Bach, Mozart, Beethoven and Pavarotti.”
“I do think the odd one out on the list is Elvis though as he was a performer and not a song-writer. To me this makes it difficult to compare him to the others, like comparing Bach, Mozart, Beethoven and Pavarotti.”
erm just to correct this slightly
Bach, Mozart, Pavarotti and Mantovani
Mantovani re-arranger of other peoples work in a style that is generally bland
= Oasis
Originally Posted by masterquan:
“You can't be that dense. Do you actually think a few people dismissing Michael Jackson (as if their opinion or yours has any sort of merit) on a little known music forum is a measure of his popularity and significance. His significance was clearly documented during his life and spectacularly witnessed when he died. I guess it really irritated you the unprecedented love and tributes he received. From people who weren't even fans of his. They acknowledged him.
His fans do not require reassurance of his importance. Anyone with a bit of intelligence and awareness to reality knows.
I don't know when 'Jacko fans' declared him the only thing in music and that he changed everything, or how you know they've not missed this very important thread that conclusively decided Oasis were better and have remained quiet out of disillusion and shame. That 'truth' must have shattered them.”
“You can't be that dense. Do you actually think a few people dismissing Michael Jackson (as if their opinion or yours has any sort of merit) on a little known music forum is a measure of his popularity and significance. His significance was clearly documented during his life and spectacularly witnessed when he died. I guess it really irritated you the unprecedented love and tributes he received. From people who weren't even fans of his. They acknowledged him.
His fans do not require reassurance of his importance. Anyone with a bit of intelligence and awareness to reality knows.
I don't know when 'Jacko fans' declared him the only thing in music and that he changed everything, or how you know they've not missed this very important thread that conclusively decided Oasis were better and have remained quiet out of disillusion and shame. That 'truth' must have shattered them.”
ahhh... a 'believer'...
why shouldnt it be a measure of his popularity? he was pitted against two of the greatest forces ever in pop music history so his third place not only was expected but a true depiction in the real world of how he is perceived. it is no disgrace comming behind elvis and the beatles, and does not diminish his acheivements....they just were not as big as elvis nor the beatles. if you are suggesting that jacko is/was bigger then them then you are on seriously dodgy ground, because no one in the real world (is not a devotee of jacko) would rank him higher.
i dont think anyone seriously thinks that oasis are better then jacko... although they might prefer them on a personal level... like me...i prefer oasis, but i wouldnt be as daft as to think their impact on the music world (as opposed to a corner of the uk) is bigger then jackos..
so mr hero, galloping on his crusaic white steed to the defense of your god... id suggest you actually read the thread first before going to the trouble of composing a totally un necessary response, because if you truely believe that jacko has had more impact on the music world then elvis or the beatles then you are madly deluded.
Originally Posted by M. Tourette:
“erm just to correct this slightly
Bach, Mozart, Pavarotti and Mantovani
Mantovani re-arranger of other peoples work in a style that is generally bland
= Oasis”
“erm just to correct this slightly
Bach, Mozart, Pavarotti and Mantovani
Mantovani re-arranger of other peoples work in a style that is generally bland
= Oasis”
Ooh harsh!
My order of preference from best to worst:
Beatles
Michael Jackson
Elvis
...
...
...
...
Oasis (don't deserve to be put in the same company)
Beatles
Michael Jackson
Elvis
...
...
...
...
Oasis (don't deserve to be put in the same company)
Originally Posted by mushymanrob:
“ahhh... a 'believer'...
why shouldnt it be a measure of his popularity? he was pitted against two of the greatest forces ever in pop music history so his third place not only was expected but a true depiction in the real world of how he is perceived. it is no disgrace comming behind elvis and the beatles, and does not diminish his acheivements....they just were not as big as elvis nor the beatles. if you are suggesting that jacko is/was bigger then them then you are on seriously dodgy ground, because no one in the real world (is not a devotee of jacko) would rank him higher.
i dont think anyone seriously thinks that oasis are better then jacko... although they might prefer them on a personal level... like me...i prefer oasis, but i wouldnt be as daft as to think their impact on the music world (as opposed to a corner of the uk) is bigger then jackos..
so mr hero, galloping on his crusaic white steed to the defense of your god... id suggest you actually read the thread first before going to the trouble of composing a totally un necessary response, because if you truely believe that jacko has had more impact on the music world then elvis or the beatles then you are madly deluded.”
