|
||||||||
Jim to Win |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 370
|
Jim to Win
Edna is horrible.
|
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Earth dumbarse
Posts: 4,394
|
There are other people apart from Edna who could win, its only week 2.
Jim is over-rated, cant wait till he is fired and see all you all crying that your messiah has gone
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Guest
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 679
|
Jim is an ideal candidate for the job and would give Alan Sugar.....sorry Lord Sugar a run for his money.
I think he's in with a very good shout. That doesn't mean I like him
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,643
|
Quote:
Jim is an ideal candidate for the job and would give Alan Sugar.....sorry Lord Sugar a run for his money. I think he's in with a very good shout. That doesn't mean I like him
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Surrey
Posts: 3,310
|
Quote:
That might be his undoing in the end though, if he appears just toooo clever and toooo slick. LAS isn't going to want anyone who might upstage him.
I already sense a slightly different emphasis in the boardroom from AMS. In the past he hasn't usually let them attack each other; saying things like "You won't go far in this process" etc. Historically he has tended to smack that down and say "Excuse me, that's for me to decide" etc. But this year he appears to be letting comments like that slide so I'm wondering if he's going to let them battle it out a bit more because he isn't looking for a subordinate as such this year. |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Jackie's World
Posts: 15,321
|
It is a bit early for me as we haven't seen most of them in any kind of business action. On the basis of what we have seen, Jim is the early front runner.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 11:08.


