• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • TV Shows: UK
The Ratings Thread (Part 20)
<<
<
90 of 126
>>
>
jonnyblack
03-06-2011
Originally Posted by Charnham:
“I just updated my digiduide, when did Chelsea Girls, become Made in Chelsea?

http://www.digitalspy.co.uk/tv/s143/...ls-series.html”

As far as I'm aware the title was changed as they realised the inclusion of more than just female characters would improve the show. In terms of on-air branding, the show has only ever been referred to as "Made in Chelsea", including the pre-airing adverts and twitter updates from the E4 account.
Charnham
03-06-2011
that will teach me to write off a show whilst its still in development
D.M.N.
03-06-2011
BGT won't be tape-checked in the morning, the first show anyway.

Also, I notice during the break in Corrie they went through the phone numbers for the acts. Clearly someone noticed the viewership gap between the main show and results show.
Last edited by D.M.N. : 03-06-2011 at 21:15
Brekkie
03-06-2011
Originally Posted by Grenade:
“It was a drama series when it first started out and turned into a soap. If Hollyoaks Later gets healthy ratings, then theres no reason why, in theory, moving Hollyoaks to 2 weekly hour long slots couldn't work. The success of Hollyoaks Later could be due to the 'event' feel of it, but theres nothing to say it won't work weekly, There is only one way to find out.”

It was commissioned as a weekly drama yes, but so was Corrie. It quickly became a soap.


Quote:
“I wouldn't say it is being saved by Channel 4 because of the mess it is in. If it was in that bad a state, Channel 4 could easily dump an extra episode in and get a bigger audience at a much lower cost. But if you think Channel 4 is in a big mess, then I don't understand your earlier logic to axe Shameless. That is one of their better rated shows and one of their only returnable dramas.”

I'm a massive Shameless fan but it's a drama which has to end sometime, and with ratings falling significantly this year along with the quality of the show it needs to begin working towards wrapping up - and releasing a significant amount of C4's drama budget for them to plough into new drama.

Both the BBC and ITV of late have axed shows as decisions had to be made and they couldn't recommission everything perhaps they'd like too - and C4 should be no different, and indeed just like it's motives for axing Big Brother it should now be encouraging new talent too emerge rather than holding on to a show which rides on previous success.

Originally Posted by Charnham:
“would a move to E4 do the same for Hollyoaks? Actually I dont why I bothered I dont think it would, it already airs first look on E4, so im not sure what would change.”

As someone pointed out elsewhere on DS unlike Neighbours Hollyoaks hasn't really got international sales to supplement it's funding. If it moved to E4 although I'm sure it would be made for less I'd guess it would come out of the E4 budget, though probably maintain it's C4 presence within T4 - though I doubt neither E4 or T4 could justify a significant chunk of it's budget going to one show.

However, that said Hollyoaks does provide a crucial hook into the evening for E4 - and with Friends gone losing Hollyoaks as well would leave it's evening schedules empty.

Originally Posted by jonnyblack:
“I don't think Hollyoaks needs axing just yet. They are in the now unfortunately predictable "summer slump" ratings wise. It will pick up in September.”

People said that last year and the year before - and it just didn't, so now it's "summer slump" is a million or so less than it's summer slumps from a couple of years ago, and indeed checking the ratings we're close to seeing the C4 airings fall below what the E4 episodes were getting regularly just 2-3 years ago.

Quote:
“ But this is where they should be targetting. From recent cast updates it seems they are shooting 6 weeks ahead so if they take the opportunity and act now then we could have a solid show in time for more people tuning in and create a buzz again.”

The thing is that isn't happening - although they shoot six weeks ahead, it is taking about six months for changes made by producers to make it to screen. As I said earlier it was a problem when Bryan Kirkwood left, then when Lucy Allan was sacked and then when Paul Marquess left too - there is something seriously wrong with how the show is run for the show to completely fall apart everytime the Series Producer moves on.

Originally Posted by Glenn A:
“Hollyoaks is stuffed period. It is now attracting the sort of ratings Brookside attracted in its last days. However, since it is made by Phil Redmond, no doubt this paranoid egomaniac will blame the powers that be at Channel 4 and the media for destroying Hollyoaks in the same way he made the same rantings nine years ago about Brookside. In fact he became so deluded he even tried to sue someone for making derogatory comments about Lindsay Corkhill, a soap character FFS. No doubt if Channel 4 wield the axe, then will see entire episodes with two characters setting the worlds to rights and someone making a coded attack on Channel 4 in the last episode.”

Although I think Phil Redmond has now completely cut his ties with Hollyoaks and Lime Pictures. I doubt he'd do it but I think the absolutely last role of the dice would be to get him back to oversee it.
Andy23
03-06-2011
After a few weaker shows, they've pulled it out of the bag tonight with a strong results show, and more good acts than poor acts. If the results show drops off a lot from the results then it would be strange.
dan2008
03-06-2011
Originally Posted by Andy23:
“After a few weaker shows, they've pulled it out of the bag tonight with a strong results show, and more good acts than poor acts. If the results show drops off a lot from the results then it would be strange.”

