Originally Posted by brumilad:
“While of course there is a link between the running of the business of a football club and the performance of the team I don't see how a team getting relegated makes the managing director a bad business woman?
The fact is under her management she dragged Birmingham City from the brink of bankruptcy and at the moment is in charge of a club that has been left in a dire financial state thanks to the previous chairman. While being relegated will do no favours her job at the moment is to try and maintain some growth and stability to the financial state of the club wherever the club is in the league.
Her success as a businesswoman will be dictated how well she manages the mess the books are in. In making the club profitable again.”
I've raised this issue on another thread about KB
There is more than a "link" between being on the board and the performance of a club.
In my view if all KB was guilty of was trying to sort out the mess of previous owners I wouldn't criticise her. Unfortunately ever since Gold/Sullivan and Brady took over there has been one disaster after another.
1)The hiring of the manager
2)The way the manager was treated while the board tried to entice Martin O'neill to the job
3)Brady allegedly whipping up player discontent by sending the players texts asking them to turn against the manager
4) Wanting to change the name of the club
etc etc
With respect to your last point the success of a football club is not soley judged (rightly or wrongly) on the balance sheet