|
||||||||
Do you think being so soon after the last series will spoil it? |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Norn Iron
Posts: 1,177
|
Do you think being so soon after the last series will spoil it?
I know the last series was delayed because of the election, but it only seems like five minutes since it finished and we're off again. Do you think that, and the fact that it seems to be the same old bunch of thick wannabees with very little change to the formula, except the different prize, will make it feel like it is starting to go a bit stale?
One change I would like to see is that the first task should be an individual one. I know the logistics of mentoring and filming it might be difficult but I think it would be fairer. They are given an amount of money and told to make as much as they can from it and the assessor gives them marks out of ten for common sense, people skills, ingenuity etc and the people with the lowest score and losing the most money are fired. It would bring a bit of variety and sort the wheat from the chaff, but of course they won't do that, because the chaff is the entertainment! |
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 98,141
|
The earlier spring series have tended to start in February-March and run through to June so this one is 'late' in starting from that point of view. You're right though it seems hardly any time at all since the last series ended.
I personally don't know really for how long they can keep the show going and am very ambivalent about the 'new prize' on offer to the eventual winner as well.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 6,463
|
See I find it really suprising that the last series finished just before Christmas. For me it feels like ages since the Apprentice has been on and Stella, Chris, Stuart et al are a distant memory.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 7,780
|
The format was exhausted during Series 4. They repeat the same tropes and "journeys" year on year and they're resorting to obvious scripting of events (and even of entire personalities, eg. Stuart Baggs) for fear they won't have the levels of drama to match up with the previous series.
It doesn't feel like there's anywhere to go from here. Much like X Factor, BGT and Big Brother it has outstayed its welcome. (Judging from the audition VTs on the website we're in for another batch of objectionable pretend-egoists. Susan was the only one not immediately repellant, imo.) |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 4,283
|
Quote:
The format was exhausted during Series 4. They repeat the same tropes and "journeys" year on year and they're resorting to obvious scripting of events (and even of entire personalities, eg. Stuart Baggs) for fear they won't have the levels of drama to match up with the previous series.
![]() I think that the format was given new life in series 5 and I hope that the upcoming series will be at least as good as last year´s series (and not resort to the villainy of series 4 and to a lesser extent series 3). Quote:
It doesn't feel like there's anywhere to go from here. Much like X Factor, BGT and Big Brother it has outstayed its welcome.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 13,496
|
I thought there was going to be a junior apprentice first
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: London
Posts: 7,314
|
I think the bigger threat of spoiling the show is that almost all the tasks now seem to be retail. Sell the most items or one of you gets fired.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Nottingham, UK
Posts: 11,878
|
I don't think it's too soon. Any more than the previous series was too soon after Junior.
I watched the US Apprentice, so for me it's even more recent. I hope they don't have too much emphasis on selling or buying, and I'd like to see more variety in the tasks generally. However, changing the prize is potentially a big change in itself. For the US show they made a lot of changes, which ruined it. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Up the creak without a paddle
Posts: 5,542
|
Quote:
I don't think it's too soon. Any more than the previous series was too soon after Junior.
I watched the US Apprentice, so for me it's even more recent. I hope they don't have too much emphasis on selling or buying, and I'd like to see more variety in the tasks generally. However, changing the prize is potentially a big change in itself. For the US show they made a lot of changes, which ruined it. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Nottingham
Posts: 11,473
|
Quote:
I agree, i've said on another thread there should be more emphasis on how a teams run, not just based on who makes more profits ecc. Theres more to being an Apprentice than soley making profits.
To be fair to Lord Sugga he does sometimes save someone on their previous good performance and does point up when Nick/Karren have said that the candidate has been a particularly good performer away from the selling element of the task. |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 5,924
|
Quote:
The format was exhausted during Series 4. They repeat the same tropes and "journeys" year on year and they're resorting to obvious scripting of events (and even of entire personalities, eg. Stuart Baggs) for fear they won't have the levels of drama to match up with the previous series.
It doesn't feel like there's anywhere to go from here. Much like X Factor, BGT and Big Brother it has outstayed its welcome. (Judging from the audition VTs on the website we're in for another batch of objectionable pretend-egoists. Susan was the only one not immediately repellant, imo.)
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Norn Iron
Posts: 1,177
|
Quote:
I thought there was going to be a junior apprentice first
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 426
|
Maybe...........it feels weird its on again for a new series, so soon after the last one
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 7,780
|
Quote:
If its so tired, why are you still watching? You even looked up the audition VTS on the website.
![]() I'm merely stating the facts here, not insulting the viewers; anyone who watches The Apprentice and thinks they're getting something new and non-formulaic each series is ignoring reality. |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 23,347
|
It doesn't feel like five minutes since we were watching the final between Stella and Chris, but I'm so glad it's back. I can't get enough of the Apprentice.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Digital Spy Forum
Posts: 4,382
|
I think there are better characters in this series, time will tell
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 705
|
Quote:
I really liked Junior Apprentice - I thought the candidates took it much more seriously - they weren't in it to be famous (well maybe apart from the blonde one with the beret and the lipstick, although she had a good business head too IMO).
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 5,258
|
The first episode had me laughing 'til I cried - so not too soon - mind you - I could well feel differently once they start cutting out the entertaining dead wood
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 4,192
|
Glad it's back, although I'm surprised they just didn't switch to Autumn transmission from here on in.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 78
|
Quote:
I agree, i've said on another thread there should be more emphasis on how a teams run, not just based on who makes more profits ecc. Theres more to being an Apprentice than soley making profits.
I often feel that the Apprentice is a perfect job application process for a telesales employee or 'headhunter' etc but not for a business person that will make a difference to a company and bring real tangible benefits. I understand that selling things makes decent tv, but sprinting around town trying to force someone into buying unedible food gives absolutely no indication as to how they will get on in business. |
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 5,843
|
Quote:
I understand that selling things makes decent tv, but sprinting around town trying to force someone into buying unedible food gives absolutely no indication as to how they will get on in business.
Well you could argue 'selling' is even more important this series. The £250,000 business venture will rely on selling a product or service so the winner has to be good at selling or marketing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 78
|
Quote:
Well you could argue 'selling' is even more important this series. The £250,000 business venture will rely on selling a product or service so the winner has to be good at selling or marketing.
Not much of this is reflected in the apprentice where if you stumble through a presentation, annoy your potential customers, and sell them a product that doesn't work, it's fine as long as you make more money than the other team. Don't get me wrong - I like the show. I'm a fan. But its reflective of everything in life now where its all about selling things and making money at all costs. Most of the clients I deal with would be completely put off by the pushy and aggressive approaches of the candidates but thats why most of them are stockbrokers/estate agents/telesales people etc rather than real business minds. In that task, it wouldn't have mattered if the orange juice made people ill, or the tomato soup was disgusting, or no financial planning was done, or no teamwork was in evidence, as long as they made the most money. While I find it highly amusing, I would hope young people dont think this is how good business people behave. |
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Nottingham, UK
Posts: 11,878
|
Quote:
Glad it's back, although I'm surprised they just didn't switch to Autumn transmission from here on in.
Quote:
Well you could argue 'selling' is even more important this series. The £250,000 business venture will rely on selling a product or service so the winner has to be good at selling or marketing.
I think the show sees sales as a proxy for negotiation and persuasion in general. |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 12:21.

