• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • Doctor Who
A big difference across the series
Jepson
11-05-2011
Watching the Sarah Jane with Tom Baker last night, one thing that stood out at the end was the difference in the partings.

Back then SJ didn't hug the doctor - didn't even give him a peck. Despite the fact that they had just spent a great deal of time and a great many adventures together.

Contrast that with the goodbye between DT and SJ.

Things have certainly changed.
TEDR
11-05-2011
Without being old enough to know for sure, isn't that just reflective of society as a whole? Even as a boy, many (most, if I'm honest) of my close friends are female and a hug is a normal greeting. In fact, I've frequently house shared with females or with other mixed groups, whereas in the 70s that sort of thing seemed to be enough to trigger a sitcom.
DoctorQui
11-05-2011
I think that there was a no touchy-touchy rule back then, no romance albeit hidden between the Doctor (who then was a father figure) and the companion.

Romance has now come into it, sadly
Granny McSmith
11-05-2011
Originally Posted by DoctorQui:
“I think that there was a no touchy-touchy rule back then, no romance albeit hidden between the Doctor (who then was a father figure) and the companion.

Romance has now come into it, sadly”

Or happily, as some of us would say.
neel
11-05-2011
I think society has changed quite conciderably in the 40 odd years since the stories in question were written and broadcast.

It would be odd if Doctor Who was still being written to reflect the quite conservative social attitudes that were displayed in primetime BBC TV in the 1970's. I think its a reasonable assumption that had the show continued in that mould its 21st relaunch would have been a failure.

Crikey, even cornerstones of traditional broacasting like the Archers have had a modern 'sexy' makeover recently. For better or worse its just the way of modern broadcasting.
DoctorQui
11-05-2011
Originally Posted by neel:
“I think society has changed quite conciderably in the 40 odd years since the stories in question were written and broadcast.

It would be odd if Doctor Who was still being written to reflect the quite conservative social attitudes that were displayed in primetime BBC TV in the 1970's. I think its a reasonable assumption that had the show continued in that mould its 21st relaunch would have been a failure.

Crikey, even cornerstones of traditional broacasting like the Archers have had a modern 'sexy' makeover recently. For better or worse its just the way of modern broadcasting.”

Oh I agree, I just crave the simplicity of my childhood sometimes
neel
11-05-2011
I was born in the mid 80's, and even the McCoy stuff was pretty much beofre my time. I don't remember Dr Who being anything other than a hormone and Inuendo driven romp.

andy1231
11-05-2011
At the time I wasn't even aware that there was any sort of relationship between Sarah & The Doctor. It wasn't untill School Reunion that it became apparent to me that there had been a relationship (albeit hidden) between the two of them. Did I genuinly miss this at the time or is this just something that has been "invented" in new Who ?
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map