• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • Doctor Who
The Hand of Fear to be repeated on BBC4
<<
<
2 of 4
>>
>
Ethel_Fred
09-05-2011
"It's a quarry"
"Dressed like Andy Pandy"

TheWayItIs
09-05-2011
Originally Posted by M@nterik:
“So where is the tribute to Nick Courtney ?

Sladen, whose career nose dived from 1980 onwards gets a tribute.”

Would you say that Nick Courtney's career went onwards and upwards from 1980 and for decades afterwards?
Lowri
09-05-2011
Nice to see a quarry being used as a quarry!
I was worried that she had killed the lab guy and that wouldn't have been like SJS at all!

Did anyone else notice that when the nuclear boss guy was talking on the tannoy, there was a fly walking over his forehead?
cathrin
09-05-2011
Great to see this again. Is anyone watching with their kids? What do they make of it? It must seem quite strange for children who have been raised on today's Who (and seeing SJ as a young girl must seem weird too).
k9fan
09-05-2011
Eldrad must live!

Love it.

Must go and look up Glyn Houston now.
Straker
09-05-2011
Originally Posted by M@nterik:
“Sladen, whose career nose dived from 1980 onwards gets a tribute.”


Lis chose to back away from acting to be a full-time mum raising her daughter and seeing as she only recently died I think your tone is a little disrespectful.
daveyboy7472
09-05-2011
Didn't watch it on BBC4 tonight, but I know this story is a good one and it's fascinating to read the views of people who haven't seen much or no Classic Who.

I agree it was nice to see a quarry being a quarry for once and The Doctor indulging in a bit of Cricket many year before Doc 5. I thought Lis Sladen put in a superb performance as the possessed Sarah and it was a really good opening first episode and an unusual way of introducing the regulars into it.
Lowri
09-05-2011
Originally Posted by cathrin:
“It must seem quite strange for children who have been raised on today's Who (and seeing SJ as a young girl must seem weird too).”

It's quite strange for me and although I wasn't a child when new who started, I'm too young to have caught the classic series the first time around so I've only seen a few of them. I must admit I did have a little giggle at the wobbly set and the poorly superimposed hand!
I think a child might find it even less strange, I know when I was younger I would watch older programmes and I can't remember noticing big differences in the set and FX quality but I suppose 90's tv looks pretty bad compared to today's HD.
I hope you understand that I'm only picking on it in an affectionate way! It's a great story and I'm looking forward to the final parts tomorrow
indigow
09-05-2011
my four year old got to stay up to watch it as a treat and he really enjoyed it - loves the classic music - but he was confused, kept asking when the ood was coming on as it was at the end of the ep 4 trailer for the new series

this is the second classic story he's watched, he absolutely loved the five doctors

nice seeing lis sladen as a young sarah, great chemistry between her and tom
Ethel_Fred
09-05-2011
What was noticeable - apart from the lousy music - was how much of the action was NOT centred on the main characters. There were even long periods when neither were on-screen
Granny McSmith
09-05-2011
Originally Posted by M@nterik:
“So where is the tribute to Nick Courtney ?

Why not show Zygons as a tribute to them both.

The Moffatt series is happy to ignore the death of the legend, Courtney, now BBC4 is doing the same.

Sladen, whose career nose dived from 1980 onwards gets a tribute.”

I think the difference is that Lis was the main character in a current Children's BBC serial, and was filming for that serial at the time of her death.

I know "The Brig" had appeared in SJA, but only as a one off.

However, I agree that a classic episode they were both in would have been a better choice. I suppose they chose HoF because it was Lis's last DW until School reunion.

(Not counting the K9 thing!)
Lowri
09-05-2011
Originally Posted by Straker:
“Lis chose to back away from acting to be a full-time mum raising her daughter and seeing as she only recently died I think your tone is a little disrespectful.”

I think it's more than a little disrespectful. There's no need to say that about anyone, alive or dead. You could see from the responses on this forum that her death affected many people, even those who have only watched a couple of DW/SJA episodes in passing.
The loss of Nick Courtney is also terrible and I agree it deserves some sort of tribute but I can understand why the untimely and sudden passing of an actor who was still regularly on television would get more attention.

Besides, it is quite possible to mourn the loss of a fine actor without an official tribute. Fans will always feel grief over a death without a reminder of the past. The huge sum of money raised in Nick and Lis' name for charity is a better tribute than any tape the BBC thought they had a duty to play. (Although I did enjoy their choice very much )
lach doch mal
09-05-2011
Originally Posted by Lowri:
“I think it's more than a little disrespectful. There's no need to say that about anyone, alive or dead. You could see from the responses on this forum that her death affected many people, even those who have only watched a couple of DW/SJA episodes in passing.
The loss of Nick Courtney is also terrible and I agree it deserves some sort of tribute but I can understand why the untimely and sudden passing of an actor who was still regularly on television would get more attention.

