DS Forums

 
 

Doctor Who....Soap?????


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 09-05-2011, 22:24
Muttley76
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: I wear a Stetson now...
Posts: 92,647
To be fair the OP wasn't the first person to bring RTD into this thread, that happened in post 3.....
The OP implied that this soapiness was something that was specific to Moffats era, which obviously is not the case. They then went on to state quite clearly in their response to my post, that they believed was something we saw more in the Moffat era than the RTD era, which is quite clearly not case.

Responses in this thread have not, as I said, been about lauding one over the other but pointing out that both have used aspects that could be seen as soapy in their one ways, and that to try and claim it as a recent phenomena is highly flawed.
Muttley76 is offline   Reply With Quote
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
Old 09-05-2011, 22:32
Benjamin Sisko
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Deep Space Nine
Posts: 1,855
Let me just throw this out there.

Jackie Tyler talked about Eastenders in front of the Doctor.

Ho hum.

Benjamin Sisko is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-05-2011, 22:55
Helbore
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 10,111
Is it just me or... <snip>
Yes, it's just you.

Helbore is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-05-2011, 23:40
KezM
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,360
I don't think there are Soap elements in Moffat's Who at all, but I didn't really think there were Soap elements in RTD's era either (but I agree there were more in RTD's era than in Moffat's).
I agree with this! I really think people who keep referring to soap elements have never watched a soap. What we have is human drama, not the same as a soap. If it was a soap Rose would have been in a full on love triangle with the Doctor and Captain Jack, probably ending up pregnant and then trying to arrange an abortion so she could stay on the TARDIS - and Martha would have been working with the Master to get revenge on the Doctor for not loving her, and the Doctor would have taken to drinking some Time Lord version of alcohol to deal with the pain of losing Rose and probably end up crashing the TARDIS, leaving Martha paralysed and the Doctor declaring his love for her out of guilt. And Amy really would be sleeping with both the Doctor and Rory and hiding the baby from the Doctor because she thinks it might be his. That would be what you call a soap! What we have characters relating to each other and having emotions towards each other! That is what you call drama! It is a way of making the audience relate and care what is happening to the characters. A few subtle references to the Doctor and Rose having a love for each other and a married couple possibly having a baby does not a soap make!
KezM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-05-2011, 23:54
CD93
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: The Wilderness
Posts: 13,088
Three episodes... three episodes with aliens... three episodes with clear science fiction... three episodes with aliens, clear science fiction and characters that care about each other...


Not much has changed in 47 years.
CD93 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-05-2011, 23:54
Joanne1938
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 454
Its great TV, its great Dr. Who .So whats the issue????
Joanne1938 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-05-2011, 23:55
Talma
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 5,173
Was nowhere near as bad in the RTD era as it is now!
Point taken on the silents though!
As I said, maybe it's just me!)
I still think you must be joking. Apart from the first two companions being in love or having a crush on the Doctor, in RTD's time they also had families, and not particularly likeable ones at that (Wilf excepted) who took up valuable airtime that could have focussed on the Doctor himself who was almost sidelined a few times in favour of people who could have made a brief appearance to show the companions had some kind of background, like in fact Amy's parents did at the very end of last series. All I really want to see is the Doctor and the companion/s of the day fighting aliens and having adventures in time and space.
Talma is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-05-2011, 00:55
Dr Ginge
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: The Swimming Pool
Posts: 2,126
You would get better CPR in eastenders though
Dr Ginge is offline Follow this poster on Twitter   Reply With Quote
Old 10-05-2011, 01:25
handymelon
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Cloud Cuckoo Land
Posts: 4,569
I found a lot of the relationship and family stuff in the RTD era very wearing and am glad it's been toned down, but this post:

