Was just in the middle of rant-type of post when the thread changed. Fortunately (or unfortunately,whatever!) I managed to save it:
Quote:
“it was only a couple of nights ago a well respected and long term poster was basically told to stick to the jjat by 2 posters”
OK so that happened and it shouldn't. After the OK interview, I posted something critical of Josie, as did some others, and there were posts suggesting we should go to the JJAT. I have posted in the JJAT and I've had some enjoyable exchanges over there.
However, I've been on this thread over the last couple fo days and I am absolutely certain that the overhwelming ambience is of support for them both. We know nothing about the truth of rumours and there is some apprehension that the truth may not show one or the other of them in a favourable light, but we don't know the truth so have to reserve judgment.
Yes it would be unfair if there was unbridled criticism of John on here and none of Josie, but that is not the case. Hell, if I could be bothered I would go through the posts and compile statistical evidence, but I can't.
I've even posted a few posts this morning saying that I hope Josie doesn't do an interview which is uncomplimentary to John and no one has got back to me and said I should move on. I wouldn't anyway, as it is only the mods who should do this.
I've been on here alot today and most of your posts seem to have been about your perception of bias. Maybe if those posts were used to express your support for John then the balance would be redressed.
The way things are at the moment, there are bound to be positve and negative feelings flying around, so it would be nice if everyone could be tolerant of each other and find it in their hearts to be kind to both John and Josie