• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • Doctor Who
Schroedinger's baby
<<
<
2 of 2
>>
>
tonysidaway
04-05-2011
Originally Posted by MissTinkerbell:
“When I was pregnant with my eldest I was almost 6 months before I started showing and know plenty of people who weren't showing any signs of pregnancy at 3 months.”

Also it seems the foetal heartbeat may not be easily detectable by stethoscope before about 20 weeks, so if the pregnancy is in its early stages even nurse Rory could have failed to detect it.

My hypothesis isn't looking very healthy at this stage. Still-born more like.
tonysidaway
07-05-2011
Is anybody else having second thoughts about this? I think the scene at the end of the third episode is more consistent with my original impression that the pregnancy scan is unable to produce a consistent result. The reason why is another question, but at least I now find myself unpersuaded by the idea that the oscillation is simply the way the display normally works.
Boom Head Shot
07-05-2011
Amy will probably end up having time twins.

One baby human.

One baby human-timelord.

Amy will turn out to be the Doctor's mother.
Joanne1938
07-05-2011
There's a look Amy gives him at the end of "Day of the Moon", She's lying, she's pregnant and knows it and is afraid he will know it. The scanner can't remember thre baby when it looks away from it because the silents are trying to protect it for themselves. Who needs a few million humans when you can have a Time Lord baby. After the orphanage they know who the mother is too. The reason the Doctor is so concerned is the interest the silents have paid in Amy's baby, and why she would tell him and not Rory. Good question??
tonysidaway
08-05-2011
I'm still fond of the alternate interpretation of "what he must know, what he must never know." Wouldn't it be an interesting problem for the Doctor if he becomes aware that knowledge of whether Amy is pregnant will lead him into a chain of actions and events that will affect the state of the pregnancy!
Listentome
08-05-2011
Originally Posted by CAMERA OBSCURA:
“The oscillation was whilst the scanner was scanning. The camera then cuts to the Doctor's face, we then hear a 'beep' to suggest that that scanner has finished. So only the Doctor knows the result and not us the viewer.

I really don't think the scanner was flipping between positive/negative because there was no baby or there was something 'wrong' but it was simply starting its scanning process when we saw it on screen for ourselves.

So imo the positive/negative oscillation wasn't the result but the actual scanning process
”

But now we have seen it still oscilating in Curse of the Black Spot. So I assume it is not just to do with the scanning.
justine01
08-05-2011
Considering that the TARDIS is doing the scan, it is obvious to me that the undecided outcome is stemming from alternative timelines not decided yet.

In one, Amy is pregnant, in another, she's not. But which timeline will become the "real" (instead of the alternative) one is still in the flux.

Easy really. And I am really curious to see where each of these timelines lead (which we are probably going to find out throughout the series ).
johnnysaucepn
08-05-2011
Timelines, possibly. But I'm leaning towards the preponderances of pocket universes in these episodes.
<<
<
2 of 2
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map