Viewers would have stuck with it becuase 'JLS' was performing
Dancc
03-06-2011
Originally Posted by dan2008:
“Viewers would have stuck with it becuase 'JLS' was performing”

The audience figures for their one off special prior to The X Factor final last year suggests they are not that big a draw. I think Cowell wheels them out every series as a reminder that these shows do occasionally produce acts that go on to be successful.

Fab episode of The Mentalist tonight. Can't wait for next week.
Agent F
03-06-2011
Originally Posted by Andy23:
“After a few weaker shows, they've pulled it out of the bag tonight with a strong results show, and more good acts than poor acts. If the results show drops off a lot from the results then it would be strange.”

A really strong performance show as well, rounding off a bit of an iffy week for BGT talent-wise.
dan2008
03-06-2011
Originally Posted by Dancc:
“The audience figures for their one off special prior to The X Factor final last year suggests they are not that big a draw. I think Cowell wheels them out every series as a reminder that these shows do occasionally produce acts that go on to be successful.

Fab episode of The Mentalist tonight. Can't wait for next week.”

I caught BGT results tonight and its so like the x factor .
The way they introduced JLS with 4 number 1 singles blah.....
And simon saying i want to keep both acts it's very hard.....
(key Music) 5 mins later and the votes are

Anyway i thought JLS were quite big?
Jonwo
03-06-2011
Originally Posted by Brekkie:
“I

I'm a massive Shameless fan but it's a drama which has to end sometime, and with ratings falling significantly this year along with the quality of the show it needs to begin working towards wrapping up - and releasing a significant amount of C4's drama budget for them to plough into new drama.

Both the BBC and ITV of late have axed shows as decisions had to be made and they couldn't recommission everything perhaps they'd like too - and C4 should be no different, and indeed just like it's motives for axing Big Brother it should now be encouraging new talent too emerge rather than holding on to a show which rides on previous success.”

With Shameless, it's doing well but the quality has novedived since they started doing 16-22 episodes per series. I agree they should end it before it starts dragging down the schedule and use the money freed up to fund more series rather than one-offs.

I hope Sirens does well, it looks a return to the Teachers/No Angels type dramas they used to show, they may not have been critically acclaimed but they were popular.
Grenade
03-06-2011
Originally Posted by Jonwo:
“With Shameless, it's doing well but the quality has novedived since they started doing 16-22 episodes per series. I agree they should end it before it starts dragging down the schedule and use the money freed up to fund more series rather than one-offs.”

Or they could just scale it back to 8-10 episodes and free the budget up that way. There is no logic in Channel 4 axing it when it it a returnable drama that has good ratings, something they're severely lacking in. BBC and ITV are different when they axe hits, they axe them because they can, they have other programmes in those areas to support them.
Brekkie
03-06-2011
Originally Posted by dan2008:
“I caught BGT results tonight and its so like the x factor .
The way they introduced JLS with 4 number 1 singles blah.....”

They only started doing that last night for some reason - so tacky. Actually not the topic for here I know but I think the pretty awful 3D graphics for the intros this week have really let the show down and made it look cheap. They've usually much better than that.
dave01
04-06-2011
Originally Posted by dan2008:
“How is it?
EastEnders got 4.9m (or there abouts) on the Friday last year and tonight the Very Hot weather and BGT will dent it alot.

Corrie is on at 9:00pm (It's alot darker at that time) it's not rating against anything big and it's the final to the storyline.

The Big Eastenders storyline thats been running this week hasn't been promoted at all and only the fact that 'David Essex' enters tonight has.”

Eastenders recorded an overnight figure of 4.34m (20.7%) for the Friday episode against BGT on 4th June last year. The top temperature in London that day last year was 28 Celsius.

Today I expect Eastenders will pull a figure around the 4.5m - 5.0m mark. The reason I think it will be a little higher than last year is due to the David Essex trailers they have been playing all week; although I'm only predicting a year-on-year rise of between 160k to 660k, nothing to impressive.
dave01
04-06-2011
Originally Posted by rzt:
“
Quote:
“Originally Posted by dave01 View Post
RZT, do you have the demographics for The Apprentice/BGT? I suspect The Apprentice beat BGT in the key advertising demos. Indeed if these were US style ratings we could well be saying The Apprentice won the clash.”

Here's the Demo Info for that Apprentice/BGT clash: http://i54.tinypic.com/15e91lg.jpg

The Apprentice beat Britain's Got Talent in the 16-34 demo (1.7m vs 1.36m). BGT skewed older than how it usually skews, probably because The Apprentice had the 30-min advantage and took away some of those 16-34s who didn't tune back at 9.30pm (usually BGT's audience is made up of 23-25% 16-34s). The Apprentice's age skew was pretty much the same as previous weeks.”


Thanks RZT.