Besides, it is quite possible to mourn the loss of a fine actor without an official tribute. Fans will always feel grief over a death without a reminder of the past. The huge sum of money raised in Nick and Lis' name for charity is a better tribute than any tape the BBC thought they had a duty to play. (Although I did enjoy their choice very much )”

I agree, it's not a problem to question why there was not a tribute for Nick without having a dig at Elisabeth Sladen. I'm still very sad when I see her and realise that she was far too young.
WelshNige
09-05-2011
Originally Posted by M@nterik:
“So where is the tribute to Nick Courtney ?

Why not show Zygons as a tribute to them both.

The Moffatt series is happy to ignore the death of the legend, Courtney, now BBC4 is doing the same.

Sladen, whose career nose dived from 1980 onwards gets a tribute.”

First part of the post I agree with.

Last sentence totally uncalled for.
DJGM
09-05-2011
Originally Posted by DJGM:
“. . . The Hand of Fear is coming to BBC iPlayer after it's aired on BBC Four,
despite what I feared might happen regarding the rights issues. Looks like
they've actually got all the necessary rights issues sorted out for this one!
”

Or ... it turns out that it's now not available to download or view on BBC iPlayer after all, but apparently
according to the redirected page from my earlier link, it can be viewed on selected mobile devices.

Quote:
“AVAILABILITY:

Sorry, this programme is not available to watch again here but is currently
available on these devices: Selected wi-fi/3G enabled mobile phones.
”

tonysidaway
10-05-2011
Whenever I go back to one of these older episodes what strikes me most is the sedate pacing. A four-parter gave the writer plenty of time. On the other hand the 45 minute episodes of the modern series produces, I think anyway, a much tighter script. I think the advent of video recording and then view on demand changed the way television is watched and also the way it is written. The writer of popular drama now knows that it will be watched many times by the most dedicated viewers, and this enables much denser, more cryptic storytelling.
M@nterik
10-05-2011
Originally Posted by Straker:
“Lis chose to back away from acting to be a full-time mum raising her daughter and seeing as she only recently died I think your tone is a little disrespectful.”

Well she did also struggle to get work. She did not do too badly on leaving Who but come 1980 really struggled.

It was one of the reasons she refused to appear at UK conventions (although happy to go to the more lucrative American ones).

I'm not being disrespectful, simply pointing something out.
lach doch mal
10-05-2011
Originally Posted by M@nterik:
“Well she did also struggle to get work. She did not do too badly on leaving Who but come 1980 really struggled.

It was one of the reasons she refused to appear at UK conventions (although happy to go to the more lucrative American ones).

I'm not being disrespectful, simply pointing something out.”

But your point seemed to be that she didn't deserve a tribute, because her career might not be on a flying high in the 1980's. Who cares? Even if she had not reappared on our screens, it's nice to see the BBC paying tribute.

It would have been nice to have a tribute for Nick as well, and that's what was really wrong.
k9fan
10-05-2011
Even though modern programmes have different special effects, I still found the hand moving by itself scary!
Jepson
10-05-2011
Originally Posted by Lowri:
“I must admit I did have a little giggle at the wobbly set and the poorly superimposed hand!”

The custom sets were the usual wobbly ones but I noticed that a lot of the episodes shown took place in a real nuclear power station.

Obviously one that had not yet been commissioned.

It was weird watching her walk between the turbines/generating sets in silence.
lach doch mal
10-05-2011
Originally Posted by k9fan:
“Even though modern programmes have different special effects, I still found the hand moving by itself scary! ”

Me too. Quite atmospheric as well.
Jepson
10-05-2011
Originally Posted by M@nterik:
“Well she did also struggle to get work. She did not do too badly on leaving Who but come 1980 really struggled.”

Do you have any credible evidence for that or are you just making it up?

By all appearances she worked until 1985 when her daughter was born at which time she decided to devote her time to bringing up the child.

Quote:
“It was one of the reasons she refused to appear at UK conventions (although happy to go to the more lucrative American ones).”

The reason she gave up UK conventions was because she thought it would be discourteous to the actors that followed her as companions in Doctor Who. She continued to attend foreign conventions because the programmes she appeared in were still being shown abroad.

Quote:
“I'm not being disrespectful, simply pointing something out.”

Except that you seem to be 'pointing out' things that are not backed up by available sources and appear picked to show her in an unfavourable light. i.e. 'struggled to find work' as opposed to concentrating on bringing up a young child and the implication of mercenary motives rather than simple consideration for others.
k9fan
10-05-2011
Quote:
Originally Posted by k9fan
Even though modern programmes have different special effects, I still found the hand moving by itself scary!
Originally Posted by lach doch mal:
“Me too. Quite atmospheric as well. ”

Granny McSmith
10-05-2011
Originally Posted by tonysidaway:
“Whenever I go back to one of these older episodes what strikes me most is the sedate pacing. .”

I know! Then they just wakled along corridors. Nowadays they run! Fast!
Ja88ed
10-05-2011
Originally Posted by DJGM:
“Or ... it turns out that it's now not available to download or view on BBC iPlayer after all, but apparently according to the redirected page from my earlier link, it can be viewed on selected mobile devices.

”

I believe there are "licensing" issues that prevent some things they sell on DVD being shown on iPlayer
<<
<
2 of 4
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map