I really think people who keep referring to soap elements have never watched a soap. What we have is human drama, not the same as a soap. If it was a soap Rose would have been in a full on love triangle with the Doctor and Captain Jack, probably ending up pregnant and then trying to arrange an abortion so she could stay on the TARDIS - and Martha would have been working with the Master to get revenge on the Doctor for not loving her, and the Doctor would have taken to drinking some Time Lord version of alcohol to deal with the pain of losing Rose and probably end up crashing the TARDIS, leaving Martha paralysed and the Doctor declaring his love for her out of guilt. And Amy really would be sleeping with both the Doctor and Rory and hiding the baby from the Doctor because she thinks it might be his. That would be what you call a soap! What we have characters relating to each other and having emotions towards each other! That is what you call drama! It is a way of making the audience relate and care what is happening to the characters. A few subtle references to the Doctor and Rose having a love for each other and a married couple possibly having a baby does not a soap make!
makes a very good point about how far removed from a soap Dr Who is/was even at its most Rose-ish. It also made me giggle for several seconds. Loving your work, Kez!
handymelon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-05-2011, 01:25
BobbyMalone
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Devon
Posts: 660
Peoples criticisms of the Moffat era are almost becoming absurd in their incoherent scattershot nature.
It's too American, it's too mystical and Harry Potter-esque, it's too complicated, it's too childish, it's incomprehensible but also too dumbed down, it's overly adult and not aimed at the kids but the daleks are like tellytubbies and aren't scary enough. And now it's too soapy.

Blimey can't people be at least a little consistent?!

No doubt after The Doctors Wife it'll be back to being too hard sci-fi and lacking mass appeal. But then it's also got an actress who has been in Coronation Street so maybe it's too soapy? But it's also a brand new original story which might be too difficult to follow and alienate the family audience but then it's also got an Ood in it so this can only be a sign of a lazy over reliance on past glories and/or budget cuts which indicate the show is due for cancellation. It seems some people are just determined to rain on the DW parade any way they can.

Me? RTD definitely used alot more 'soapy' elements to emphasise the human angle and make it easily relatable to every day situations and environments. Moffat has moved away from this to an extent and toned these things down but has been careful to include familiar reference points such as romance and pregnancy conundrums to ensure the show doesn't scare off the casual viewer who would usually shy away from 'genre' shows. Hes done this well. RTD did his thing well. What's the problem?
BobbyMalone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-05-2011, 03:36
mrkite77
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: arizona
Posts: 5,220
I have Dalek soap. Does this count.
Exfoliate!
mrkite77 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-05-2011, 07:07
lach doch mal
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Sofas are deities
Posts: 16,123
I agree with this! I really think people who keep referring to soap elements have never watched a soap. What we have is human drama, not the same as a soap. If it was a soap Rose would have been in a full on love triangle with the Doctor and Captain Jack, probably ending up pregnant and then trying to arrange an abortion so she could stay on the TARDIS - and Martha would have been working with the Master to get revenge on the Doctor for not loving her, and the Doctor would have taken to drinking some Time Lord version of alcohol to deal with the pain of losing Rose and probably end up crashing the TARDIS, leaving Martha paralysed and the Doctor declaring his love for her out of guilt. And Amy really would be sleeping with both the Doctor and Rory and hiding the baby from the Doctor because she thinks it might be his. That would be what you call a soap! What we have characters relating to each other and having emotions towards each other! That is what you call drama! It is a way of making the audience relate and care what is happening to the characters. A few subtle references to the Doctor and Rose having a love for each other and a married couple possibly having a baby does not a soap make!
Thanks you made my point much better.
lach doch mal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-05-2011, 07:08
lach doch mal
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Sofas are deities
Posts: 16,123
lach doch mal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-05-2011, 09:54
Granny McSmith
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 15,077
I agree with this! I really think people who keep referring to soap elements have never watched a soap. What we have is human drama, not the same as a soap. If it was a soap Rose would have been in a full on love triangle with the Doctor and Captain Jack, probably ending up pregnant and then trying to arrange an abortion so she could stay on the TARDIS - and Martha would have been working with the Master to get revenge on the Doctor for not loving her, and the Doctor would have taken to drinking some Time Lord version of alcohol to deal with the pain of losing Rose and probably end up crashing the TARDIS, leaving Martha paralysed and the Doctor declaring his love for her out of guilt. And Amy really would be sleeping with both the Doctor and Rory and hiding the baby from the Doctor because she thinks it might be his. That would be what you call a soap! What we have characters relating to each other and having emotions towards each other! That is what you call drama! It is a way of making the audience relate and care what is happening to the characters. A few subtle references to the Doctor and Rose having a love for each other and a married couple possibly having a baby does not a soap make!
Yes, exactly! This post made me laugh and nod in agreement.