Looks like as I suspected The Apprentice beat BGT quite comfortably in the key demos when head-to-head despite being 1.2m total viewers behind. Although seeing as BGT is twice the runtime of The Apprentice I'm sure they'd rather stick with BGT.
Georged123
04-06-2011
New BBC/HBO drama starring Mr Sherlock.

http://www.digitalspy.co.uk/tv/news/...r-bbc-hbo.html

I guess that dispels rumours HBO will be only dealing with Sky from now on.
Fudd
04-06-2011
I wonder whether Coronation Street would've outrated Britain's Got Talent last year had it completed the week as planned. I'm not sure if ITV expected it to beat Britain's Got Talent, but it's certainly held up well. I hope Britain's Got Talent holds up; it was the strongest semi final tonight and with the Ronan Park saga and the return of Michael Moral it's got some (Syco produced) buzz about it.

EastEnders has been doing pretty well considering the opposition. BBC1 did really just lay down and give in last night with the two documentaries, though. I do wonder how a stripped drama would do against the ITV schedule but I guess thats too big a risk to take.
derek500
04-06-2011
Originally Posted by Georged123:
“New BBC/HBO drama starring Mr Sherlock.

http://www.digitalspy.co.uk/tv/news/...r-bbc-hbo.html

I guess that dispels rumours HBO will be only dealing with Sky from now on.”

They never said they were.

Quote:
“Sky is now also HBO’s preferred UK partner for future co-productions. Previously HBO has co-produced projects with the BBC such as Rome, Extras and The Special Relationship. HBO has already come on board the second season of Sky One’s action series Strike Back, with an increased budget and episode order to bring it in line with HBO’s high-end philosophy.

“If we had something that was a free ball that needed a UK co-producer, we have an obligation to go to Sky first,” Schreger* explains. “But we do historically have arrangements with other broadcasters and we leave that open as a possibility.””

*Charles Schreger, HBO’s president of programming sales.

http://www.mattmueller.co.uk/index.p...article_id=451
rzt
04-06-2011
A few ratings from yesterday:

A peak of 11.4m watched last night's #BGT - a 50% share - and an average of 9.4m (45%).

An average of 9.9m, 42% for results show - up from 8.8m for the same show last year.

A peak audience of 10.2m (43%) watched the climax to a week of #Corrie. Friday's ep watched by an average of 9.7m (42%). #tvratings

Source: Tom Latchem, NOTW Editor
---------------------------------------------------------
Last year's Friday BGT averaged 9.3m (inc HD) so last night's figure was slightly up. Results show did well, up 1.1m y-o-y and highest rated this week apart from Monday's.
Score
04-06-2011
So BGT results outrated both BGT performances and Corrie. Probably because of BBC1 having a 9:30pm junction but impressive all the same.

So the semi finals have averaged 9.9m for the performances and 9.4m for the results - exactly the same as last year, but they've been generally more consistent this year (apart from rainy Monday) which is a positive worth noting.
Samthefootball
04-06-2011
Reading the Daily Mail it says that this Weekends final it expected to get 15 million. I Would have thought that would be a peek though.
Grenade
04-06-2011
Last nights performance show was very strong, and they had big names in the results show. That should give them the hint for next year.

How does the series average so far compare to previous years?
rzt
04-06-2011
Originally Posted by Grenade:
“How does the series average so far compare to previous years?”

Assuming the above overnights include +1, so far this series has averaged 9.7m (inc +1). The series average at this same point last year was 9.9m, so the average is down -2% y-o-y. That gap will most likely narrow to -1%, maybe even flat, after tonight's final.

Excluding +1, this year's average currently is ~9.3m, which would make it down -5% y-o-y.

Originally Posted by Samthefootball:
“Reading the Daily Mail it says that this Weekends final it expected to get 15 million. I Would have thought that would be a peek though.”

Yeah, that would be the 5-minute peak they're referring to. Last year's final peaked at 15m - given that this year's series is rating quite similarly to last year's, the peak ought to be quite close to that 15m mark.
ZoeMcCallister
04-06-2011
Excellent for BGT-I actually was expecting some very low figures this morning. Strong again for Corrie too. Including +1 I get the following figures:

Sunday 7.3m
Monday 10.7m
Tuesday 10.5m
Wednesday 9.5m
Thursday 10.4m
Friday 9.7m (excluding +1)

These ratings are fantastic and I reckon it would have got 1m less not in a BGT sandwich.
grahamzxy
04-06-2011
Originally Posted by Samthefootball:
“Reading the Daily Mail it says that this Weekends final it expected to get 15 million. I Would have thought that would be a peek though.”

You may think that 15m viewers will just take a peek - but I think the 5-minute peak could be 14.5million with an average of 12.4m.
Grenade
04-06-2011
Originally Posted by rzt:
“Assuming the above overnights include +1, so far this series has averaged 9.7m (inc +1). The series average at this same point last year was 9.9m, so the average is down -2% y-o-y. That gap will most likely narrow to -1%, maybe even flat, after tonight's final.

Excluding +1, this year's average currently is ~9.3m, which would make it down -5% y-o-y.”

It seems to have held up well with the absense of Simon in the earlier episodes, considering some of the results figures this week will have pulled the average down a bit. The big question now is, can X Factor do the same?
<<
<
90 of 126
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map