“ahhh... a 'believer'...
why shouldnt it be a measure of his popularity? he was pitted against two of the greatest forces ever in pop music history so his third place not only was expected but a true depiction in the real world of how he is perceived. it is no disgrace comming behind elvis and the beatles, and does not diminish his acheivements....they just were not as big as elvis nor the beatles. if you are suggesting that jacko is/was bigger then them then you are on seriously dodgy ground, because no one in the real world (is not a devotee of jacko) would rank him higher.
i dont think anyone seriously thinks that oasis are better then jacko... although they might prefer them on a personal level... like me...i prefer oasis, but i wouldnt be as daft as to think their impact on the music world (as opposed to a corner of the uk) is bigger then jackos..
so mr hero, galloping on his crusaic white steed to the defense of your god... id suggest you actually read the thread first before going to the trouble of composing a totally un necessary response, because if you truely believe that jacko has had more impact on the music world then elvis or the beatles then you are madly deluded.
”
'Elvis was bigger than Michael Jackson'. No fact included.
Could have just said that, left out the petty remarks and not waste time replying to things I didn't say. Never mentioned the Beatles in this thread. I respect them. Never called Michael Jackson a God.
Don't know what a 'believer' is. Meant as a self satisfying insult I guess.
Don't care.
Michael jackson is the most famous and iconic popular artist ever.
Easy to agree with, an accepted truth. Refuse to acknowledge it doesn't change anything does it you old fart.
His voice, videos, songs, dances and outfits are the most recognised ever in popular music. Fact.
Cleary he was more talented than Elvis and had a better musical output throught his careear.
He has of two of the greatest albums ever made and the biggest selling album by a long way.
I don't think I've ever seen an Elvis Album on best lists
Michael Jackson was bigger, badder and better than Elvis
Now unless you want to come at me with some facts instead of self satisfied opinions and assumptions lets end this here.
Originally Posted by masterquan:
“'Elvis was bigger than Michael Jackson'. No fact included.
Could have just said that, left out the petty remarks and not waste time replying to things I didn't say. Never mentioned the Beatles in this thread. I respect them. Never called Michael Jackson a God.
Don't know what a 'believer' is. Meant as a self satisfying insult I guess.
Don't care.
Michael jackson is the most famous and iconic popular artist ever.
Easy to agree with, an accepted truth. Refuse to acknowledge it doesn't change anything does it you old fart.
His voice, videos, songs, dances and outfits are the most recognised ever in popular music. Fact.
Cleary he was more talented than Elvis and had a better musical output throught his careear.
He has of two of the greatest albums ever made and the biggest selling album by a long way.
I don't think I've ever seen an Elvis Album on best lists
Michael Jackson was bigger, badder and better than Elvis
Now unless you want to come at me with some facts instead of self satisfied opinions and assumptions lets end this here.”
“'Elvis was bigger than Michael Jackson'. No fact included.
Could have just said that, left out the petty remarks and not waste time replying to things I didn't say. Never mentioned the Beatles in this thread. I respect them. Never called Michael Jackson a God.
Don't know what a 'believer' is. Meant as a self satisfying insult I guess.
Don't care.
Michael jackson is the most famous and iconic popular artist ever.
Easy to agree with, an accepted truth. Refuse to acknowledge it doesn't change anything does it you old fart.
His voice, videos, songs, dances and outfits are the most recognised ever in popular music. Fact.
Cleary he was more talented than Elvis and had a better musical output throught his careear.
He has of two of the greatest albums ever made and the biggest selling album by a long way.
I don't think I've ever seen an Elvis Album on best lists
Michael Jackson was bigger, badder and better than Elvis
Now unless you want to come at me with some facts instead of self satisfied opinions and assumptions lets end this here.
”
Self-Satisfied Opinions & Assumptions?
The Irony.
Your post is just one opinion from one person. It doesn't make you right in any way.
6 of 13