It shows the difference between a soap, which DW is not, and a drama, which DW is.
Granny McSmith is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-05-2011, 09:56
Ibdolent
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 420
For a brief moment I thought this thread was about washing powder. Which reminds me - I saw some Doctor Who underwear the other day with Matt Smith's face on them.
Ibdolent is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-05-2011, 10:22
Scrabo1873
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 6
Yes, it's just you.

I think your right!
Scrabo1873 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-05-2011, 10:47
Ja88ed
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 1,391
Yes.



.
Ja88ed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-05-2011, 11:27
IvanIV
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 25,199
Nowhere near as bad!!!!!!!! Are you raving mad!!!!!!??????? RTD practically turned it into a soap! Mickey and Rose very soapish storyline. Constantly bring back old companions with ever lamer excuses for doing so!!!!!!!!!!!!!! In fact their was so much cheese in some of those episodes. Particularly in series 2 there was a lot of cheesy, girny smiles. Take 2 of my favourite episodes - the beast episodes when we first met the Ood, the crew were sometimes way too cheerful for a group of people stranded on a planet orbiting a black hole which if the power source keeping the planet in orbit! The whole Cybermen vs Daleks battle - or handbags at dawn as my Dad calls it. There was just so many elements you would associate with soaps.

Granted the Amy and Rory relationship is borderline soapish but there is a lot to it. The show always had its more soapy moments from what I can tell but RTD just took the whole crate and shuffed as much in as he could (pun intended I'm afraid). If you actually look at the what you might call soap moments RTD trumps Moffat. Moffat has steared away from that far more than RTD ever did. In fact I quite like the Amy/Rory dynamic - you get some depth to the stories (albeit I'm no big fan of Amy but there you go).

Rant over
At least RTD did this "soap" stuff properly and believably, those who like it, were happy. Now it feels like a token "soap" stuff, at least for me. So besides those who disliked it before, it is now disliked also by some of those for whose benefit it is supposed to be there.
IvanIV is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-05-2011, 11:46
johnnysaucepn
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 6,651
RTD had lots of content focussing on the characters, their relationships between each other, and their relationships between them and other members of the human race.

So does SM. Nothing's really changed. Sure, little of SM's run so far has taken place in a normal domestic setting (The Lodger), and even when it does it's sometimes (Eleventh Hour, Amy's Choice) still an unreal version of it, but I don't think that makes a huge difference. It still brings across the theme of the contrast between the everyday and the fantastic, just like it used to.
johnnysaucepn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-05-2011, 11:47
phil solo
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 9,378
Thread opener inadvertently reinforces cruel and damaging stereotype about "socially awkward" Doctor Who fans with rant about 'icky relationship stuff' and not enough aliens
phil solo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-05-2011, 11:52
Helbore
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 10,111
Which reminds me - I saw some Doctor Who underwear the other day with Matt Smith's face on them.
You saw Daisy Lowe's knickers?

Helbore is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-05-2011, 11:54
phil solo
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 9,378
For a brief moment I thought this thread was about washing powder. Which reminds me - I saw some Doctor Who underwear the other day with Matt Smith's face on them.
"I wear pants now. Pants are cool"
phil solo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-05-2011, 12:50
mossy2103
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 68,698
Yes it is.

or is anyone else getting fed up with doctor who at the minute?
No.

A married couple showing their love and the is she isn't she tale of pregnancy (not to mention the fast becoming tedious river song story line!) seems to be pushing the programme more into soap territory than sci fi!
It's known as giving depth to the characters,depth to the storyline, and quite possibly another angle to an ongoing story arc. It's not even stuff that is exclusive to soaps, it happens in many dramas, as it does in real life.

I'm loving it.
mossy2103 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-05-2011, 13:00
CoalHillJanitor
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 15,572
I think your right!
Welcome to the forum, btw.
CoalHillJanitor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-05-2011, 14:14
aka_lucifer
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: San Fernando, Gran Canaria
Posts: 1,020
You saw Daisy Lowe's knickers?

No, it was a River Thong!


*Gets coat, runs like buggery*
aka_lucifer is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply




 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 00:05.