There just bits of flesh too, if we can show male nipples why not female ones.

No different to the music channels showing Britney dressed (or undressed) like that in her music video and that got to number 1 and was shown everywhere. Do you just want tot complain? Have you not had anything to complain about this week? No doubt thats why the daily star picked up on it aswell. ALl that paper is good for is complaining and pages and pages of naked women if im not mistaken. Touch hypocritical considering they sell ALL day, BGT isnt on till 8pm and ITV covered her up. More than can be said for the lassies in the star.

So she has got through by the show's bosses? I thought she got a no I personally didn't think she was that racey, she looked alot like Britney though.

Tell me this, i watched this last night and she was given 3 no's by the judges.
Reading todays News of the world they say the judges changed thier minds and let her through anyway, is that true or false?

and if true, why itv not show it?

Like it or not, there is a difference between what's acceptable for a man to show and for a woman to show.

A man can walk down the street without a shirt on and no-one would probably think anything of it (unless it was the middle of December) but if a girl did it it would undoubtedly cause a commotion.

Likewise, if a man 'exposes' himself it's considered a crime. If a woman showed her bits men would love it. And I really can't imagine the Queen enjoying it, can you?

It's double standards, yes, but that's the world we live in.

Having a stripper on a family programme is generally considered a no-no.

The only thing offensive about it was the vocals...

I would've loved to have seen her face when she was watchig it back! She must've been cringing so bad, she was just an absolute embarrassment to herself!

And as I said in the episode discussion thread, if you deem it inappropriate, you don't have to watch, there's other channels and an off button to your TV. And I have seen a lot worse before watershed many a time!

And I have to agree with the most part to twenty10 - if it was a topless man, no one would have a problem with it.

Also, she wasn't even topless, ITV made it worse by adding the censorship as there actually wasn't anything there to see!

she was rubbish and adding to what Dombo said above, i too read that even though she got 3 no's the producers persuaded the judges to let her through? why was this not shown? plus i thought the judges had to whittled down the acts to 50 or something for the semi's so why am i reading that the people who got through have got to the semis when they need to be whittled down unless they dont do this now?

She's 30, blimey she looked a lot younger.


Great impersonator, and she actually sang live and danced at the same time which is more that Britney can do.

I could laugh at the papers when they say 'lesbian kiss'. It was only a very quick peck. She barely had time to make contact with Amanda's skin for it to be classed as a 'lesbian kiss'. They don't half go overboard with these headlines. I was actually expecting her to give Amanda a kiss that lasted about 2 seconds. Lesbian kiss? Pfft.

Apart from the fact that she was very good looking () you're right, she was very out of tune indeed! I was cringing when listening to her.

Because fella's chests aren't seen as purely sexual.

Maybe it's the photographer in me, but I thought that she had terrible legs

I know that the rest of you probably weren't looking at her legs

Yes, and in the case of the guy who balanced buckets on his head while rubbing his belly, it's gratuitous and shouldn't be allowed!

Tell that to Amanda.

Wonder if the porno meisters have been in touch?. Could make big money!!

I was about to post this! We also had that bizarre "artist" who was on Come Dine With Me.

She was on GMTV a couple of years ago wearing the same outfit the blue airhostess one..

Lainey