|
||||||||
Drinking Game for Apprentice new Series |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,380
|
Drinking Game for Apprentice new Series
Just to make it fun, take a drink when:
1) One of the boys suggest "A-Team" as the team name 2) A candidate makes up new words (eg, carmically, retributed) 3) A fired candidate in the taxi says "You've not seen the last of me, I'm going on to bigger thingsI'm sure there are plenty more but am struggling to think of them at the moment... any more suggestions from people? |
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 695
|
That not one of them will have a suggestion for the team name even though they all have known for years its the first thing they will need to do. I have no idea why every single series they sit there thinking of a name as though they had no idea that task was coming.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 3,089
|
Quote:
That not one of them will have a suggestion for the team name even though they all have known for years its the first thing they will need to do. I have no idea why every single series they sit there thinking of a name as though they had no idea that task was coming.
It's a constant source of amazement that most of the candidates seem to manage to get caught out in various ways that imply they've never even seen an episode of the apprentice. If I were going for it I'd study the old programmes over and over and over again to make sure I was familiar with every nuance and make sure I exhibited the behaviour that gains Sugar's approval. (Well, I say I would - I'd try - but I doubt it's that easy.) I don't trust the producers and am convinced that the vast majority of the candidates are nowhere near as useless or stupid as they tend to come across. I reckon it's 5% inherent uselessness and 95% production company manipulation. (With obvious exceptions such as pantsman and Sophocles. )
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Kessingland, Suffolk
Posts: 85,524
|
Quote:
If I were going for it I'd study the old programmes over and over and over again to make sure I was familiar with every nuance and make sure I exhibited the behaviour that gains Sugar's approval.
(Well, I say I would - I'd try - but I doubt it's that easy.) One week he might "fire" someone for disagreeing with the Project Manager and the next week he might "fire" someone for NOT disagreeing with the PM |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Glasgow
Posts: 3,824
|
Candidates describing themselves as 'dynamic'.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Kessingland, Suffolk
Posts: 85,524
|
1 drink if
Nick rolls his eyes or purses his lips 2 drinks if he does both |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,635
|
Quote:
Probably staged.
It's a constant source of amazement that most of the candidates seem to manage to get caught out in various ways that imply they've never even seen an episode of the apprentice. If I were going for it I'd study the old programmes over and over and over again to make sure I was familiar with every nuance and make sure I exhibited the behaviour that gains Sugar's approval. (Well, I say I would - I'd try - but I doubt it's that easy.) I don't trust the producers and am convinced that the vast majority of the candidates are nowhere near as useless or stupid as they tend to come across. I reckon it's 5% inherent uselessness and 95% production company manipulation. (With obvious exceptions such as pantsman and Sophocles. )Mark Burnett on editing The Apprentice Mark Burnett talking about The Apprentice |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 3,406
|
Every time Lord Sugar says bloody
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Up the creak without a paddle
Posts: 5,542
|
"If you make me PM next i'll show what i can do" should be included.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 2,035
|
If only I'd seen this thread a little earlier.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Ireland
Posts: 4,312
|
Quote:
I don't trust the producers and am convinced that the vast majority of the candidates are nowhere near as useless or stupid as they tend to come across. I reckon it's 5% inherent uselessness and 95% production company manipulation. (With obvious exceptions such as pantsman and Sophocles.
)![]() ![]()
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 2,035
|
Can I take a drink because someone posted a smilie in a thread about The Apprentice? That would make life fun. I think I'll play that game, even if I'm playing by myself...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 882
|
I have a drink every time someone says "Lord Sugar"... it drives me to it!!!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 2,035
|
Are you trying to get me pissed bandersist2008? Now I'll have to have a drink to that as too. Ah well, in for a shot, in for a peg or two.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: York
Posts: 1,206
|
'That's my bag' irritates me.
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Ireland
Posts: 4,312
|
Quote:
Can I take a drink because someone posted a smilie in a thread about The Apprentice? That would make life fun. I think I'll play that game, even if I'm playing by myself...
![]() ![]() ![]() Here. Knock yourself out... |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Newcastle upon Tyne
Posts: 1,053
|
I recorded Wednesdays episode to watch on Friday, so I'll try some of those.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 12:25.


)

